Worth a punt?

Well, you're clearly not down wit da yoot...

 

It's all about Murder Inc. Records these days (or it was ten years ago).

Well, you're clearly not down wit da yoot...

 

It's all about Murder Inc. Records these days (or it was ten years ago).

Not a clue, last hip hop record I bought was by Boogie Down Productions!

For once I did not think we were disagreeing.

 

 

I disagree.

Traf gets it.

If she was too thrashed to consent its still rape.

Erm no....

 

As this case revolves around the issue of intoxication and consent, it should be noted that it is established in the case of R V Bree that drunken consent to sexual intercourse is nevertheless consent in the eyes of the law. This does not mean that if a person is unconscious through drink or drugs it is acceptable to have sex with that person but rather, where an intoxicated person is functioning and able to make conscious decisions at the time of intercourse and then subsequently regrets that decision and decides to make a complaint of rape, her self-inflicted intoxication ought not to be considered as relevant to the issue of consent.

Erm no....

 

As this case revolves around the issue of intoxication and consent, it should be noted that it is established in the case of R V Bree that drunken consent to sexual intercourse is nevertheless consent in the eyes of the law. This does not mean that if a person is unconscious through drink or drugs it is acceptable to have sex with that person but rather, where an intoxicated person is functioning and able to make conscious decisions at the time of intercourse and then subsequently regrets that decision and decides to make a complaint of rape, her self-inflicted intoxication ought not to be considered as relevant to the issue of consent.

 

 

thats interesting

 

i didnt know that

 

so being pissed and the following day deciding it wasnt a good idea isnt enough to cry rape?

 

thats good

 

suppose theres still the grey area where leathered meets way, way gone

Erm no....

As this case revolves around the issue of intoxication and consent, it should be noted that it is established in the case of R V Bree that drunken consent to sexual intercourse is nevertheless consent in the eyes of the law. This does not mean that if a person is unconscious through drink or drugs it is acceptable to have sex with that person but rather, where an intoxicated person is functioning and able to make conscious decisions at the time of intercourse and then subsequently regrets that decision and decides to make a complaint of rape, her self-inflicted intoxication ought not to be considered as relevant to the issue of consent.

I don't dispute that either. I wasn't suggesting otherwise.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2803640/Ched-Evans-insists-positive-club-community-convicted-rapist-looks-way-football.html#v-3852943860001

If there was a guarantee he would score 20'goals for us this season, would you take him?

If there was a guarantee he would score 20'goals for us this season, would you take him?

Yes

 

Without hesitation

If there was a guarantee he would score 20'goals for us this season, would you take him?

No. Not if you could guarantee and league and cup double.

No.

 

As an aside, from that article, every club has it's mouthbreathers, it seems...

 

 

Has it always been like this, when I started going as an adult, all I noticed was young kids in replica kits, smart-ish lads and blokes aged thirteen to late forties, the odd lad and dad, and old blokes with caps and flasks and Partridge style driving gloves...

 

What's happened?

I realise said mouthbreathers might not be responsible for that banner, btw.

Edited October 26, 201411 yr by Youri McAnespie

Pink hoodie. Man, woman or another?

Steve Evans' mam, that.

Edited October 26, 201411 yr by Youri McAnespie

If there was a guarantee he would score 20'goals for us this season, would you take him?

 

 

Yes

 

Without hesitation

 

Me too.

If there was a guarantee he would score 20'goals for us this season, would you take him?

 

I'd rather get in the player who has the same guarantee minus the rape conviction miself

Steve Evans' mam, that.

Oi............

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oh sorry you mean the manager

If there was a guarantee he would score 20'goals for us this season, would you take him?

 

 

No, it is that mentality that lets so called stars get away with shit because they think they are above the law/better than other people.

 

For people saying yes, how many goals a season if it was a murderer ? a paedo ? 

Not a paedo, because if there was grass on the pitch, they wouldn't play.

No, it is that mentality that lets so called stars get away with shit because they think they are above the law/better than other people.

 

For people saying yes, how many goals a season if it was a murderer ? a paedo ?

Lee Hughes is probably a good bench mark (for the former)

 

Did that Plymouth goalie get himself a new team assuming he's been released?

Back at Plymouth, club captain no less (I think) after playing in The Conference South and League Two for a season each (Truro City and Oxford United respectively) after his release (after serving approximately half of of a seven year stretch.)

Edited October 28, 201411 yr by Youri McAnespie

Lee Hughes is probably a good bench mark (for the former)

 

Did that Plymouth goalie get himself a new team assuming he's been released?

You definately wouldnt be getting a lift home from training with these two.

In an ideal world there wouldn't be a debate about them resuming football careers on release either (McCormick and Hughes) - they'd have both been past-it on their release.

Edited October 28, 201411 yr by Youri McAnespie

Lee Hughes is probably a good bench mark (for the former)

Did that Plymouth goalie get himself a new team assuming he's been released?

Better benchmarks would be someone convicted of murder, both were death by dangerous driving.

Better benchmarks would be someone convicted of murder, both were death by dangerous driving.

Sign Oscar