Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Recommended Posts

Posted
25 minutes ago, Spider said:

The irony that he’s done nothing but moan about Labour for the last 6 months 😘

That’s not true.

I was moaning about them before the election as well.👍

Posted
2 hours ago, royal white said:

It is, it’s just (unsurprisingly) you don’t like the source it’s come from. Yes we know all politicians lie, I’ve said it on here numerous times. I’m not sure what’s happening you don’t get? 

 

Absolutely. 

Kent’s post sums it up perfectly

 They have to adapt & change. Starmer isn’t some sort of serial lier.

 It’s just odd that all you had to offer was ‘go look at Google’ when it’s nothing but headline sellers with no context 

Posted
2 hours ago, bolty58 said:

Maybe some of them are strident lefties pissed off with his recent conservative policies?

I know he pissed off millions with the winter fuel allowance shithousery.

Not wrong there Bolty, many lefties held their noses and voted Labour to get rid of the shower of shit that was the current Tories.

Starmer and the Labour party certainly weren't popular at MPF last weekend.

Posted
13 minutes ago, frank_spencer said:

Not wrong there Bolty, many lefties held their noses and voted Labour to get rid of the shower of shit that was the current Tories.

Starmer and the Labour party certainly weren't popular at MPF last weekend.

Good - better to get rid of the fringe. The hard left made us unelectable for too many years. Let them go to Green or other more fringe parties.

Give me a one nation Conservative over a militant lefty anyway of the week.

Posted
44 minutes ago, frank_spencer said:

Not wrong there Bolty, many lefties held their noses and voted Labour to get rid of the shower of shit that was the current Tories.

Starmer and the Labour party certainly weren't popular at MPF last weekend.

No surprise mate. Manchester Pigeon Fanciers were always stroppy fuckers.

Posted
1 hour ago, BobyBrno said:

That’s not true.

I was moaning about them before the election as well.👍

At least you can vote them out

Posted
1 hour ago, London Wanderer said:

Absolutely. 

Kent’s post sums it up perfectly

 They have to adapt & change. Starmer isn’t some sort of serial lier.

 It’s just odd that all you had to offer was ‘go look at Google’ when it’s nothing but headline sellers with no context 

“Google Starmer lies and you will PROBABLY find your answers there”

As has been pointed out on here previously, you do seem to struggle with reading. 

I’m not sure what context you need? Starmer has told plenty of lies, this could be a reason why some people have lost faith in him. And rightly so. 

Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, royal white said:

“Google Starmer lies and you will PROBABLY find your answers there”

As has been pointed out on here previously, you do seem to struggle with reading. 

I’m not sure what context you need? Starmer has told plenty of lies, this could be a reason why some people have lost faith in him. And rightly so. 

'You can't read' 😂 Aaaaaand you're off

But we didn't find them did we 👍

If you can't understand why context is important then there's not much point discussing whether Kier is a liar or not. 

Edited by London Wanderer
Posted
4 hours ago, Bertie said:

I suppose it’s inevitable (that politicians lie).  Suspect it’s part of their DNA and character types in pursuit of their ultimate goal of power, often at any cost.  Frustrating as erodes public trust in all of them. I do think Starmer whilst not perfect is less guilty than most, and on the whole seems committed to public service (accepting we can all agree/disagree with some/all of his policies). Still early days I guess.  I was gutted when Boris descended into a pathological liar at the end trying to save his skin - felt he could have done great things for the country.

I’m biased of course, but back on topic the orange guy really is different gravy when it comes to blatant lies….

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_or_misleading_statements_by_Donald_Trump

I don't want to derail a thread but I cannot let the Boris claim go without saying he didn't descend into a pathological liar, he is/was/always has been. He couldn't run a bath never mind a country.

Posted
14 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:

'You can't read' 😂 Aaaaaand you're off

But we didn't find them did we 👍

If you can't understand why context is important then there's not much point discussing whether Kier is a liar or not. 

You didn’t no. Others probably have (though they probably didn’t need to ask on a footy forum as to why Keir Starmer has lost a lot of support and is now below Boris in the rankings.) 

 

As to “discussing whether Keir* is a liar or not” there’s not as most sane people know he’s a liar. 

Posted
15 minutes ago, royal white said:

You didn’t no. Others probably have (though they probably didn’t need to ask on a footy forum as to why Keir Starmer has lost a lot of support and is now below Boris in the rankings.) 

 

As to “discussing whether Keir* is a liar or not” there’s not as most sane people know he’s a liar. 

I've no idea why you think Kent's question is needless. Seems reasonable to me. Starmer's decreasing ratings aren't explained by simply saying he's a liar. That offers no context and ignores many other reasons. Personally, I think he's made u turns and some unpopular decisions that have annoyed folk on the right and left. 

All you had to offer to a normal question was some laughing emojis. When asked to explain further you just said 'look at google'. Now you're off on one telling folk they're struggling read 😄 classic RW. 

