Liverpool are awful

 

 

1 hour ago, L/H White said:

 

Looking like great business moving him on. 

Arsenal definitely need a striker 😁

13 hours ago, jeep said:

They're both good as well, as is Bread of Heaven....

I'm not as blinkered as some......

 

13 hours ago, gonzo said:

They've literally spent the past 50 years causing havoc everywhere they go and now they don't like anyone saying they are wronguns

They've just done a minutes applause for their poor keeper 🤣

Players will be out in tshirts of support next

50 minutes ago, bolty58 said:

 

Good choon there old chap...... 👍

8 hours ago, jeep said:

Good choon there old chap...... 👍

You are not wrong (this time 😉 )

Wasn't expecting that arsenal result 

3 hours ago, L/H White said:

Wasn't expecting that arsenal result 

for years they kept falling short due to lack of a proper midfield

despite last night, it's the lack of a striker that will cost them

but if they can get Saka & Martinelli back they might just give one of the Madrids a game in the next round

tough game for Liverpool tonight as well

this millwall keeper red card is getting a bit ridiculous aint it?

fa stepping in to try and extend his ban seems a bit much to me

of course, it's bad en and deserves the 3 match ban, but it wasn't intentional, just badly mistimed 

it's not like he's set out to do it like keane v haaland 

games gone

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/193Qgmh9g4/?mibextid=wwXIfr
 

So here is Wrexhams winner the guy is actually stood in the goal, but not off side !! 

50 minutes ago, Ani said:

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/193Qgmh9g4/?mibextid=wwXIfr
 

So here is Wrexhams winner the guy is actually stood in the goal, but not off side !! 

Aye. Huddersfield player also stood on it.

Would be brave call from any lino to flag that.

5 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Aye. Huddersfield player also stood on it.

Would be brave call from any lino to flag that.

Eh ? He is stood in the goal behind the keeper. 

Doesn't matter, the Huddersfield lad has his foot on the line, so is playing him onside.

If a player deliberately stands off the pitch and tries to sneak back on, then the ref can and should blow up, as he technically needs permission to re-enter the field.

In this case the striker has been involved in a bit of a goal mouth scramble, momentum taken him over the line, then immediately got himself back into the field of play.

Perfectly reasonable, from all concerned.

We'd be mightily pissed off if some official tried to disallow a goal for us in those circumstances. 

18 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Doesn't matter, the Huddersfield lad has his foot on the line, so is playing him onside.

If a player deliberately stands off the pitch and tries to sneak back on, then the ref can and should blow up, as he technically needs permission to re-enter the field.

In this case the striker has been involved in a bit of a goal mouth scramble, momentum taken him over the line, then immediately got himself back into the field of play.

Perfectly reasonable, from all concerned.

We'd be mightily pissed off if some official tried to disallow a goal for us in those circumstances. 

But you need two players to play someone on-side - 

18 minutes ago, bwfc2003 said:

But you need two players to play someone on-side - 

Bloody rules eh ? 

He's offside.

2 hours ago, bwfc2003 said:

But you need two players to play someone on-side - 

There are two players- but there still has to be an infringement of the offside rule.

He's back on when he scores, not hooking it in from the back of the net.

If he was in the net, then he wouldn't be on the field of play, so it would rightly be disallowed.

The linesman will have been able to see the incident, and would have flagged for it, if there was an infringement.

Edited March 5, 20251 yr by Tonge moor green jacket

Having yet another look, it's bobbling around that much, that you can't even tell who actually kicks it before the scorer.

If anything, it slips from the keeper. 

Totally impossible for the lino to clearly see who kicked it in that melee.

4 hours ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Doesn't matter, the Huddersfield lad has his foot on the line, so is playing him onside.

If a player deliberately stands off the pitch and tries to sneak back on, then the ref can and should blow up, as he technically needs permission to re-enter the field.

In this case the striker has been involved in a bit of a goal mouth scramble, momentum taken him over the line, then immediately got himself back into the field of play.

Perfectly reasonable, from all concerned.

We'd be mightily pissed off if some official tried to disallow a goal for us in those circumstances. 

You need two players further back than the attacker for him to be onside. The rule doesn't come up much because usually a goalie is one of them, but he's clearly ahead of the goalie with only 1 hudds player in line. Looks a straightforward offside from that point of view. 

In terms of who it hit I have no idea from that angle so if that's the linesman's excuse fair enough.

Edited March 5, 20251 yr by Stig

PSG are playing some superb stuff

Kvara is a different level. 

 

1 hour ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

There are two players- but there still has to be an infringement of the offside rule.

He's back on when he scores, not hooking it in from the back of the net.

If he was in the net, then he wouldn't be on the field of play, so it would rightly be disallowed.

The linesman will have been able to see the incident, and would have flagged for it, if there was an infringement.

You are making out up as you go along. First of all he was level - nonsense. As he is behind the keeper. 

he is either off side or is off the pitch . So given he scores he is either off side or re entered play. Unless it was a back pass 😂

11 minutes ago, Winchester White said:

PSG are playing some superb stuff

Got to be a scouser on VAR imagine if the penalty shout was other way round, the screeching would have been upsetting dogs all over the country.