Todays Games

[little whitt]

5 hours ago, Zico said:

Fuck me he makes me look Tall 

[MickyD]

1 hour ago, little whitt said:

Fuck me he makes me look Tall 

He really doesn’t.

[London Wanderer]

This old firm game is a reminder of how beautiful the game is without VAR.

[radcliffe white]

Everton fans just screech at anything 

[Tonge moor green jacket]

Must be all over at Celtic all ready!

[radcliffe white]

1 minute ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Must be all over at Celtic all ready!

Must be as Facebook gone quiet with all the 2 team wankers

[deane koontz]

That was a red all day. What's the point in VAR

[radcliffe white]

This Patterson lad looks decent 

[gonzo]

VAR had an absolute shocker across the board today.

[Zico]

7 minutes ago, gonzo said:

VAR had an absolute shocker across the board today.

Apparently Newcastle hard done by after the ref reviewed it 

Don't think I've seen a ref stick by their decision after being told to review 

[gonzo]

West Ham a shocker too. Everton should feel aggrieved also.

[Steejay]

2300 Plymouth fans at Derby - great effort 👏

[Tonge moor green jacket]

29 minutes ago, Zico said:

Apparently Newcastle hard done by after the ref reviewed it 

Don't think I've seen a ref stick by their decision after being told to review 

Seen a ref stick with his original decision once, but can't remember who it was nor what game.

[Dr. Feelgood]

1 hour ago, gonzo said:

VAR had an absolute shocker across the board today.

A bad idea, badly implemented & decides multiple matches every week.

Once it goes to VAR the very least they should do is get it fckg right.

If it takes 5 minutes and 20 angles then the original principles of "clear and obvious errors" are not being adhered to. It needs scrapping until they work out how to use it. 

[gonzo]

12 minutes ago, Dr. Feelgood said:

A bad idea, badly implemented & decides multiple matches every week.

Once it goes to VAR the very least they should do is get it fckg right.

If it takes 5 minutes and 20 angles then the original principles of "clear and obvious errors" are not being adhered to. It needs scrapping until they work out how to use it. 

All correct.

It took them 5 minutes to decide about a penalty in the Forest game today. Utterly ridiculous.

We need at least to be hearing what is being said.

[deane koontz]

Feels like they're making a lot more mistakes with var this season than last

[deane koontz]

Is chief wanker Riley still in charge of the wankers

[Zico]

3 hours ago, Zico said:

Apparently Newcastle hard done by after the ref reviewed it 

Don't think I've seen a ref stick by their decision after being told to review 

 

2 hours ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Seen a ref stick with his original decision once, but can't remember who it was nor what game.

Watching motd and the ref did just that with the forest penalty 

[Traf]

VAR horseshit today.

West Ham & Newcastle hard done to. 

[Matt Lofthouse]

Just seen the disallowed West Ham goal. Very harsh, great job by the chelsea keeper getting that chalked off.

[tomski]

VAR is a subjective tool based on another 3 blokes opinions and it’s why it will never work for me.

Goal line is objective and sits with the ref and is instant. Works.

VAR is for the arm chair fans and the tv drama.

[Ani]

19 minutes ago, tomski said:

VAR is a subjective tool based on another 3 blokes opinions and it’s why it will never work for me.

Goal line is objective and sits with the ref and is instant. Works.

VAR is for the arm chair fans and the tv drama.

The principle of VAR is getting more decisions right so it is sound the implementation is terrible.

On a slightly separate note although involving a VAR decision Richarladson ( however it is spelt) was booking for celebrating a goal today by removing his shirt. The goal was disallowed by VAR. Seems harsh but he is a cunt. 

[tomski]

9 minutes ago, Ani said:

The principle of VAR is getting more decisions right so it is sound the implementation is terrible.

On a slightly separate note although involving a VAR decision Richarladson ( however it is spelt) was booking for celebrating a goal today by removing his shirt. The goal was disallowed by VAR. Seems harsh but he is a cunt. 

Have to disagree on the principle as I think it’s effectively having additional refs who clearly have different opinions deeming it a subjective issue and not black or white which is only what technology should be used for.

I do agree if it was executed better they’d be less anger too it. Problem is while it’s different people with different opinions I’m not sure how it improves. 8 of us watching Everton v Liverpool before hand. 4 said onside and 4 offside. Needs to be one blokes decision.

The Richarlison booking standing is complete bollocks once the goal was chalked off.

[Dr. Feelgood]

1 minute ago, tomski said:

The Richarlison booking standing is complete bollocks once the goal was chalked off.

There's a rule saying players shouldn't remove their shirts. A booking is issued to those who do.

He removed his shirt.

So he gets booked.

[tomski]

Just now, Dr. Feelgood said:

There's a rule saying players shouldn't remove their shirts. A booking is issued to those who do.

He removed his shirt.

So he gets booked.

I hear you but he removed his shirt as they’d given a goal. It wouldn’t of happened if they hadn’t given the goal. Once that reversed all after should be expunged similarly to any passage of play after a ‘corrected’ decision would be.