Love him or hate him the lads got some nuts, caught this lad a cracker here.

 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_BNP2y7ELus&feature=youtu.be

Too busy elsewhere mate. Your were there though eh?

 

Completely different as well.  Majority of the football stuff is historic and just coming out.  The grooming gangs are happening here and now.

 

Both should be highlighted like but reckon I've read more about the football noncing.

I was wondering how long.

 

The 'go to' response every fucking time.

 

A disgrace what has been happening for decades and authorities have been frightened to act because of that one little word. Quick and easy to use against Tommy Robinson but not against the filthy scum who perpetrated such acts against under age girls who, in the main, have been white Anglo Saxons.

Go to response because it’s true

 

Fuck’s sake you don’t help yourself Bolty; the Anglo Saxon period ended about a millennia ago, give or take 50 years...

 

Grooming gangs are most definitely a problem - of that I have no doubt

 

Robinson is an attention seeking fuckwit. Of that I also have no doubt. and he is not the answer.

Far right or far left. You push the boundaries you will get nicked. Publicity stunt that only had a win, win outcome. Don't feel too sorry or outraged for him.

Edited May 27, 20188 yr by Underpants

Completely different as well. Majority of the football stuff is historic and just coming out. The grooming gangs are happening here and now.

 

Both should be highlighted like but reckon I've read more about the football noncing.

.

 

There ain't been any films about the football cases, starring Maxine Peake yet.

.

 

There ain't been any films about the football cases, starring Maxine Peake yet.

The Bummed United

.

 

There ain't been any films about the football cases, starring Maxine Peake yet.

 

No but the warning signs were there for anyone who watched Jossy's Giants

Bender Like Beckham

Both should be highlighted like but reckon I've read more about the football noncing.

Really? There was quite a bit about that coach but that's been about it I reckon. But for about a months worth of headlines when it was all coming out. In terms of column inches - I reckon far more has been written about Rotherham and other incidences like it.

Edited May 27, 20188 yr by kent_white

Barry Bennell - I put Barry Bannan above at first and had to do a quick edit!

Really? There was quite a bit about that coach but that's been about it I reckon. But for about a months worth of headlines when it was all coming out. In terms of column inches - I reckon far more has been written about Rotherham and other incidences like it.

 

From my end aye, but I do tend to read sports news feeds before any other so probably not got a wide perspective on it.

 

Either way, it's still under-reported imo.

 

I get the impression that the mainstream media are under recommendation to not turn it into a race thing - as I say, I get why but it so often is in similar circumstances.  I'm sure you get where I'm coming from?

 

Wasn't there a link on here a while back showing that the press largely ignore racist crimes against whites compared to acts against non-whites.   Again, it's just the balance I'm after and a true reflection of what's going on.

Go to response because it’s true

 

Fuck’s sake you don’t help yourself Bolty; the Anglo Saxon period ended about a millennia ago, give or take 50 years...

 

Grooming gangs are most definitely a problem - of that I have no doubt

 

Robinson is an attention seeking fuckwit. Of that I also have no doubt. and he is not the answer.

 

 

You're losing the plot son. That comment was fuck all to do with a few hundred years ago. Merely a comment on what most of us are and what the abused are in the grooming cases.

 

Before you get on your high horse (yet again), be informed that as a huge fan of natural selection, I believe that the mixing of peoples is a proven good thing. You only have to look all around you in the British Isles. We are a fine mix of original Anglo Celts (and others) historically crossed with Viking, French, Italian and German influences and this propelled us to an empire on which the sun never set at one stage. In more recent times (since WW2) we have introduced, both by chance and intention, other influences - the vast majority of which have been good and beneficial.

 

None of this, however, has anything to do with what we are on about here. Two cultures. One primitive which believes that young (and often under age in our law) females, preferably not of their own faith, are sexual playthings to be groomed and passed around like a peace pipe. Another, institutional - government agencies too petrified to act because of folk like your good self and your fondness for levelling the 'r' word at people the second a discussion prods your 'white privileged' sensitivities.

Tommy Robinson and Donald Trump fanboy.

 

You're a strange, strange fella.

You're losing the plot son. That comment was fuck all to do with a few hundred years ago. Merely a comment on what most of us are and what the abused are in the grooming cases.

 

Before you get on your high horse (yet again), be informed that as a huge fan of natural selection, I believe that the mixing of peoples is a proven good thing. You only have to look all around you in the British Isles. We are a fine mix of original Anglo Celts (and others) historically crossed with Viking, French, Italian and German influences and this propelled us to an empire on which the sun never set at one stage. In more recent times (since WW2) we have introduced, both by chance and intention, other influences - the vast majority of which have been good and beneficial.

 

None of this, however, has anything to do with what we are on about here. Two cultures. One primitive which believes that young (and often under age in our law) females, preferably not of their own faith, are sexual playthings to be groomed and passed around like a peace pipe. Another, institutional - government agencies too petrified to act because of folk like your good self and your fondness for levelling the 'r' word at people the second a discussion prods your 'white privileged' sensitivities.

As I said in my last post, grooming gangs are a problem

 

The solution isn’t a racist attention seeker with a camera

 

And saying things like Anglo Saxon culture just makes you sound completely out of touch

 

Funny that

As I said in my last post, grooming gangs are a problem

 

The solution isn’t a racist attention seeker with a camera

 

And saying things like Anglo Saxon culture just makes you sound completely out of touch

 

Funny that

 

What's better then, British culture?  White culture?  

 

Not trying to be a nob or owt but what would you call traditional British culture then - or English?  I mean I agree it's old terminology but then folk are happy with black, Asian or whatever else culture as terms.  Does white culture not exist?

 

If not, and I eagerly await a post from NiC, how can white privilege be a real thing then?   

 

If anything 'Anglo Saxon' culture has shown to be the most democratic inclusive and (one of the most) diverse in the world . . .

Edited May 27, 20188 yr by madthatter

 

 

None of this, however, has anything to do with what we are on about here. Two cultures. One primitive which believes that young (and often under age in our law) females, preferably not of their own faith, are sexual playthings to be groomed and passed around like a peace pipe. Another, institutional - government agencies too petrified to act because of folk like your good self and your fondness for levelling the 'r' word at people the second a discussion prods your 'white privileged' sensitivities.

 

Never mind preferably . . . exclusively more like.

 

They'd be shipped off to relatives in Pakistan in boxes if they tried that on

Didn't the Anglo Saxons get twatted by the Normans? 1066 and all that?

Didn't the Anglo Saxons get twatted by the Normans? 1066 and all that?

 

'They' lost a battle (after just winning one half the length of the Isles away) aye.

 

You do love a tenuous stat don't you?    

 

English/British culture is a very mixed bag but I think for the former it isn't that bizarre or owd hat to refer to the traditional culture as Anglo Saxon (that itself is a mix of various tribes).

 

Only the toffs/blue bloods were Norman anyroad (and they were half Viking - who could be considered similar to Anglo Saxons i.e Beowulf  . . . some would even say all of them were Celtic as in the Apaches and Sioux were all Indians)

What's better then, British culture?  White culture?  

 

Not trying to be a nob or owt but what would you call traditional British culture then - or English?  I mean I agree it's old terminology but then folk are happy with black, Asian or whatever else culture as terms.  Does white culture not exist?

 

If not, and I eagerly await a post from NiC, how can white privilege be a real thing then?   

 

If anything 'Anglo Saxon' culture has shown to be the most democratic inclusive and (one of the most) diverse in the world . . .

 

Your first response is spot on.

 

British culture for me is shaped by the various groups that have settled on our fair isle throughout history.

 

Since the Raj and more recently the Windrush generation the national identity has been influenced by things outside of the 'traditional' white way of life.

