6 coppers to take him down or 1 member of the public with his bike? 
 

 

 

15 minutes ago, royal white said:

I listened to his women staying at home stance earlier and he had some good points. What he was saying was it’s shit now that salaries are so low that both parents have to go to work, it would be good if women could stay at home looking after their kids so that they’re not being brought up by strangers. 

Why women?

Think that tells a lot about his mindset

And his fanboys

6 minutes ago, royal white said:

At 4 month old who would you say would be better suited staying at home with them? I’m sorry but anyone saying dad is speaking utter shite. 

Depends who's job pays more or in the US who's job has maternity/paternity leave.

Also who's career is less affected by taking time out to raise the kids

Edited September 11, 2025Sep 11 by frank_spencer

Just now, Casino said:

Why women?

Think that tells a lot about his mindset

And his fanboys

Sorry, ignore me

Its being dealt with

1 minute ago, Casino said:

Why women?

Think that tells a lot about his mindset

And his fanboys

As above 

1 minute ago, frank_spencer said:

Depends who's job pays more or in the US who's job has maternity/paternity leave.

To be fair to RW and we know how literal he is, itd be better if it was mum, imo

However, its not a perfect world

2 minutes ago, Casino said:

To be fair to RW and we know how literal he is, itd be better if it was mum, imo

However, its not a perfect world

And all of a sudden you become a “Charlie fan boy” 🙄 

10 minutes ago, royal white said:

At 4 month old who would you say would be better suited staying at home with them? I’m sorry but anyone saying dad is speaking utter shite. 

You may be right. Probably are right.  My point (as you know) is about his presumption, in line with what it appears were his wider views about women. It should be about the choice between the parents in any particular relationship. No one else’s.

If you’re now rolling your eyes with my “woke” views then guilty as charged.  

Edited September 11, 2025Sep 11 by Bertie

1 minute ago, Casino said:

To be fair to RW and we know how literal he is, itd be better if it was mum, imo

However, its not a perfect world

Ideally yes but there's nothing wrong with a dad/both dads/the other mum raising the kid if life falls that way.

1 minute ago, Bertie said:

You may be right. Probably are right.  My point (as you know) is about his presumption, in line with what it appears were his wider views about women. It should be about the choice between the parents in any particular relationship. No one else’s.

If you’re now rolling your eyes with my “woke” views then guilty as charged.  

Like your man Charlie said, the mothers are heroes, it’s literally a full time job.

4 minutes ago, frank_spencer said:

Ideally yes but there's nothing wrong with a dad/both dads/the other mum raising the kid if life falls that way.

🤦🏻

4 minutes ago, frank_spencer said:

Ideally yes but there's nothing wrong with a dad/both dads/the other mum raising the kid if life falls that way.

Last thing id have wanted

To be fair to RW - can you imagine the poor kid if he was at home with them all day?

In The Night Garden? In the WOKE Garden more like - historically we know Upsy Daisy was white. Here look at this twitter account - prove I'm wrong, go on you weirdo.

1 minute ago, Not in Crawley said:

To be fair to RW - can you imagine the poor kid if he was at home with them all day?

In The Night Garden? In the WOKE Garden more like - historically we know Upsy Daisy was white. Here look at this twitter account - prove I'm wrong, go on you weirdo.

Probably better than being with a pissed up single dad spending his day on ticketmaster 😘

32 minutes ago, royal white said:

I listened to his women staying at home stance earlier and he had some good points. What he was saying was it’s shit now that salaries are so low that both parents have to go to work, it would be good if women could stay at home looking after their kids so that they’re not being brought up by strangers. 

It’s all about choice

Charlie didn’t want a society where women & gay people have freedom & choice.

 He’s an extremist 

5 minutes ago, Casino said:

Last thing id have wanted

I loved being involved with my lad growing up. Disability hitting the missus meant I was doing 90% of the childcare stuff for the first year then again from about 3 when the wife got worse.

Evening lads 😁

I see America is great again.

All hail the trumpster

1 minute ago, London Wanderer said:

It’s all about choice

Charlie didn’t want a society where women & gay people have freedom & choice.

 He’s an extremist 

Maybe about the gays but not about women. 

1 minute ago, frank_spencer said:

I loved being involved with my lad growing up. Disability hitting the missus meant I was doing 90% of the childcare stuff for the first year then again from about 3 when the wife got worse.

That’s a totally different scenario and my old man was in the same boat for about 6 years 

29 minutes ago, royal white said:

At 4 month old who would you say would be better suited staying at home with them? I’m sorry but anyone saying dad is speaking utter shite. 

This is ideology competing with biology. 

Nature has created many different means of raining young, across different living things.

In mamals for example, females are the ones that give birth and produce milk, so it is simply a fundamental of life that early days and weeks the mother is more important. 

That doesn't mean males aren't important, and become more so later on.

Basic stuff.

 

25 minutes ago, royal white said:

Maybe about the gays but not about women. 

He is anti abortion and wants to take the choice away from the woman

These laws are often made and passed by men

It's bullshit

11 minutes ago, Zico said:

He is anti abortion and wants to take the choice away from the woman

These laws are often made and passed by men

It's bullshit

Can’t believe he’s even attempting to argue this one.

It’s blatantly obvious he wanted to take certain freedoms from women. He pretty much admitted it himself. 
 

1 minute ago, London Wanderer said:

Can’t believe he’s even attempting to argue this one.

It’s blatantly obvious he wanted to take certain freedoms from women. He pretty much admitted it himself. 
 

Is this Charlie or Trump you're referring to?

I don't know what the former has said on the matter.

That view is something I don't agree with, and I think it is largely derived from a religious stand point. Perhaps strangely, some women will feel the same religious influences.

Inevitably, that flies in the face of the modern view of women's rights, but they are entitled to hold those views I suppose.

Last thing anyone should be doing is shooting someone for those beliefs though- stand up to them publicly, and through the ballot box if necessary, but not by assassination.

 

Time to post this again 

 

Never heard of either of the Charlie’s. Probably because I’m a boring cunt and my algorithm fills my feed with how to fit wood panelling and acoustic boarding at the moment 

1 hour ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Is this Charlie or Trump you're referring to?

I don't know what the former has said on the matter.

That view is something I don't agree with, and I think it is largely derived from a religious stand point. Perhaps strangely, some women will feel the same religious influences.

Inevitably, that flies in the face of the modern view of women's rights, but they are entitled to hold those views I suppose.

Last thing anyone should be doing is shooting someone for those beliefs though- stand up to them publicly, and through the ballot box if necessary, but not by assassination.

 

 Charlie

 agree on those points 👍