What is that "mate" of mine Sadiq Khan trying to achieve ?

 

You lost you demented little cretin, get over it and concentrate on your job you terrorist sympathiser.

9 hours ago, royal white said:

Why when he’s not doing anything wrong? It’s a little different when you have a working class Rochdale woman who says she’s representing the working classes yet blatantly takes the piss. And I reckon Farage has probably been scrutinised more than most MPs here the years. 

Rayner - Her house in th’north is in a Trust for her son who suffered some serious complications at birth due to a fuck up in care. Rayner had a financial interest in that house. So say she had £100k in there and they had used £100k of the compensation. The Trust beneficiary is her kid but she is named on the documents. Rayner cashed her £100k and used the money for new house. She is still named on the Trust but now has no  financial interest in the northern house. She bought the new house for herself but got into trouble because still named on the Trust. It is a fuck up but pretty complicated. The fact she did not get full and proper advice is just stupid. Not sure why as a northern MP she was buying down south either. 

Farage said he had bought a house in Clacton but has now said it was not him but his g/f buying the house. Which let’s be honest is them using the rules to get round stamp duty. Unless she was always planning to move to Clacton. 
 

Did you know when Farage met his GF she ‘was working as a waitress in a cocktail bar.’ Someone should write a song about that. 

You can say you're from anywhere if you've ditched your passport on the way.

JSL.

All these Black as the ace of spades Afghans kicking about

7 minutes ago, Ani said:

Rayner - Her house in th’north is in a Trust for her son who suffered some serious complications at birth due to a fuck up in care. Rayner had a financial interest in that house. So say she had £100k in there and they had used £100k of the compensation. The Trust beneficiary is her kid but she is named on the documents. Rayner cashed her £100k and used the money for new house. She is still named on the Trust but now has no  financial interest in the northern house. She bought the new house for herself but got into trouble because still named on the Trust. It is a fuck up but pretty complicated. The fact she did not get full and proper advice is just stupid. Not sure why as a northern MP she was buying down south either. 

Farage said he had bought a house in Clacton but has now said it was not him but his g/f buying the house. Which let’s be honest is them using the rules to get round stamp duty. Unless she was always planning to move to Clacton. 
 

Did you know when Farage met his GF she ‘was working as a waitress in a cocktail bar.’ Someone should write a song about that. 

So basically He’s more switched on than her. Which is blatantly obvious. 

59 minutes ago, BobyBrno said:

There we go then. 

Patriot appeasement 

1 hour ago, BobyBrno said:

There we go then. 

Well what a shocker! Who’d of thunk it hey! 🙄

Have

1 hour ago, royal white said:

So basically He’s more switched on than her. Which is blatantly obvious. 

Not really her attempt at tax avoidance is much more complicated than his. 
 

The fact he was interviewed multiple times saying he was buying a house and is now saying he did not mean that shows what a con on the whole thing is. 
 

The actions of them both highlight how people with money will find a way round paying tax that ‘normal’ folk just do not think about. 

2 hours ago, BobyBrno said:

There we go then. 

former home sec

and unfortunately for israel, lammy doesn't get to decide

even his/our position is that 'yeah they are killing 1000s of innocents' but theyre not trying to

some comfort i'm sure to the poor fuckers being being blown to bits

 

In a letter, dated 1 September, he wrote that "the crime of genocide occurs only where there is specific 'intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group.'

"The government has not concluded that Israel is acting with that intent."

 

 

16 minutes ago, Ani said:

Not really her attempt at tax avoidance is much more complicated than his. 
 

The fact he was interviewed multiple times saying he was buying a house and is now saying he did not mean that shows what a con on the whole thing is. 
 

The actions of them both highlight how people with money will find a way round paying tax that ‘normal’ folk just do not think about. 

and that great patriot tice has been chucking bundles of cash into offshore trusts for 30 years

proper patriot

11 minutes ago, Casino said:

and that great patriot tice has been chucking bundles of cash into offshore trusts for 30 years

proper patriot

Deputy PM has been fiddling her taxes.

But but but but whatabout that party with 4 MPs 😂

12 minutes ago, Casino said:

former home sec

and unfortunately for israel, lammy doesn't get to decide

even his/our position is that 'yeah they are killing 1000s of innocents' but theyre not trying to

some comfort i'm sure to the poor fuckers being being blown to bits

 

In a letter, dated 1 September, he wrote that "the crime of genocide occurs only where there is specific 'intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group.'

