wakey

whenever they broke, Sheehan was usually first midfielder back there (as usual). A few times EE wasn't even in camera shot. Interesting how we all see things so differently.

Haven't seen the relative heat maps, but I'd wager EE was typically further forward than Sheehan. May well have set myself up to be proven wrong, but that's how I saw it.

Decent performance and result, sets Thursday up nicely. Bonham's not filling me with confidence last few games, but thought back four to a man were excellent.

Still think that was bollocks.

Like you can discuss England's greatest player and not even mention Geoff Thomas.

I'm convinced it's a myth that Erhahon offers some sort of defensive cover. For every time I've seen him put in a successful tackle I reckon there's a matching scenario where they've gone through him like he's a fucking hologram. Struggling to see what he brings. Also convinced that suggesting Erhahon replaces Sheehan in any scenario is the first sign of madness.

oh dear

bit like mine today. Had 3 guesses after I'd already got everything bar the first letter in the right place. Could still think of another 4 or 5 options. Total guessing game today for me.

Surely if you're a Reform voter in favour of big fuck off detention centres, you should be happy to have them in your constituency. Seems arse about tit to me,

Could / should have been out of sight well before their 3rd. Thought it was a good game, and a nice change not to feel too pissed off after a defeat.

I heard a rumour he was being wheeled around Manchester in a bucket by Max Conway and some French bloke.

When did our comedy step-over mon turn into prime Jay Jay? Outstanding today.

playing Bradford Northern here. How the fuck is their right back not on a yellow?

you've missed the T and included a surplus D and spelt 'furt' wrong.

volcano on a low light would do it

Should have been a comfortable win, ended up buzzing after a dramatic draw. Thought we were the better team 11 v 11 and then - other than a 5 minute spell after their third - the better side when 10 v 11. And to be fair, held our own on the umpteen times it was 9 v 11. For all the flaws, there's something a bit special about this team.

we've scored some proper belters this year

Agree with the waiting for it to click comment, but felt that way under Evatt for most of his tenure, and the last 18 months - 2 years were worse than this season for me. I mostly enjoyed the games this season until our slump around christmas. Since then it's been pretty hit and miss. If we're honest, for the most part it hasn't felt like a promotion season, more a transition. But we still have a decent shot at it so for now I'm on board with Gonzo's "it'll be reet".

I'd love to see BN strung up by his bollocks, but sadly we know he won't be. As for your Aussie mon, however brave and brilliant he was to win the VC, you can't go round executing civilians (if it turns out he has, still a trial to be held).

yep, not being allowed to murder unarmed civilians is just sooooo fucking woke

the half of the half they played as a 3 or the other half of the half when they were in a back 4? I like the fact you think it's our choice and nowt to do with the game situation.

Cardiff would need to lose 4 of their last 7 for us to catch them (if we won all 6 of ours). tint appnin

we went to a back 3 then back to a back 4. It's a good day for everyone to claim their preferred system worked.

Spent the best part of 2 years hoping he'll come good. Shocking waste of money, be glad to see the back of him. (for the record, if he scores the winner in the play off final I always said he was a good un)

press conference cancelled because some bloke was screaming and shouting then rugby tackled our camera equipment before getting arrested. Anyone else reckon that sounds like it could be McAtee