Site Supporter Biggish Dave Posted April 21, 2024 Site Supporter Posted April 21, 2024 Just now, Tonge moor green jacket said: Frustrating as it is, if that had been a winner for utd chalked off, we'd have loved it! 😍 Oh it would have been funny no doubt. I've absolutely nothing against it if it was used for what it was meant to be used for - clear and obvious. If lines need drawing, it isn't clear or obvious Quote
Underpants Posted April 21, 2024 Posted April 21, 2024 What's worst? Losing a FAC semi 5-0. Or losing on pens after coming back from 0-3 and having a last min goal disallowed? This will take some getting over. Quote
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted April 21, 2024 Site Supporter Posted April 21, 2024 Just now, Biggish Dave said: Oh it would have been funny no doubt. I've absolutely nothing against it if it was used for what it was meant to be used for - clear and obvious. If lines need drawing, it isn't clear or obvious See, offside is the one thing I don't mind it for. It's absolute and consistent- unlike many of the other things. Quote
Mounts Kipper Posted April 21, 2024 Posted April 21, 2024 2 minutes ago, Underpants said: What's worst? Losing a FAC semi 5-0. Or losing on pens after coming back from 0-3 and having a last min goal disallowed? This will take some getting over. Losing 5-0. Quote
Whitesince63 Posted April 21, 2024 Posted April 21, 2024 Gutted for them losing by a bloody toe nail off side decision. I suppose you have to accept that if it was off it was off but so unlucky all the same. Quote
Underpants Posted April 21, 2024 Posted April 21, 2024 2 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said: Losing 5-0. 5-0 or Holdsworth skying the ball in the stands? Quote
Traf Posted April 21, 2024 Posted April 21, 2024 5 hours ago, Roger_Dubuis said: Quality finish from Szomdics, that's the standard we hoped Charles was Give over. Another negative swipe at our players. Peterborough paid £1m plus add-ons for Szmodics before selling him to Blackburn at a profit. We paid just over £300k for Charles, nobody was expecting him to be Szmodics-standard. Fuck all wrong with what we got for £300k. Quote
Mounts Kipper Posted April 21, 2024 Posted April 21, 2024 Just now, Underpants said: 5-0 or Holdsworth skying the ball in the stands? 5-0. I’ve still not got over it. Quote
Marc505 Posted April 21, 2024 Posted April 21, 2024 Asbestosis aside, how fucking bad is that view. Quote
Traf Posted April 21, 2024 Posted April 21, 2024 1 minute ago, Marc505 said: Asbestosis aside, how fucking bad is that view. It's terrible, they can see some of the game. Quote
Marc505 Posted April 21, 2024 Posted April 21, 2024 Just now, Traf said: It's terrible, they can see some of the game. Haha fair point Quote
Underpants Posted April 21, 2024 Posted April 21, 2024 3 minutes ago, Mounts Kipper said: 5-0. I’ve still not got over it. Holdsworth for me. The 5-0 I was halfway down Wembley Way just after halftime. Quote
Members Lt. Aldo Raine Posted April 21, 2024 Members Posted April 21, 2024 Leverkusen with another last minute equaliser Quote
gonzo Posted April 21, 2024 Posted April 21, 2024 27 minutes ago, Traf said: Give over. Another negative swipe at our players. Peterborough paid £1m plus add-ons for Szmodics before selling him to Blackburn at a profit. We paid just over £300k for Charles, nobody was expecting him to be Szmodics-standard. Fuck all wrong with what we got for £300k. Ignore the Munich Cunt. Quote
London Wanderer Posted April 21, 2024 Posted April 21, 2024 36 minutes ago, Underpants said: What's worst? Losing a FAC semi 5-0. Or losing on pens after coming back from 0-3 and having a last min goal disallowed? This will take some getting over. The reality has to be worse. Not affiliated to Coventry in the slightest but I'm gutted. Can't imagine going through that as a fan. With the one off the bar in extra time as well. Jammy red bastards. VAR shouldn't exist in situations where one side never plays with it. Quote
Moderators Zico Posted April 21, 2024 Moderators Posted April 21, 2024 4 hours ago, jmjhb said: You could say it's gone a bit Pears-shaped for Blackburn Wonder if Joey Barton will comment on this Quote
mickbrown Posted April 21, 2024 Posted April 21, 2024 I know it’s the correct decision, but VAR is sucking the life out if the game. Quote
