Liverpool are awful

Carroll has some lovely French braids

I've just seen that and shook my head. What goes on in a blokes head to do that, and who does it for him? He needs a number 1 and a slap.

I wish they would fuck off with that bubble song

What a goal

Twas a belter

Fucking nailed on pen stuffy manc bastards

He's just a Vaz Te for the filth on a lucky streak.

He's just a Vaz Te for the filth on a lucky streak.

Stuffy cunts

Good lad Noble

Wtf was that corner about in injury time

 

Going for the 35 yard volley direct from a corner with seconds left ffs - ha ha

I take it back about Rashford, he looks top class, what a finish that was.

So the WHU style of football, much vaunted by their fans & the media, uses long high balls to Carroll's head. Yet they didn't like BSA as manager. Two-faced cnuts.

Keown got a bit of a dig in about that.

I felt by playing the West ham way early they were fairly toothless.

Some width and decent crosses and Carroll was more effective

Oh yeah I remember that, after Tomkins went on that run down the right, he said that probably wouldnt have happened under Allardyce.

 

He's a major spoon, Keown.

Keown kept banging on about how brave Tomkins was - he wasn't so brave when he turned his back for Fellaini's goal, was he?

West Ham will pay jus £2.5M a year to play at their new ground:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/36043808

 

which is a great deal generally and especially when, in contrast, they've paid Andy Carroll £4M a year for 3 years in return for 13 goals

This is a veritable scandal.

Keown kept banging on about how brave Tomkins was - he wasn't so brave when he turned his back for Fellaini's goal, was he?

 

Also described Rashford's goal as one of the best ever scored at Upton Park and Fellaini's as a deft finish.

 

Stick to diverting Djorkaeff's free kicks into the top corner Martin.

I find it amazing that it's cost 250 million pounds to convert it to football use!

Does seem somewhat cheap that rent.

Edited April 14, 201610 yr by Tonge moor green jacket

interesting comment:

"Someone renting the stadium for 25 days a year cannot be responsible for 365 days' running costs."

 

which is a sort of defence in that could argue they are paying 130k a game, but, are they really only going to rock up on match days and not be there the other 340 days?

 

ultimately though, you can't really fault West Ham, unless they refused to pay an original, much higher and justifiable demand for rent

I take it they will be using it for music events, boxing etc etc and West Ham don't get a penny of that additional revenue then

 

If that's the case and then it's not a horrendous deal

Do they get to keep all the gate receipts?

What happens when they drop out of prem? It'll be embarrassing with 30,000 plus empty seats, folk think Macrons a white elephant God knows what that stadium will become.

Do they get to keep all the gate receipts?

Seems so, though some money due from food sales

Seems so, though some money due from food sales

I bet they butter the hot dogs