Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Recommended Posts

Posted
20 minutes ago, royal white said:

It didn’t confuse me, you said they were guilty of both when clearly they weren’t. 

Being guilty isnt necessarily being found guilty in a court of law

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, royal white said:

The term you used was kids, kids is exclusive to kids. Others questioned the term nonce you could ask them for their preference. 

I'm asking you

I said

They're all nonces who abuse women and kids because they think they can

Nonce is not exclusive to kids in my eyes but is in yours

So what do YOU call a man found guilty of sexually abusing women? 

And yeah ok let's ask @gonzo and @Sweep what they call them too 

And then we'll ask them if that's what they think trump is

You don't have to wait for them to answer though

What do you call a man who is guilty of sexually abusing women and if you don't think trump is that type man why not? 

Don't forget now, a court said he was and made him pay for it 

Posted

The word nonce allegedly originates from Wakefield Prison which was and still is the home of many sex offenders. 

In the days before they were located on separate wings they had to be exercised separately. The prison officers would write on their cell card NONCE.

This was an abbreviation of Not On Normal Courtyard Exercise.

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Zico said:

I'm asking you

I said

They're all nonces who abuse women and kids because they think they can

Nonce is not exclusive to kids in my eyes but is in yours

So what do YOU call a man found guilty of sexually abusing women? 

And yeah ok let's ask @gonzo and @Sweep what they call them too 

And then we'll ask them if that's what they think trump is

You don't have to wait for them to answer though

What do you call a man who is guilty of sexually abusing women and if you don't think trump is that type man why not? 

Don't forget now, a court said he was and made him pay for it 

I’m not interested in the word nonce, I’m not sure why you think I say it’s inclusive to only kids? I was interested in the now edited sentence that suggested Trump abused women and kids, hence my reply “when and where did he abuse kids”

Edited by royal white
Posted
13 minutes ago, Casino said:

Being guilty isnt necessarily being found guilty in a court of law

 

Trump being sent to a civil court in NYC would be like sending Gary Neville to a civil court in Liverpool. He’s getting found guilty regardless. Fuck all evidence to go off just a farce really. No Wonder the police don’t get involved .

Posted
1 minute ago, royal white said:

I’m not interested in the word nonce, I was interested in the now edited sentence that suggested Trump abused women and kids, hence my reply “when and where did he abuse kids”

Yeah so I thought we'd since made it clear between us that's not what I meant so no need to dwell on it

As I said I edited it to avoid confusion but here we are still

So if you want to clutch on to that particular straw you can

But if you want to move on to just trump and just abusing women I'll be here when you're ready

Posted
Just now, Zico said:

Yeah so I thought we'd since made it clear between us that's not what I meant so no need to dwell on it

As I said I edited it to avoid confusion but here we are still

So if you want to clutch on to that particular straw you can

But if you want to move on to just trump and just abusing women I'll be here when you're ready

Well you keep making things up like “a nonce in exclusive only to kids in your eyes” I don’t need to clutch anything when you keep making things up 🤷🏻

Posted
1 minute ago, royal white said:

Was Micheal Jackson ever found guilty of sex offences? 

Bubbles just shat in the witness box and threw it around the courtroom.

Doesnt mean he was innocent

Posted
20 minutes ago, royal white said:

Well you keep making things up like “a nonce in exclusive only to kids in your eyes” I don’t need to clutch anything when you keep making things up 🤷🏻

So do you think he's a nonce or not?

Take this as a chance to be clear on the matter so no one can be accused of lying or making things up further down the line 

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Zico said:

So do you think he's a nonce or not?

Take this as a chance to be clear on the matter so no one can be accused of lying or making things up further down the line 

No. 

Edited by royal white
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Zico said:

Why not

Because a Women who didn’t know what year she was assaulted, and who’s only evidence was a photo of her and The Don and confessions off 2 of her mates isn’t quite convincing enough for me. 