onefinfrandsen Posted April 21, 2024 Posted April 21, 2024 43 minutes ago, Underpants said: What's worst? Losing a FAC semi 5-0. Or losing on pens after coming back from 0-3 and having a last min goal disallowed? This will take some getting over. Feel for the lad who scored Coventrys winner, to have that feeling of glory and then have it ripped from your grasp. Quote
Moderators Zico Posted April 21, 2024 Moderators Posted April 21, 2024 4 hours ago, gonzo said: Seen them given First one looked a pen Not sure about the others Quote
Moderators Zico Posted April 21, 2024 Moderators Posted April 21, 2024 1 hour ago, Biggish Dave said: Oh it would have been funny no doubt. I've absolutely nothing against it if it was used for what it was meant to be used for - clear and obvious. If lines need drawing, it isn't clear or obvious See I'm not sure if VAR is the issue or the offside rule is I think it's shite that the rule is that a cm of boot ahead means offside But if that's the rule then VAR has to double check everything because you can't expect the linesman to get it right every time if at all In which case it's not about clear and obvious, it's just about checking everything Which is shite Quote
Traf Posted April 21, 2024 Posted April 21, 2024 Just now, Zico said: See I'm not sure if VAR is the issue or the offside rule is I think it's shite that the rule is that a cm of boot ahead means offside But if that's the rule then VAR has to double check everything because you can't expect the linesman to get it right every time if at all In which case it's not about clear and obvious, it's just about checking everything Which is shite VAR isn't the issue. The offside rule as such isn't the issue here, although that's far from perfect. The problem is how VAR is being used. Clear and obvious errors was the remit. A 50-odd year old bloke with a flag 30yds away from a player can't tell in a split second whether the striker is a toenail offside. Fuck VAR off and use some of the PL's millions to invest in better wages for match officials and make it more accessible/attractive to a younger fitter person to run the line. Quote
Moderators Zico Posted April 21, 2024 Moderators Posted April 21, 2024 5 minutes ago, Traf said: VAR isn't the issue. The offside rule as such isn't the issue here, although that's far from perfect. The problem is how VAR is being used. Clear and obvious errors was the remit. A 50-odd year old bloke with a flag 30yds away from a player can't tell in a split second whether the striker is a toenail offside. Fuck VAR off and use some of the PL's millions to invest in better wages for match officials and make it more accessible/attractive to a younger fitter person to run the line. The refs are full time professionals these days The linesmen today were 35 and 38 Doesn't matter how young or how good their eyesight is, spitting a toenail at full speed from anywhere is near on impossible If as a rule the margin for offside is so tight, then clear and obvious can never be the remit and they are going to have to double check everything if they want the correct decision to be made Quote
waffer cup 07 Posted April 21, 2024 Posted April 21, 2024 Offside rule is an absolute mess. What ever happened to giving the forward benefit of doubt. Quote
gonzo Posted April 21, 2024 Posted April 21, 2024 Automated offsides would have saved Cov going through all that. Our stupid authorities opted out of it while most big leagues took it up. Quote
Site Supporter Cheese Posted April 21, 2024 Site Supporter Posted April 21, 2024 20 minutes ago, Zico said: See I'm not sure if VAR is the issue or the offside rule is I think it's shite that the rule is that a cm of boot ahead means offside But if that's the rule then VAR has to double check everything because you can't expect the linesman to get it right every time if at all In which case it's not about clear and obvious, it's just about checking everything Which is shite I'm sure people used to talk about there having to be 'daylight' between the defender and attacker in order for it to be deemed offside. Maybe the rule changed at some point, but it's more likely I was misunderstanding it. I didn't even know about the "goalkeeper+defender" OR "2 defenders" part of it until an incident last year when a defender was clearly playing someone onside, but the goalkeeper was miles out of his box, so it was disallowed anyway. Can't remember what match it was. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.