An interesting bit that Baker mentioned but wasn't in the clip above was that it was his performance at the 1922 committee, referenced in the headmasters office part, that made him come to this conclusion. One that if shared with others within his cabal will probably be the nail on the coffin. 

Have i heard right that the met will issue no further partygate fines in the run up to the locals as it may affect the vote

Fucking hell

2 hours ago, Nowack said:

An interesting bit that Baker mentioned but wasn't in the clip above was that it was his performance at the 1922 committee, referenced in the headmasters office part, that made him come to this conclusion. One that if shared with others within his cabal will probably be the nail on the coffin. 

Indeed, that was probably the most damning part of his statement. 4:29 in this clip

 

Intresting to look at the ministrial code - Selflessness, Integrity, Objectivity, Accountability, Openess, Honesty and Leadership. Johnson's scoresheet isn't looking great....

1 hour ago, Not in Crawley said:

Intresting to look at the ministrial code - Selflessness, Integrity, Objectivity, Accountability, Openess, Honesty and Leadership. Johnson's scoresheet isn't looking great....

He scores zero on all those qualities. 

 

 

10 minutes ago, mickbrown said:

 

 

 Is that moron permanently fucking pissed or what?

24 minutes ago, mickbrown said:

 

 

I you wonder why my lot where up in arms when she got the gig. Christ on a bike.

4 hours ago, Not in Crawley said:

Intresting to look at the ministrial code - Selflessness, Integrity, Objectivity, Accountability, Openess, Honesty and Leadership. Johnson's scoresheet isn't looking great....

The Committee to look at his position has 7 members.

The chairman (Bryant and one other) are Labour.

One is SNP.

There are 4 Conservatives: Sir Bernard Jenkin, who is an independent-minded Tory, one who is an aid to Liz Truss, one from a red wall seat, and one who is a lawyer with a future as a minister.

Any or all could vote against Johnson; in fact I would say it is more likely to be unanimous against him than to be 4-3 in his favour.

7 minutes ago, MalcolmW said:

The Committee to look at his position has 7 members.

The chairman (Bryant and one other) are Labour.

One is SNP.

There are 4 Conservatives: Sir Bernard Jenkin, who is an independent-minded Tory, one who is an aid to Liz Truss, one from a red wall seat, and one who is a lawyer with a future as a minister.

Any or all could vote against Johnson; in fact I would say it is more likely to be unanimous against him than to be 4-3 in his favour.

Hasn't one of the Labour Chairs declared himself unsuitable because of his well-documented personal dislike of Johnson?

Edited April 22, 20224 yr by Cheese

I thought we’d moved on.  
 

8 minutes ago, Escobarp said:

I thought we’d moved on.  
 

Mate some sad fuckers do status updates on Facebook about boris & the government, crazy! 

18 minutes ago, Cheese said:

Hasn't one of the Labour Chairs declared himself unsuitable because of his well-documented personal dislike of Johnson?

True.

6 minutes ago, radcliffe white said:

Mate some sad fuckers do status updates on Facebook about boris & the government, crazy! 

I suspect the sad fuckers on Facebook are looking at their kindred spirits on here and trying to up there game to match them 😬

42 minutes ago, Cheese said:

Hasn't one of the Labour Chairs declared himself unsuitable because of his well-documented personal dislike of Johnson?

Im surprised they can find 7 that don't dislike him

1 hour ago, MalcolmW said:

The Committee to look at his position has 7 members.

The chairman (Bryant and one other) are Labour.

One is SNP.

There are 4 Conservatives: Sir Bernard Jenkin, who is an independent-minded Tory, one who is an aid to Liz Truss, one from a red wall seat, and one who is a lawyer with a future as a minister.

Any or all could vote against Johnson; in fact I would say it is more likely to be unanimous against him than to be 4-3 in his favour.

The chairman always has to be a member of the opposition.

4 minutes ago, Offshore said:

The chairman always has to be a member of the opposition.

That is how I understand it and the make up of the committee has to reflect the Parliamentary representations.

But I thought Bryant was very unprofessional when interviewed on Channel 4 news last night saying that Johnson was "Toast". Nowt like an impartial chairman eh?

He purposely removed himself from the role due to his on the record comments. I think he is allowed a bit of a flounce now. 

Didn't know that, who is going to be the Chairman now?

Angie?

 

1 hour ago, radcliffe white said:

Mate some sad fuckers do status updates on Facebook about boris & the government, crazy! 

You obviously prefer people posting pictures of their tea than actually giving a shit about our amazing nation being run by a cabal of narcissist wankers.

To each their own.

No doubt if another party formed the next government you would simply wait patiently for 5 years to cast your vote without criticising them if you thought they were utter shit?

1 minute ago, Spider said:

You obviously prefer people posting pictures of their tea than actually giving a shit about our amazing nation being run by a cabal of narcissist wankers.

To each their own.

No doubt if another party formed the next government you would simply wait patiently for 5 years to cast your vote without criticising them if you thought they were utter shit?

Easy tiger it’s Friday have a beer 

1 minute ago, radcliffe white said:

Easy tiger it’s Friday have a beer 

Just about to

question stands though

Can we not criticise our leader?

because there may be a time when you want to

1 minute ago, Spider said:

Just about to

question stands though

Can we not criticise our leader?

because there may be a time when you want to

Course you can

Personally debates don’t end well on social media as folk slog it out for nothing just turns into who can shout the loudest and it doesn’t solve anything apart from blood pressure going up 

59 minutes ago, radcliffe white said:

Course you can

Personally debates don’t end well on social media as folk slog it out for nothing just turns into who can shout the loudest and it doesn’t solve anything apart from blood pressure going up 

Is the correct answer.

#ourleader

4 hours ago, Escobarp said:

I thought we’d moved on.  
 

People will move on once he's fucked off.