It's happening. 

https://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/sport/17405193.bolton-wanderers-close-to-takeover-from-uk-based-consortium/

Thank fuck

5 minutes ago, WestStandUpper said:

Agreed

I know that this was posted on Twitter , I have people I know working in the club , As I said earlier I’m not sure anything has progressed with this , I’m probably being abit tooth and nail with that Naeema Khilj rumour but a few people have told me about that , I’m not trying to steal anyone’s content and sources themselves , my intentions are to update the people on twitter of what is being passed around and what people such as Howard are saying , I do have my own 2 sources , both of which told me about ken getting ready with the liquidators

4 minutes ago, Mantra said:

 

Howard, this sounds bad. Very, very bad. Would you agree?

Are we pretty fucked now, or is there still a chance a takeover can happen?

Sounds like Ken's been stringing parties along to see how much money he can get, realised none of them can give him the money he'd get for liquidating the club and therefore will do that.

Can the court stop this or is it possible that the shares being recalled will save us, if Ken's challenge fails...

Just give it to us straight, if we're dead in the water.

Still time 

1 minute ago, Howardroark said:

Other than 

Basran dropping out as predicted a week earlier

The mystery buyer coming through on the exact day I said they would 

Had you contacted me privately like many have, I would have given you my source of the information, but instead you spew negativity

to be fair howard, I guessed you'd be inundated with pm's

 

And it's hard to be positive as a Bolton fan these days!

Howard,

Does KA’s challenge have any legitimacy??

Has he got a leg to stand on or do you still expect your group to go ahead and take the shares tomorrow? 

@Howardroark have you had dialogue with the party , what are they saying about the current ongoings these past couple of hours same with @Benny The Ball

1 minute ago, TroySwoosh said:

to be fair howard, I guessed you'd be inundated with pm's

 

And it's hard to be positive as a Bolton fan these days!

We will take that as an apology & move on.

Players on a 48 hour strike

Howard, are the shares going to be recalled as it stands currently? 

Are there any issues in the way of this happening? 

Can we not hire the McCanns to make KA disappear 🤬

 

Just now, boltondiver said:

Players on a 48 hour strike

Just in time for the High Court date

1 minute ago, JJ10 said:

Howard,

Does KA’s challenge have any legitimacy??

Has he got a leg to stand on or do you still expect your group to go ahead and take the shares tomorrow? 

Think this is what we all want to know now, if the rest of the information is true and he's lining up liquidators. Surely can't be done by 5pm tomorrow, can it?

2 minutes ago, Wigan White pt2 said:

Can we not hire the McCanns to make KA disappear 🤬

Sickening, that's a fucking shameful post.

3 minutes ago, JJ10 said:

Howard,

Does KA’s challenge have any legitimacy??

Has he got a leg to stand on or do you still expect your group to go ahead and take the shares tomorrow? 

So KA is essentially claiming that the letter stating the 14 day notice was sent to an address that he wasn’t at (probably stadium) and as such should commence from when he received it (Weds last week). 

Its difficult when there’s a sole director and if he can prove he wasn’t at the stadium/address then yes possibly legitimate. Although hopefully the content of this forum and his/Lee’s browsing habits might counter that argument.

What happens tomorrow then do you think @Howardroark think your party will take us over ? 

Just now, Inspector Goole said:

What happens tomorrow then do you think @Howardroark think your party will take us over ? 

I thought you already knew what was going to happen via your research and club sources?

1 minute ago, Howardroark said:

So KA is essentially claiming that the letter stating the 14 day notice was sent to an address that he wasn’t at (probably stadium) and as such should commence from when he received it (Weds last week). 

Its difficult when there’s a sole director and if he can prove he wasn’t at the stadium/address then yes possibly legitimate. Although hopefully the content of this forum and his/Lee’s browsing habits might counter that argument.

Ironically last Wednesday was the day Nixon got hold of Bassini!!! 

Ken/Lee - you’re both cunts.

10 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

Still time 

I genuinely feel sick.

Seems like the only way to avoid this is to give Ken the money that he'd through liquidation.

Or the shares being recalled is valid - despite Ken's challenge.

Ken's pocketed 13 mill from EFL money and transfers, he's asking to be paid off a further 2 million for selling the club. Does his greed know no bounds?

He may have stopped us from going into liquidation 3 years ago, but if he's essentially just delayed it while extracting money from the club, I seriously hope karma absolutely fucks him.

3 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

So KA is essentially claiming that the letter stating the 14 day notice was sent to an address that he wasn’t at (probably stadium) and as such should commence from when he received it (Weds last week). 

Its difficult when there’s a sole director and if he can prove he wasn’t at the stadium/address then yes possibly legitimate. Although hopefully the content of this forum and his/Lee’s browsing habits might counter that argument.

So will this be ruled on by the court on Wednesday if it gets that far? I would hope that he will be seen for what he is by a judge.

19 minutes ago, TroySwoosh said:

so whats howards proof? 

Why don’t you read this thread, check who okayed the validity and ask them. 

5 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

So KA is essentially claiming that the letter stating the 14 day notice was sent to an address that he wasn’t at (probably stadium) and as such should commence from when he received it (Weds last week). 

Its difficult when there’s a sole director and if he can prove he wasn’t at the stadium/address then yes possibly legitimate. Although hopefully the content of this forum and his/Lee’s browsing habits might counter that argument.

Thanks Howard. 

So how do your group know if they’ve got the go ahead to take the shares tomorrow or not ? And what action do they take or not take now? 

How does tomorrow pan out?

My feeling on this latest development is that this definitely isn't getting sorted by Wednesday.

9th April earliest.

3 minutes ago, WestStandUpper said:

Ken/Lee - you’re both cunts.

 

6 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

So KA is essentially claiming that the letter stating the 14 day notice was sent to an address that he wasn’t at (probably stadium) and as such should commence from when he received it (Weds last week). 

Its difficult when there’s a sole director and if he can prove he wasn’t at the stadium/address then yes possibly legitimate. Although hopefully the content of this forum and his/Lee’s browsing habits might counter that argument.

Andersons correspondance address is listed as the stadium on Companies House - Wether he was in residence or not, surely that was the correct address to send it too

he might have sent Lee to the door saying "My dad's not in."

7 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

So KA is essentially claiming that the letter stating the 14 day notice was sent to an address that he wasn’t at (probably stadium) and as such should commence from when he received it (Weds last week). 

Its difficult when there’s a sole director and if he can prove he wasn’t at the stadium/address then yes possibly legitimate. Although hopefully the content of this forum and his/Lee’s browsing habits might counter that argument.

Surely whoever deals with the challenge will show some common sense and realise Ken is being unreasonable.

Can't see the court being allowed to see Ken and Lee's browsing habits as proof, without a warrant of some sort?

Trying not to think too negatively but in all honesty we sound like we're fucked.