Edited by royal white
Posted
3 minutes ago, royal white said:

Because a Women who didn’t know what year she was assaulted, and who’s only evidence was a photo of her and Trump and confessions off 2 of her mates isn’t quite convincing enough for me. 

What about this?

E Jean Carroll: Jury finds Trump sexually abused writer in NY department store - BBC News https://share.google/AETqG4dRo1H753cbD

Posted
1 minute ago, Zico said:

What about this?

E Jean Carroll: Jury finds Trump sexually abused writer in NY department store - BBC News https://share.google/AETqG4dRo1H753cbD

Not sure what your point in that post is but one paragraph stands out to me. 
 

The standard of proof in civil cases is lower than in criminal cases, meaning that jurors were only required to find that it was more likely than not that Mr Trump assaulted Ms Carroll.

Posted
6 hours ago, royal white said:

The memory of some of these “victims” needs to be applauded. Apparent offences taking place in the 70s and 80s  suddenly become fresh in their mind when he decides to run for president. Amazing. 

Fck me that's a new level of daftness right there.

Been the RW show tonight hasn't it.

People report crimes decades later all the time. For all sorts of valid reasons, one of them being trauma.

We've some historic convictions to cancel then going by this logic. 

Posted
Just now, London Wanderer said:

Fck me that's a new level of daftness right there.

Been the RW show tonight hasn't it.

People report crimes decades later all the time. For all sorts of valid reasons, one of them being trauma.

We've some historic convictions to cancel then going by this logic. 

Yes 18 all At a similar time 😂 brilliant 

Posted
13 minutes ago, royal white said:

Not sure what your point in that post is but one paragraph stands out to me. 
 

The standard of proof in civil cases is lower than in criminal cases, meaning that jurors were only required to find that it was more likely than not that Mr Trump assaulted Ms Carroll.

My point is he was found guilty and had to pay out

Ok

Bear with my because there's a point here 

Are the following in your opinion guilty

It's just a game, I'm not going to edit anything or accuse you of making things up, am just curious 

If you don't want to play just say "no", otherwise say yes or no to the following

If no, say why

 

Jimmy Saville - nonce

OJ Simpson - murder 

Michael Jackson - nonce 

Prince Andrew - nonce

Harvey Weinstein - nonce

Rolf Harris - nonce

Max Clifford - nonce 

Jeffrey Epstein - nonce 

Ghislaine Maxwell - nonce 

Jack The Ripper - murder

Donald Trump - nonce 

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, royal white said:

Yes 18 all At a similar time 😂 brilliant 

He's been accused and reported for similar things before he ran for president 👍

You're argument doesn't add up. it's a very odd thing to blindly defend someone on. 

What makes you so sure he's never sexual assaulted a woman before?

Edited by London Wanderer
Posted
1 minute ago, Zico said:

My point is he was found guilty and had to pay out

Ok

Bear with my because there's a point here 

Are the following in your opinion guilty

It's just a game, I'm not going to edit anything or accuse you of making things up, am just curious 

If you don't want to play just say "no", otherwise say yes or no to the following

If no, say why

 

Jimmy Saville - nonce

OJ Simpson - murder 

Michael Jackson - nonce 

Prince Andrew - nonce

Harvey Weinstein - nonce

Rolf Harris - nonce

Max Clifford - nonce 

Ok so your view is The Don is a nonce because he was found guilty in a civil case in NYC. 
 

Fair enough that’s your view. 
 

MJ was cleared yet you say he’s a nonce. 🤷🏻

Posted
1 minute ago, London Wanderer said:

He's been accused and reported for similar things before he ran for president 👍

You're argument doesn't add up. it's a very odd thing to blindly defend someone on. 

What makes you so sure he's never sexual assaulted a woman before?

I know. And he’s been reported on a lot more since (weird hey) 

My argument does add up. If he was such a violent sex offender then why isn’t he in jail, why is it only civil cases? 
 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.