No tags, links or clips by myself

Just a recommendation which I've mentioned before 

Watch Bitter Lake by Adam Curtis 

It's the closest explanation I've seen to our relatively modern fucked up world

29 minutes ago, Dimron said:

I think the commanders in the field would recognise an outright war crime and lots of kit would go "tech" on the day

Iranian sympathiser.

1 minute ago, Sweep said:

Iranian sympathiser.

Fekoff

14 hours ago, Ani said:

It is an odd world when people support Trump over the basic principles of International law. 

It is an odd world when people support Trump despite not being to explain the objectives of the war, the plan and the endgame

It is an odd world when people who support Trump go into very untypical silence when allegations of market manipulation are made against the inner circle of the White House. 

It is an odd world when people seem to think Team America the movie is the way to run the world 

It's an odd world when people can't see the removal of the worlds biggest sponsor of terrorism is a good thing.

11 hours ago, Sweep said:

A bit of a bonkers statement that mate.

I'm not sure anybody is supporting Iran are they? - As ever, you feel that a side needs to be picked, honestly you can just disagree with what both sides are doing. 

Like most, we'd all like to see the Iranian regime toppled, and hopefully it'll happen - it would have been nice if those doing the toppling had a plan/strategy on how to do it though, at present, it looks like they're making it up as they go along, especially when you listen to any of the press conferences.

 

Less of the 'mate'.

8 hours ago, Sweep said:

If you're calling Trump a nonce, then you're supporting the Iranian regime

I knew that one would get them in. All the predictable ones too.

4 hours ago, Dimron said:

You'd think the haters in the field would recognise that an idle threat of an outright war crime is just more bluff and bluster by the great disruptor. He shouts shit and they leap on to the shovel.

 

8 hours ago, bolty58 said:

I knew that one would get them in. All the predictable ones too.

Ah

Fishing

Sure thing, owd chap.

9 hours ago, bolty58 said:

It's an odd world when people can't see the removal of the worlds biggest sponsor of terrorism is a good thing.

Has that happened ? Obviously that will be good. Is that the plan now ? How is it going ? 
 

To be clear everyone would like a change in leadership in Iran so stop pretending people support Iran. Imagine anyone other than Trump was running this, is it going well ? What actually is the plan ? Regime change ? Stop an imminent threat ? Destroy their nuclear programme again ? Even you must see it is at best disjointed. 
 

21 minutes ago, Ani said:

Has that happened ? Obviously that will be good. Is that the plan now ? How is it going ? 
 

To be clear everyone would like a change in leadership in Iran so stop pretending people support Iran. Imagine anyone other than Trump was running this, is it going well ? What actually is the plan ? Regime change ? Stop an imminent threat ? Destroy their nuclear programme again ? Even you must see it is at best disjointed. 
 

Blair did the same thing in Iraq and Bolty said Saddam had been doing a great job and should have been left alone.

I'm absolutely certain that Donald Trump could sit down and eat Bolty's family right in front of him and Bolty would help him put the ketchup on.

10 hours ago, bolty58 said:

It's an odd world when people can't see the removal of the worlds biggest sponsor of terrorism is a good thing.

They're removing Trump? 😉 

20 minutes ago, Spider said:

Blair did the same thing in Iraq and Bolty said Saddam had been doing a great job and should have been left alone.

 

I do love all that.

The GB news crew crowing we haven't steamed in fist and boot with the yanks are the first to slate Blair for Iraq.

Nobody doesn't want a regime change in Iran.

But that isn't Donald's goal is it.

And how many 'Iranian sponsored' attacks have there been in US again?

Maybe Don should've got the rest of Nato on board first instead of slagging every fucker off and threatening to withdraw and invade Greenland before he realised they couldn't defeat Iran and keep the Straights open themselves.

Edited March 31Mar 31 by gonzo

10 minutes ago, gonzo said:

I do love all that.

The GB news crew crowing we haven't steamed in fist and boot with the yanks are the first to slate Blair for Iraq.

Nobody doesn't want a regime change in Iran.

But that isn't Donald's goal is it.

And how many 'Iranian sponsored' attacks have there been in US again?

Maybe Don should've got the rest of Nato on board first instead of slagging every fucker off and threatening to withdraw and invade Greenland before he realised they couldn't defeat Iran and keep the Straights open themselves.

