Tonge moor green jacket Posted March 4 Posted March 4 Huddersfield and Wrexham drawing at HT. Stockport losing at Northampton. Wycombe 1 up. Quote
Matt Lofthouse Posted March 4 Posted March 4 1 hour ago, L/H White said: Looking like great business moving him on. Quote
bolty58 Posted March 4 Posted March 4 13 hours ago, jeep said: They're both good as well, as is Bread of Heaven.... I'm not as blinkered as some...... Quote
deeane Koontz Posted March 4 Posted March 4 13 hours ago, gonzo said: They've literally spent the past 50 years causing havoc everywhere they go and now they don't like anyone saying they are wronguns They've just done a minutes applause for their poor keeper 🤣 Players will be out in tshirts of support next Quote
jeep Posted March 4 Posted March 4 50 minutes ago, bolty58 said: Good choon there old chap...... 👍 Quote
bolty58 Posted March 5 Posted March 5 8 hours ago, jeep said: Good choon there old chap...... 👍 You are not wrong (this time 😉 ) Quote
Zico Posted March 5 Posted March 5 3 hours ago, L/H White said: Wasn't expecting that arsenal result for years they kept falling short due to lack of a proper midfield despite last night, it's the lack of a striker that will cost them but if they can get Saka & Martinelli back they might just give one of the Madrids a game in the next round tough game for Liverpool tonight as well Quote
L/H White Posted March 5 Posted March 5 this millwall keeper red card is getting a bit ridiculous aint it? fa stepping in to try and extend his ban seems a bit much to me of course, it's bad en and deserves the 3 match ban, but it wasn't intentional, just badly mistimed it's not like he's set out to do it like keane v haaland games gone Quote
Ani Posted March 5 Posted March 5 https://www.facebook.com/share/r/193Qgmh9g4/?mibextid=wwXIfr So here is Wrexhams winner the guy is actually stood in the goal, but not off side !! Quote
Tonge moor green jacket Posted March 5 Posted March 5 50 minutes ago, Ani said: https://www.facebook.com/share/r/193Qgmh9g4/?mibextid=wwXIfr So here is Wrexhams winner the guy is actually stood in the goal, but not off side !! Aye. Huddersfield player also stood on it. Would be brave call from any lino to flag that. Quote
Ani Posted March 5 Posted March 5 5 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: Aye. Huddersfield player also stood on it. Would be brave call from any lino to flag that. Eh ? He is stood in the goal behind the keeper. Quote
Tonge moor green jacket Posted March 5 Posted March 5 Doesn't matter, the Huddersfield lad has his foot on the line, so is playing him onside. If a player deliberately stands off the pitch and tries to sneak back on, then the ref can and should blow up, as he technically needs permission to re-enter the field. In this case the striker has been involved in a bit of a goal mouth scramble, momentum taken him over the line, then immediately got himself back into the field of play. Perfectly reasonable, from all concerned. We'd be mightily pissed off if some official tried to disallow a goal for us in those circumstances. Quote
bwfc2003 Posted March 5 Posted March 5 18 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: Doesn't matter, the Huddersfield lad has his foot on the line, so is playing him onside. If a player deliberately stands off the pitch and tries to sneak back on, then the ref can and should blow up, as he technically needs permission to re-enter the field. In this case the striker has been involved in a bit of a goal mouth scramble, momentum taken him over the line, then immediately got himself back into the field of play. Perfectly reasonable, from all concerned. We'd be mightily pissed off if some official tried to disallow a goal for us in those circumstances. But you need two players to play someone on-side - Quote
Ani Posted March 5 Posted March 5 18 minutes ago, bwfc2003 said: But you need two players to play someone on-side - Bloody rules eh ? Quote
Tonge moor green jacket Posted March 5 Posted March 5 (edited) 2 hours ago, bwfc2003 said: But you need two players to play someone on-side - There are two players- but there still has to be an infringement of the offside rule. He's back on when he scores, not hooking it in from the back of the net. If he was in the net, then he wouldn't be on the field of play, so it would rightly be disallowed. The linesman will have been able to see the incident, and would have flagged for it, if there was an infringement. Edited March 5 by Tonge moor green jacket Quote
Tonge moor green jacket Posted March 5 Posted March 5 Having yet another look, it's bobbling around that much, that you can't even tell who actually kicks it before the scorer. If anything, it slips from the keeper. Totally impossible for the lino to clearly see who kicked it in that melee. Quote
Stig Posted March 5 Posted March 5 (edited) 4 hours ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: Doesn't matter, the Huddersfield lad has his foot on the line, so is playing him onside. If a player deliberately stands off the pitch and tries to sneak back on, then the ref can and should blow up, as he technically needs permission to re-enter the field. In this case the striker has been involved in a bit of a goal mouth scramble, momentum taken him over the line, then immediately got himself back into the field of play. Perfectly reasonable, from all concerned. We'd be mightily pissed off if some official tried to disallow a goal for us in those circumstances. You need two players further back than the attacker for him to be onside. The rule doesn't come up much because usually a goalie is one of them, but he's clearly ahead of the goalie with only 1 hudds player in line. Looks a straightforward offside from that point of view. In terms of who it hit I have no idea from that angle so if that's the linesman's excuse fair enough. Edited March 5 by Stig Quote
Ani Posted March 5 Posted March 5 1 hour ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: There are two players- but there still has to be an infringement of the offside rule. He's back on when he scores, not hooking it in from the back of the net. If he was in the net, then he wouldn't be on the field of play, so it would rightly be disallowed. The linesman will have been able to see the incident, and would have flagged for it, if there was an infringement. You are making out up as you go along. First of all he was level - nonsense. As he is behind the keeper. he is either off side or is off the pitch . So given he scores he is either off side or re entered play. Unless it was a back pass 😂 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.