"The government has not concluded that Israel is acting with that intent."

 

 

I have no idea which ‘side’ we are on at the moment. We certainly seem very keen not to upset Israel 

16 minutes ago, Casino said:

former home sec

and unfortunately for israel, lammy doesn't get to decide

even his/our position is that 'yeah they are killing 1000s of innocents' but theyre not trying to

some comfort i'm sure to the poor fuckers being being blown to bits

 

In a letter, dated 1 September, he wrote that "the crime of genocide occurs only where there is specific 'intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group.'

"The government has not concluded that Israel is acting with that intent."

 

 

But he’s right. Not often I would say that about Lammy. 

28 minutes ago, royal white said:

But he’s right. Not often I would say that about Lammy. 

well, we shall see if hes right

neither lammy, nor you or I, decide if we can call the massacre of 10s of thousands genocide

2 minutes ago, Casino said:

well, we shall see if hes right

neither lammy, nor you or I, decide if we can call the massacre of 10s of thousands genocide

It’s in your post. “The government have concluded” or are you suggesting they’re lying? To be fair they have got form like, 

they will have an opinion, which they have expressed - i suspect its about keeping israel on side, which imo stinks but maybe a necessary evil

however UK govt won't be deciding

id like to think this isn't beyond you

7 minutes ago, Casino said:

they will have an opinion, which they have expressed - i suspect its about keeping israel on side, which imo stinks but maybe a necessary evil

however UK govt won't be deciding

id like to think this isn't beyond you

As have other governments. There has been no ruling by the courts of genocide being committed by Isreal at present. So it looks like lammy has got this one right and a few lads on a  footy forum have unsurprisingly got it wrong. 

38 minutes ago, Casino said:

they will have an opinion, which they have expressed - i suspect its about keeping israel on side, which imo stinks but maybe a necessary evil

however UK govt won't be deciding

id like to think this isn't beyond you

Some governments have said they think it amounts to such. Some haven’t.

 Time will tell

 Has to be a strong case for ethnic cleansing for me

Edited September 9, 2025Sep 9 by London Wanderer

43 minutes ago, royal white said:

As have other governments. There has been no ruling by the courts of genocide being committed by Isreal at present. So it looks like lammy has got this one right and a few lads on a  footy forum have unsurprisingly got it wrong. 

youre clearly struggling

 

freds in court

rose says hes innocent

 

lets fuck the judge and jury off as hes clearly done nowt wrong

 

or we ask a few more people and then decide

4 hours ago, BobyBrno said:

There we go then. 

They just get sucked into emotive language. Started with the proliferation of the 'racist' put down and is now in widespread use as a tactic to try to get a result/silence the opposition.

The general public are on to it and over it.

We all know the Gaza mission is over when Gaza city is routed and what is left of the hostages are recovered. How many October 7th's did they say they were going to launch?

1 hour ago, Ani said:

I have no idea which ‘side’ we are on at the moment. We certainly seem very keen not to upset Israel 

Good. How it should be.

37 minutes ago, Casino said:

youre clearly struggling

 

freds in court

rose says hes innocent

 

lets fuck the judge and jury off as hes clearly done nowt wrong

 

or we ask a few more people and then decide

He's not struggling at all.

RW, like a few others on here, will back Israel to the hilt no matter how many innocent Muslims they kill.

44 minutes ago, Casino said:

youre clearly struggling

 

freds in court

rose says hes innocent

 

lets fuck the judge and jury off as hes clearly done nowt wrong

 

or we ask a few more people and then decide

So all those people on here who have been screaming genocide are wrong. That’s their opinion. The democratically elected government of ours have been asked to give theirs, they don’t think there is. Now I might be wrong here (but I’m not) but I’m sure our government have quite a bit to go off to come To their conclusion. But what we can all agree on at the moment is there’s no confirmed genocide. 
 

Out of interest who are the few more people you want to ask? 

8 minutes ago, DazBob said:

He's not struggling at all.

RW, like a few others on here, will back Israel to the hilt no matter how many innocent Muslims they kill.

Yes something like that. You depressing nonce 

4 hours ago, royal white said:

Cheese thinks they all get sent back the day their application is refused.

 

Where did Cheese say they get sent back on the day? Is that in a previous post? 

2 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:

Where did Cheese say they get sent back on the day? Is that in a previous post? 

Understandably you’ve misunderstood the post. 🙄