Article in Sunday Express saying takeover imminent.....

I thought the only reason for them moving was that they wanted a bigger site to bring the academy and first team into 1 big complex? As we know that's not possible, we've had to develop lostock

 

With regards to planning at charnock, I don't think they'll get it anytime soon. The Camelot development a few hundred yards away has been plagued with planning issues.

 

http://m.chorley-guardian.co.uk/news/local/delight-at-no-vote-for-homes-on-camelot-site-1-6780977

 

Either way I'm just not sure Iles is barking up the right tree with that one

I'd think more chance of planning application being successful on the golf course than over the other side which is more green belt.

I'd think more chance of planning application being successful on the golf course than over the other side which is more green belt.

 

 

Wife reckons its hard to predict off any other examples as the rules are so complex.

I'd think more chance of planning application being successful on the golf course than over the other side which is more green belt.

Camelot was rejected as it was too big for the amenities in the area

 

Charnock golf club is a few hundred yards away and probably twice the size

A swathe of land that big would be a good location for a theme park, I reckon.

 

Whelanworld.

A swathe of land that big would be a good location for a theme park, I reckon.

 

Whelanworld.

 

Free plaster cast with every ticket.

Nixon tweeted that the offices now been sold paying off nucleus loan.

Nixon tweeted that the offices now been sold paying off nucleus loan.

 

I'm OK with that.

 

Are you?

Reports on LOV that Disley is a seperate bidder. Not part of Sports Shield.

Reports on LOV that Disley is a seperate bidder. Not part of Sports Shield.

Met Disley down the sauna recently

 

Good bloke

I'm OK with that.

 

Are you?

 

 

sounds positive

Reports on LOV that Disley is a seperate bidder. Not part of Sports Shield.

 

Jesus wept.

I'm OK with that.

 

Are you?

 

I'm happy loans paid off but what's next for them to sell off to cover their inefficiencies?

Met Disley down the sauna recently

 

Good bloke

Haha! Kinell!!

I'm happy loans paid off but what's next for them to sell off to cover their inefficiencies?

I think the point is that we aren't having to sell it for the tax bill, but to get rid of the highest interest debt, so possibly good news. Clearing our own shit rather than administration doing it for us.

Nixon tweeted that the offices now been sold paying off nucleus loan.

maybe the loan was a stumbling block for any potential buyer?

maybe the loan was a stumbling block for any potential buyer?

Think the big issue is the reported 1million shortfall every month to cover the running cost of the club. There is no easy fix for this problem.

Edited January 9, 201610 yr by Mounts Kipper

Would loan repayments not be part of the £1m per month?

Would Mark Davies' £110,000 a month salary be part of that?

 

Looks to me like an effort at cutting overheads is being made.

Selling off the offices is good

 

As would be the hotel

 

It means it's a fucking big job trying to flatten the ground for more shops if you have to buy from 3 parties

 

It should keep some of the vultures away and the stadium will remain a stadium even if we own it or not

Would loan repayments not be part of the £1m per month?

Would Mark Davies' £110,000 a month salary be part of that?

 

Looks to me like an effort at cutting overheads is being made.

Agreed were trying to reduce overheads but it's being done with the pressure of administration looming folk know that and does not put us in a strong bargaining position, this leads me to ask are we getting true value for selling our assets? Be that players or offices my view is that it is very doubtful we are. The offices were obviously bringing in steady regular income that's gone forever and that reduces our already low income stream going forward, let's see what goes next and if we continue to under sell all our assets.

Jesus wept.

Who'd have thought that a potential asset stripper would be interested in an asset rich, cash poor business?

Who'd have thought that a potential asset stripper would be interested in an asset rich, cash poor business?

And people are still questioning why it hasn't been sold!

I'm happy loans paid off but what's next for them to sell off to cover their inefficiencies?

Zac Clough.......

Would loan repayments not be part of the £1m per month?

Would Mark Davies' £110,000 a month salary be part of that?

 

 

Obviously

Obviously

Wages.. Employees national insurance contribution.. Insurance ( do teams insure players on an individual basis). Reckon it adds up. Probably get top 7 wages off and that deficit soon dissappers

Wages.. Employees national insurance contribution.. Insurance ( do teams insure players on an individual basis). Reckon it adds up. Probably get top 7 wages off and that deficit soon dissappers

 

I reckon the average wage of our top 7 earners must be close to £15k a week, possibly slightly higher but call it £15k.

 

Including NI contributions that's £6m a year, plus your insurance and any other related expenses maybe £7m!!

 

Get them off the wage bill and we'll be in a lot better position... You could argue we wouldn't even miss probably 5 of them.