Liverpool are awful

Haha chin up dog heads

5 minutes ago, Didledee said:

Dunno why VAR asked the ref to lokk at the screen for that late Stones winner, Bernardo wasn't infront of the keeper who had a clear view.

Agreed. Never offside in a million years.

 

Got to get Messi involved somehow

Come on Chelsea. 

55 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Come on Chelsea. 

Standard Liverpool Pen 

1 hour ago, Marc505 said:

 

Got to get Messi involved somehow

Pipe down. Seeing Auckland City play against the elite is something dreams are made of😂

5 minutes ago, little whitt said:

Standard Liverpool Pen 

Chelsea could feel a touch aggrieved to be a goal down. 

Familiarly, they didn't take the chances.

4 minutes ago, tomski said:

Pipe down. Seeing Auckland City play against the elite is something dreams are made of😂

I looked into them when I saw it as I thought they'd only been formed in the last 12 months. 

They're not, the new team have been put into the Australian league, this Auckland are in the NZ league and will get pure panned!

6 minutes ago, tomski said:

Pipe down. Seeing Auckland City play against the elite is something dreams are made of😂

Wait until it's a 12-team tournament featuring Man City, Girona, Lommel, Troyes, Palermo, New York City, Montevideo City, Club Bolivar, Melbourne City, Yokohama Marinos, Shenzhen Peng City & Mumbai City

1 minute ago, Traf said:

Wait until it's a 12-team tournament featuring Man City, Girona, Lommel, Troyes, Palermo, New York City, Montevideo City, Club Bolivar, Melbourne City, Yokohama Marinos, Shenzhen Peng City & Mumbai City

💦💦💦

3 minutes ago, Marc505 said:

I looked into them when I saw it as I thought they'd only been formed in the last 12 months. 

They're not, the new team have been put into the Australian league, this Auckland are in the NZ league and will get pure panned!

The purest Auckland. None of the JCL Aussie nonsense and people sometimes call fifa.

11 minutes ago, tomski said:

The purest Auckland. None of the JCL Aussie nonsense and people sometimes call fifa.

Bang on, we're all Auckland City aren't we.

 

 

(Though FIFA have just allowed Miami in for winning their conference not the MLS outright so they can ensure Messi is around...)

Something they said in commentary earlier on surprised me, they've played eachother 10 times in the Champions League, didn't realise it was that many

9 minutes ago, Marc505 said:

Bang on, we're all Auckland City aren't we.

 

 

(Though FIFA have just allowed Miami in for winning their conference not the MLS outright so they can ensure Messi is around...)

Purists, yet forward thinkers. Can’t wait to get out there

15 minutes ago, tomski said:

Purists, yet forward thinkers. Can’t wait to get out there

Wonder how many will actually travel for this. South American clubs will probably take it much more seriously and take thousands but not sure about Europe. One for the vloggers I expect.

7 minutes ago, Marc505 said:

Wonder how many will actually travel for this. South American clubs will probably take it much more seriously and take thousands but not sure about Europe. One for the vloggers I expect.

Yeah. I’m sure they’ve tried this before. It’s shite and I think it will disappear soon once again

2 hours ago, Didledee said:

Dunno why VAR asked the ref to lokk at the screen for that late Stones winner, Bernardo wasn't infront of the keeper who had a clear view.

VAR asked the ref, because it had actually been disallowed by a late flag.

So they told the ref to have another look.

This according to 5live.

Yes that was it. Fuck knows why it took him so long to give it. Clear goal. Pundits on sky saying that Silva interfered with keeper . Bullshit. 

Those Roma training tops are a bit spesh

2 hours ago, Alf Hartigan said:

Yes that was it. Fuck knows why it took him so long to give it. Clear goal. Pundits on sky saying that Silva interfered with keeper . Bullshit. 

He pushed back into the keeper and if that was the other way Wolves are not getting the goal

9 minutes ago, RUREADY2ROLL said:

He pushed back into the keeper and if that was the other way Wolves are not getting the goal

I think they would. Ref saw the replay and knew he’d made the right decision. No way that was interfering. Take your point though that he might have favoured the big club. 

10 hours ago, RUREADY2ROLL said:

He pushed back into the keeper and if that was the other way Wolves are not getting the goal

He pushed back into the keeper as the corner is coming in, once Stones heads the ball thats the new phase of play where offside comes in to the equation and at that point he was nowhere near him and had already ducked. 

55 minutes ago, meanderson93 said:

He pushed back into the keeper as the corner is coming in, once Stones heads the ball thats the new phase of play where offside comes in to the equation and at that point he was nowhere near him and had already ducked. 

Completely agree. Never a foul or offside. I think the ref did well as Attwell left him in a tricky position. 

The issue is though in another game that foul/offside probably gets given. The consistency is almost impossible to get right as their are so many different factors and phase bollocks they all talk about.
 

https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/31185600/rihannas-asap-rocky-english-football-club-tranmere-rovers/
 

Can’t see how this can go wrong😂

2 hours ago, tomski said:

Completely agree. Never a foul or offside.

Well it WAS a foul. He backed into the keeper as the kick was taken.

Foul.

The offside is more debatable but it should be irrelevant as the would should be given.