Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Rudy

Recommended Posts

Just now, mickbrown said:

So it was you? My mistake. Again

And I said ‘seems to’. I’ve a general general perception (may be misplaced, maybe not) of you as an angry wee fella.
 

You know, stuff like telling people who don’t agree with you to fuck off, and once and one time only, wanting a scrap with someone you encountered on a walk. 

I didn’t want a scrap with him. He was a bellend. My fighting days are behind me. 
 

telling people to fuck off is just a personal choice when I believe  the person is an imbecile. Just personal preference. 
 

im also far from wee which  @Traf and @Casino can verify. So if you believe I’m a wee frail soul you will be sorely disappointed I’m afraid buddy.

Also I wouldn’t say I was angry. More easily combustible. But again I’ve spent many years, many hours in rooms with men with white coats and the like and an awful lot of money has been spent on addressing that side of my personality. It’s still there and rears it’s head from time to time. Again usually with imbeciles but that’s a cross I must bear. 
 

In fact gents please don’t verify that as it Could be quite amusing actually 😊

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Escobarp said:

I didn’t want a scrap with him. He was a bellend. My fighting days are behind me. 
 

telling people to fuck off is just a personal choice when I believe  the person is an imbecile. Just personal preference. 
 

im also far from wee which  @Traf and @Casino can verify. So if you believe I’m a wee frail soul you will be sorely disappointed I’m afraid buddy.

Also I wouldn’t say I was angry. More easily combustible. But again I’ve spent many years, many hours in rooms with men with white coats and the like and an awful lot of money has been spent on addressing that side of my personality. It’s still there and rears it’s head from time to time. Again usually with imbeciles but that’s a cross I must bear. 
 

In fact gents please don’t verify that as it Could be quite amusing actually 😊

Sound like you’re a work in progress.
 

Good luck with that, genuinely. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rudy’s Message said:

Do I need to post two sets of busters on one page? Crikey o’Reilly 

No it’s ok. I made a personal choice not to converse with the buffoon and that’s being reinstated. For my own sake and to stop the page clogging up. 
 

he knows how to reach me if he wants to discuss further with this small frail bloke 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I truly hope Matt Hancock makes his 100,000 target

Nihal (a decent presenter, IMO) told the head of testing that there was not a chance of it being met.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
Just now, boltondiver said:

I truly hope Matt Hancock makes his 100,000 target

Nihal (a decent presenter, IMO) told the head of testing that there was not a chance of it being met.

I don't mind Nihal but he always sounds like he's struggling to think of a question to ask

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Escobarp said:

No it’s ok. I made a personal choice not to converse with the buffoon and that’s being reinstated. For my own sake and to stop the page clogging up. 
 

he knows how to reach me if he wants to discuss further with this small frail bloke 

Nah, you’re alright.

We’ll leave it at that eh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.