 

One of the things that i love most about Britain is the way that as long as you're a decent sort the majority of folk will treat you the same be you black/white Gay or straight or whatever combination of things that make you who you are.

 

People like TR seem only interested in causing issues.

 

The number of cases being picked up recently shows how the police and authorities are finally stepping up and taking these scumbags off the streets, these needed doing long ago

Let's hope it continues then frank and then TR and his ilk can hang up their microphones and cameras.

Your first response is spot on.

 

British culture for me is shaped by the various groups that have settled on our fair isle throughout history.

 

Since the Raj and more recently the Windrush generation the national identity has been influenced by things outside of the 'traditional' white way of life.

 

One of the things that i love most about Britain is the way that as long as you're a decent sort the majority of folk will treat you the same be you black/white Gay or straight or whatever combination of things that make you who you are.

 

People like TR seem only interested in causing issues.

 

The number of cases being picked up recently shows how the police and authorities are finally stepping up and taking these scumbags off the streets, these needed doing long ago

 

I agree with that and diversity is a good thing for any society.

 

I think TR is a self-publicist, no doubt, but do believe his heart is in the right place.  Viewing things from his perspective for a second I think it's easier to see his ire and where it comes from

 

fwiw I don't see the value in naming any peoples by their race or ethnic origin but there you go.   If you get rid of any semblance of AS culture though and remove it from the lexicon but keep others, say Indian or Caribbean, then you're only gonna upset a large swathe of folk - that's what I was getting at.

See i want people's differences highlighted and people should be proud of their heritage and culture but not at the detriment of others.

 

The amount of pride in black peoples african roots that has been inspired by Black Panther is fantastic.

 

As a race the white british person doesn't tend to celebrate the positive aspects of our history partly thanks to lefties being too scared to seem racist and partly due to Right wingers using it as a chance to push a 'send the buggers back' type message.

 

I've been enjoying reading about Magid Magid the new Lord Mayor of Sheffield and he speaks a lot of sense.

Bolty, it's time you accept you are massively out of touch

 

This country has moved on and it's clearly left you behind

 

It's up to you whether you think that's a good or bad thing

See i want people's differences highlighted and people should be proud of their heritage and culture but not at the detriment of others.

 

The amount of pride in black peoples african roots that has been inspired by Black Panther is fantastic.

 

As a race the white british person doesn't tend to celebrate the positive aspects of our history partly thanks to lefties being too scared to seem racist and partly due to Right wingers using it as a chance to push a 'send the buggers back' type message.

 

I've been enjoying reading about Magid Magid the new Lord Mayor of Sheffield and he speaks a lot of sense.

 

I think we're on the same page Frank, in the main, but don't see how using the phrase Anglo-Saxon culture when referring to white British girls in a non-white context is to anyone's detriment.  

 

Unless they were Irish?  

I think we're on the same page Frank, in the main, but don't see how using the phrase Anglo-Saxon culture when referring to white British girls in a non-white context is to anyone's detriment.

 

Unless they were Irish?

Most are a bit of both:

 

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.express.co.uk/news/uk/693951/Yorkshire-people-most-British-UK-Anglo-Saxan-DNA/amp

 

But we’re talking about culture right? And described using a period that ended 1,000 years ago. How is that remotely not out of touch

 

It’s also highly irrelevant to the fact TR is a plantpot

'They' lost a battle (after just winning one half the length of the Isles away) aye.

 

You do love a tenuous stat don't you?

 

English/British culture is a very mixed bag but I think for the former it isn't that bizarre or owd hat to refer to the traditional culture as Anglo Saxon (that itself is a mix of various tribes).

 

Only the toffs/blue bloods were Norman anyroad (and they were half Viking - who could be considered similar to Anglo Saxons i.e Beowulf . . . some would even say all of them were Celtic as in the Apaches and Sioux were all Indians)

Tenuous? Think 1066 is pretty definitive if you ask me.

 

And I'm 100% Celt.