We’re dealing with a man who still uses felt tips to do any written work.

It’s barely a step up from crayons.

This is all about pressure from Israel (who have donny wonny wowwipop in their pocket because of Epstein) and oil.

The regime was shite, but so is the North Korean one and he popped out for lunch with him not so long back.

Unfortunately his supporters are every bit as thick and stubborn as he is and until he fucks off the world is a more dangerous place.

Not sure them Urgyhur dudes are loving life that much in China either tbh.

18 minutes ago, Spider said:

 

The regime was shite, but so is the North Korean one and he popped out for lunch with him not so long back.

 

see also Russia

looks like the secretary of war is on the same page as the current israeli regime

 

 

 

 

 

View this post on Instagram

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A post shared by Cory Booker (@corybooker)

3 hours ago, Ani said:

Has that happened ? Obviously that will be good. Is that the plan now ? How is it going ? 
 

To be clear everyone would like a change in leadership in Iran so stop pretending people support Iran. Imagine anyone other than Trump was running this, is it going well ? What actually is the plan ? Regime change ? Stop an imminent threat ? Destroy their nuclear programme again ? Even you must see it is at best disjointed. 
 

He'll never admit it.

If it was Starmer or the EU who had initiated this, he'd be all over them, and quite rightly so

Edited March 31Mar 31 by Sweep

5 minutes ago, Sweep said:

He'll never admit it.

If it was Starmer or the EU who had initiated this, he'd be all over them

Given it's not going as planned I'm surprised he's not blamed it on the Clooneys

Or Perloisi 

The treacherous slag 

Whaddaguy. Whaddatosser. Goes in, screws the world economy, keeps slagging all his allies off, keeps changing his mind what he’s doing, and then tells everyone to look after themselves and sort his mess out.

Couldn’t make it up…..well he is doing.

We can only hope that he gets assassinated very, very soon. It's amazing how he's now managed to further destabilise a region that was already on the brink, and then just decided to fuck off and leave everybody else to clean up the mess.

He surely cannot  be allowed to carry on like this for much longer? He called Democrats 'terrorists' the other day, he said he wants to manage the SO Hormuz ' and rename it Trump Strait' and said yet again that he is going to 'take' Cuba. Then there is the utter corruption going on that his administration doesn't even attempt to hide anymore. Just what is the threshold for impeachment ffs? The bloke is 100% loon

I bet Putin has had some superb nights sleep recently.

39 minutes ago, Bertie said:

Whaddaguy. Whaddatosser. Goes in, screws the world economy, keeps slagging all his allies off, keeps changing his mind what he’s doing, and then tells everyone to look after themselves and sort his mess out.

Couldn’t make it up…..well he is doing.

Remember everytime he comes with one of these the Tories, Reform and Bolty thought we should have been helping out from day one. Team America : World Police just been on Sky so he might been watching that. 
 

 

1 hour ago, Sweep said:

We can only hope that he gets assassinated very, very soon. It's amazing how he's now managed to further destabilise a region that was already on the brink, and then just decided to fuck off and leave everybody else to clean up the mess.

Netanyahu, Trump or both?

Surprising the old UN and ICC haven't ben dishing out the resolutions and subpoenas

13 hours ago, Ani said:

Has that happened ? Obviously that will be good. Is that the plan now ? How is it going ? 
 

To be clear everyone would like a change in leadership in Iran so stop pretending people support Iran. Imagine anyone other than Trump was running this, is it going well ? What actually is the plan ? Regime change ? Stop an imminent threat ? Destroy their nuclear programme again ? Even you must see it is at best disjointed. 
 

It all looks very obvious to me. I should really let you work it out.

Ground incursion likely. Eliminate IRGC pockets and locate and remove their enriched uranium hexafluoride.

Job done.

12 hours ago, gonzo said:

I do love all that.

The GB news crew crowing we haven't steamed in fist and boot with the yanks are the first to slate Blair for Iraq.

Nobody doesn't want a regime change in Iran.

But that isn't Donald's goal is it.

And how many 'Iranian sponsored' attacks have there been in US again?

Maybe Don should've got the rest of Nato on board first instead of slagging every fucker off and threatening to withdraw and invade Greenland before he realised they couldn't defeat Iran and keep the Straights open themselves.

Spider is off his trolley again I see.  Blair should be spelled Bliar by the way.