Back to the point - which lies do you think have most effected Starmer's approval ratings? 

I've not seen the most recent ones, but there's little here to suggest he's seen much differently to others. 

https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/boost-keir-starmer-ratings-improve-public-think-his-government-are-doing-poor-job-issues-matter

Posted
2 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:

I've no idea why you think Kent's question is needless. Seems reasonable to me. Starmer's decreasing ratings aren't explained by simply saying he's a liar. That offers no context and ignores many other reasons. Personally, I think he's made u turns and some unpopular decisions that have annoyed folk on the right and left. 

All you had to offer to a normal question was some laughing emojis. When asked to explain further you just said 'look at google'. Now you're off on one telling folk they're struggling read 😄 classic RW. 

Back to the point - which lies do you think have most effected Starmer's approval ratings? 

I've not seen the most recent ones, but there's little here to suggest he's seen much differently to others. 

https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/boost-keir-starmer-ratings-improve-public-think-his-government-are-doing-poor-job-issues-matter

You’ve kind of answered your own question. If you’re making unpopular decisions, u turns, lies what do you think will happen to your popularity? 

Obviously the tax rises won’t make you very popular, saying you’re going to smash the gangs whilst record numbers cross the channel again won’t help Your cause. Lying constantly in PMQs isn’t going to improve your popularity either. 
 

Like I said the lies are PROBABLY a reason,  you’re better off asking those Labour supporters who now don’t have any confidence in the person they voted for if you want their reasoning .

 

Posted
16 minutes ago, Winchester White said:

The fact many still think Boris Johnson is the answer probably tells you all you need to know why Starmer isn't popular.

I'll take your Boris Johnson and raise you a Nigel Farage

Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, kent_white said:

I'll take your Boris Johnson and raise you a Nigel Farage

It is a bit bizarre how all these people who have gone off Starmer because of his "lies" suddenly prefer the biggest liars that have ever operated on the British political stage.

Edited by Cheese
Posted
3 minutes ago, Cheese said:

It is a bit bizarre how all these people who have gone off Starmer because of his "lies" suddenly prefer the biggest liars that have ever operated on the British political stage.

Who are these people you talk about? 

Posted
2 hours ago, royal white said:

You’ve kind of answered your own question. If you’re making unpopular decisions, u turns, lies what do you think will happen to your popularity? 

Obviously the tax rises won’t make you very popular, saying you’re going to smash the gangs whilst record numbers cross the channel again won’t help Your cause. Lying constantly in PMQs isn’t going to improve your popularity either. 
 

Like I said the lies are PROBABLY a reason,  you’re better off asking those Labour supporters who now don’t have any confidence in the person they voted for if you want their reasoning .

 

 Yourself & others are confusing unfulfilled promises & unpopular decisions with lying then. A U turn isn’t either, it’s a change of decision. 

Fairly high expectations you’ve had for his first year in office as well mate.

He hasn’t come across as a regular liar.

Which ones specifically has he told? 

Posted
4 hours ago, royal white said:

“Google Starmer lies and you will PROBABLY find your answers there”

As has been pointed out on here previously, you do seem to struggle with reading. 

I’m not sure what context you need? Starmer has told plenty of lies, this could be a reason why some people have lost faith in him. And rightly so. 

Also harks back the Trump thread, and folk not wanting King Charles to meet Trump, and saying he probably wouldn't want to.

Given that Starmer has previously stated he is a republican, maybe Charles didn't want to meet him neither.

He previously said it was the law that trans women were women.

He said he wouldn't hit farmers.

Could go on, but it isn't necessary. 

They all do, and they will be judged accordingly. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Also harks back the Trump thread, and folk not wanting King Charles to meet Trump, and saying he probably wouldn't want to.

Given that Starmer has previously stated he is a republican, maybe Charles didn't want to meet him neither.

He previously said it was the law that trans women were women.

He said he wouldn't hit farmers.

Could go on, but it isn't necessary. 

They all do, and they will be judged accordingly. 

Will it be Lee Anderson for deputy PM 💜 ?

A top honest bloke who only ever speaks the truth, just like Nigel.

Posted
Just now, London Wanderer said:

Will it be Lee Anderson for deputy PM 💜 ?

A top honest bloke who only ever speaks the truth, just like Nigel.

Whatabout Whatabout whatabout 

Posted
5 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:


Similar reasons in here as to why Reform wouldn’t fix things either 

Speaking of liars this clown would make a cracking politician. 

Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:


Similar reasons in here as to why Reform wouldn’t fix things either 

An interesting channel. Don’t agree with everything he says, but he makes some decent analysis. Has experience in the sector 

Edited by London Wanderer
Posted
6 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:

Aye

Talking about the leading opposition in a discussion about the current PM 🙈

Nice try

Talking about why people don’t like Starmer now, nothing to do with LH. 
 

Nice try 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.