Last I heard, it was court tomorrow

 

ST and Lies reported 3, including Heathcotes mob

 

KA said that was old news, leaving 2

 

 

Now, I can see HMRC is definitely a club issue,but the other is Sport Shield

 

If we assume KA can deal with HMRC debt - I'd have been happier if he had sorted that one already, tbf- that 'just' leaves SS and blumarble

 

If the court agrees to wind up SS, do we know what that means and also the impact on BWFC

Edited May 21, 20179 yr by Casino

Prefer the embargo gone.

Worthy's fridge has been fixed?

all makes very good sense to me.

He said that having an acv on the stadium makes it more difficult to raise finance.

 

Good enough reason to fuck it off for me

 

Worthy's fridge has been fixed?[/quono. Bought a new one, 67 reg

And where is the evidence that Anderson wants to flog off assets?

 

As far as I can tell he's done nowt but try and buy back ones that were previously flogged.

 

has he tried to buy back Clough and Holding?

He said that having an acv on the stadium makes it more difficult to raise finance.

 

Good enough reason to fuck it off for me

 

 

Great! lets borrow more money allow him to mortgage the clubs future. If he does not want to put money in I would be happier if he tried to sell to someone who has. 

Edited September 14, 20178 yr by Mounts Kipper

Can't be a signing as the squads full isn't it?

Can't be a signing as the squads full isn't it?

It'll be his other son joining as director

It'll be his other son joining as director

let's hope he doesn't have to get a taxi from bradshawgate again ????

Great! lets borrow more money allow him to mortgage the clubs future. If he does not want to put money in I would be happier if he tried to sell to someone who has.

How do you think most clubs raise money? There's only so many Abramovics to go round.

The supporters trust's relevance is dwindling by the minute.

The supporters trust's relevance is dwindling by the minute.

 

 

I would say exactly the opposite and thats backed up by the number of new member joining up, seems folk outside of WW clique understand why it is important.

Edited September 14, 20178 yr by Mounts Kipper

The supporters trust's relevance is dwindling by the minute.

How?

has he tried to buy back Clough and Holding?

 

You're a bit of a dick aren't you

You're a bit of a dick aren't you

Bury fan.

. If he does not want to put money in I would be happier if he tried to sell to someone who has. 

 

I think we'd all be happy if he could sell to someone who has money to put it......the problem is, I don't think it's a very big queue at present

Embargone!

I would say exactly the opposite and thats backed up by the number of new member joining up, seems folk outside of WW clique understand why it is important.

 

A genuine question, how many members does the ST have? - I wouldn't have a clue if it's 50, 500 or 5000 to be honest.

 

After all the "bad press" that the ST get, it's amazing if they have loads of new members signing up, if they have, then fair play to them

Sweep, I didn't think there is even a queue , big or otherwise

The st will sort itself out and become relevant in time.

Or shrivel away to nothing.

 

Not going to bother today. Its a day for raising a glass.

A genuine question, how many members does the ST have? - I wouldn't have a clue if it's 50, 500 or 5000 to be honest.

 

After all the "bad press" that the ST get, it's amazing if they have loads of new members signing up, if they have, then fair play to them

I've asked numerous tines for an answer to that question

 

They won't say

I've asked numerous tines for an answer to that question

 

They won't say

 

Surely they have to publish the number members if asked - they can;t ask the club to be fully transparent, and then not be so themselves, especially as they have taken tenners of people

 

The fact they're not answering would probably lead one to believe the number is closer to either 50 or 500 than 5000

Aye

 

Have they published any accounts, yet?

I've asked numerous tines for an answer to that question

 

They won't say

I'm informed 3500 paid up members, that'll be folk who continue to pay their yearly dues.

I thought the yearly contributions had been scrapped

 

Thus meaning they can continue to claim to have a mandate from everybody who ever tipped up a tenner

 

Fwiw I don't believe for a minute that 3500 folk paid a tenner

 

But I'll be happily proved wrong if somebody can point me to the accounts