Eddie Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 Just been told from the same source that told me about Cahill for England and Sean Davis signing, that we have put in a bid for Zat Knight. I don't know anything else like how much etc. Good signing if it comes off IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rembrandt Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 "Bolton are set to offer ?3million for Zat Knight." People Sounds unlikely for more than one reason, but who knows. Photo/stadium/scarf/shirt ........ I'll wait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweep Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 He's not a bad player, but he won't be a Cahill. Do I think he's better than A'OB and Shittu, yes, so I would be willing to give him a go. I would be suprised if Villa let him go though, as they already have the job of replacing Laursen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Casino Posted July 6, 2009 Moderators Share Posted July 6, 2009 Which they'll reportedly do with Distin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mounts Kipper Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/wanderers/w...or_Knight_raid/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magic legs Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 He's not a bad player, but he won't be a Cahill. Do I think he's better than A'OB and Shittu, yes, so I would be willing to give him a go. I would be suprised if Villa let him go though, as they already have the job of replacing Laursen. What he said. Villa are after Wheater and Distin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garrp Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 Eddie looks to be ITK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garrp Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 Not his biggest fan, but he is better than what we have(after Cahill) and has plenty of height which is what we are missing. Good signing if it comes off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tylswhite Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 I dont rate him that much but he would improve our starting eleven so ?3 million is a good deal imo. How long before this link get slagged because hes not John Terry? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz Nt Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 I can't believe were after this pile of sh!te!! Why are we not going after JT?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweep Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 Knight is also about the level of player that we can realistically attract as well, I would welcome his signing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uriah rennie Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 dont rate him at all always called him shit. i will be suprised if he plays any good (if we sign him). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Holly_Goodhead Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 I dont rate him that much but he would improve our starting eleven so ?3 million is a good deal imo. How long before this link get slagged because hes not John Terry? Well you started your post by saying you don't rate him.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garrp Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 Well you started your post by saying you don't rate him.... You are an absolute plantpot heres the difference, tyls will still get behind the team, manager and club he's also realistic as to who we can sign you will just slag all and everything off until we end up back in the lower leagues Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Holly_Goodhead Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 What's the difference between a plantpot and an absolute plantpot ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonk Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 What's the difference between a plantpot and an absolute plantpot ? absolute Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THunter Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 What's the difference between a plantpot and an absolute plantpot ?One has vodka in it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whites man Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 Zat Knight song; to the tune of Deep Purple's "Black Knight" Zat Knight, der der de der der der der da der. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Special One Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 Eddie looks to be ITK thats because he's eddie davis who owns the club Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoltonPro15 Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 actions speak louder than words. we were told several weeks ago that mego was going to try and change our style of play to a more attacking/entertaining one. They were the words The actions: we are likley to sign paul robinson and linked again today woth jonathan greening. veloso will not come to use neither will eider. we are yet again interested in a player that is overcoming a serious injury, boddie? I do quite like the signing of s.davis though. I appreciate that we must cut our cloth accordingly, but the likes of zat knight, as someone previously said on this topic, is about the level we are suited to. I for one would like to see us with a bit more ambition in the transfer market I just hope that the wanted list does contain someone that will provide what we were told. i hope that unlike other managers megson is doing a job in the transfer market with a touch of descretion and has an ace or two up his sleeve. i don't wish this to come accross as too negative, but i just long for us to progress and be more competative in transfers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweep Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 I for one would like to see us with a bit more ambition in the transfer market i don't wish this to come accross as too negative, but i just long for us to progress and be more competative in transfers care to give some suggestions then? - were you a bit peeved when you realised we weren't in for Kaka? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garrp Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 actions speak louder than words. we were told several weeks ago that mego was going to try and change our style of play to a more attacking/entertaining one. They were the words The actions: we are likley to sign paul robinson and linked again today woth jonathan greening. veloso will not come to use neither will eider. we are yet again interested in a player that is overcoming a serious injury, boddie? I do quite like the signing of s.davis though. I appreciate that we must cut our cloth accordingly, but the likes of zat knight, as someone previously said on this topic, is about the level we are suited to. I for one would like to see us with a bit more ambition in the transfer market I just hope that the wanted list does contain someone that will provide what we were told. i hope that unlike other managers megson is doing a job in the transfer market with a touch of descretion and has an ace or two up his sleeve. i don't wish this to come accross as too negative, but i just long for us to progress and be more competative in transfers If we were to sign Greening, would that be an indication to you that Megson is trying to change our style of play? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoltonPro15 Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 If we were to sign Greening, would that be an indication to you that Megson is trying to change our style of play? not at all. he isn't good enough for us. and to the previous comment about kaka, i did say that we need to cut our cloth......... i don't have a list of player that i would class as progress. but my point is that i trust that megson does Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 actions speak louder than words. we were told several weeks ago that mego was going to try and change our style of play to a more attacking/entertaining one. They were the words The actions: we are likley to sign paul robinson and linked again today woth jonathan greening. veloso will not come to use neither will eider. we are yet again interested in a player that is overcoming a serious injury, boddie? I do quite like the signing of s.davis though. I appreciate that we must cut our cloth accordingly, but the likes of zat knight, as someone previously said on this topic, is about the level we are suited to. I for one would like to see us with a bit more ambition in the transfer market I just hope that the wanted list does contain someone that will provide what we were told. i hope that unlike other managers megson is doing a job in the transfer market with a touch of descretion and has an ace or two up his sleeve. i don't wish this to come accross as too negative, but i just long for us to progress and be more competative in transfers Do you mean that we should spend more money? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoltonPro15 Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 Do you mean that we should spend more money? NO! I mean that we have been told to expect a different style of play. And to do that we need different players that can perform that role. So far sean davis aside, we are generally being linked with players that are at best average for our club or at worst will only consolidate our maligned style of recent years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts