What is that "mate" of mine Sadiq Khan trying to achieve ?

 

You lost you demented little cretin, get over it and concentrate on your job you terrorist sympathiser.

1 hour ago, BobyBrno said:

Apart from Kent, no one has challenged any of my points apart from the usual personal digs. Maybe I’m right?😉

Sorry you irrational, myopic, obsessive, paranoid, stubborn, arrogant, confused, ageist old fool! 😉😁

17 minutes ago, kent_white said:

Sorry you irrational, myopic, obsessive, paranoid, stubborn, arrogant, confused, ageist old fool! 😉😁

😊 Always happy to admit a mistake.👍

As for the name calling (not you)

I think I may have rattled a few. Peace and love.😉

‘Name-calling during an argument is often a sign of losing the argument because it's an attempt to derail the discussion by attacking the person rather than addressing the issue. It indicates a lack of rational arguments and resorts to emotional appeals or insults’

1 minute ago, BobyBrno said:

😊 Always happy to admit a mistake.👍

As for the name calling (not you)

I think I may have rattled a few. Peace and love.😉

‘Name-calling during an argument is often a sign of losing the argument because it's an attempt to derail the discussion by attacking the person rather than addressing the issue. It indicates a lack of rational arguments and resorts to emotional appeals or insults’

So even though these folk that were polled got what they wanted, they still haven’t got what they wanted.

Thats some Bolty-esque doublethink going on there.

Maybe these polls are total bollocks.

8 minutes ago, Spider said:

So even though these folk that were polled got what they wanted, they still haven’t got what they wanted.

Thats some Bolty-esque doublethink going on there.

Maybe these polls are total bollocks.

I’ve seriously no idea what your talking about. Which poll? I only wanted to show the Chancellor one but the other was attached.

44 minutes ago, BobyBrno said:

I’ve seriously no idea what your talking about. Which poll? I only wanted to show the Chancellor one but the other was attached.

You showed it, not me. It follows that you posted it for a reason.

If it was a bit of a faux pas, it was indeed unfortunate in terms of attempting to use a poll to prove a point.

Edited June 10, 20251 yr by Spider

5 minutes ago, Spider said:

You showed it, not me. It follows that you posted it for a reason.

If it was a bit of a faux pas, it was indeed unfortunate in terms of attempting to use a poll to prove a point.

I posted it and it got the reaction I expected. You really don’t think  I thought that you and others were going to say ‘ yeh you’re right there Boby’ 😊

Each reply is welcome. 👍

 

21 minutes ago, BobyBrno said:

I posted it and it got the reaction I expected. You really don’t think  I thought that you and others were going to say ‘ yeh you’re right there Boby’ 😊

Each reply is welcome. 👍

 

Ah

fishing.

of course.

😉

22 minutes ago, BobyBrno said:

I posted it and it got the reaction I expected. You really don’t think  I thought that you and others were going to say ‘ yeh you’re right there Boby’ 😊

Each reply is welcome. 👍

 

You’ve moved on from popularity contests at least.

Youll be upsetting George Clooney next, then the trifecta will have landed.

6 minutes ago, Spider said:

Ah

fishing.

of course.

😉

Fishing? Me? Nah. 
Anyway, when will these be tried?

57 minutes ago, BobyBrno said:

Fishing? Me? Nah. 
Anyway, when will these be tried?

Im sure you’ve got a graph 🥹

5 minutes ago, Spider said:

Im sure you’ve got a graph 🥹

Very happy to be associated with Graphs. 👍

2 hours ago, BobyBrno said:

Fishing? Me? Nah. 
Anyway, when will these be tried?

Scheduled for 30th June 

6 hours ago, BobyBrno said:

Irrational 

myopic

old fool 

obsessed

stubborn

paranoid

confused

arrogance

ageism

All in less than an hour. Is that it?

Has anyone called you gammon yet?

6 hours ago, BobyBrno said:

😊 Always happy to admit a mistake.👍

As for the name calling (not you)

I think I may have rattled a few. Peace and love.😉

‘Name-calling during an argument is often a sign of losing the argument because it's an attempt to derail the discussion by attacking the person rather than addressing the issue. It indicates a lack of rational arguments and resorts to emotional appeals or insults’

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/16t1FsRVea/

Just for you 😘 

8 hours ago, BobyBrno said:

I’ve seriously no idea what your talking about. Which poll? I only wanted to show the Chancellor one but the other was attached.

Why you engage with such an imbecile is beyond me.

 

9 hours ago, Zico said:

Has anyone called you gammon yet?

Unfortunately not. Thought I’d get it to 10. I like round numbers.🤷‍♂️

14 minutes ago, BobyBrno said:

Unfortunately not. Thought I’d get it to 10. I like round numbers.🤷‍♂️

If you show contempt towards boat people in hotels, that should do it

Just now, Zico said:

If you show contempt towards boat people in hotels, that should do it

I thought Sam was better than Southgate. Best I can do.😊

4 hours ago, bolty58 said:

Why you engage with such an imbecile is beyond me.

 

I think I may have rattled a few. Peace and love.😉

‘Name-calling during an argument is often a sign of losing the argument because it's an attempt to derail the discussion by attacking the person rather than addressing the issue. It indicates a lack of rational arguments and resorts to emotional appeals or insults’

28 minutes ago, Spider said:

 

I think I may have rattled a few. Peace and love.😉

‘Name-calling during an argument is often a sign of losing the argument because it's an attempt to derail the discussion by attacking the person rather than addressing the issue. It indicates a lack of rational arguments and resorts to emotional appeals or insults’

Plagiarist! Whoops. Sorry.

(Ms Reeves approves - obsessed)

 

1 hour ago, BobyBrno said:

I thought Sam was better than Southgate. Best I can do.😊

You're on the right track if you start on Southgate 

Labour just getting things done.

 

 

19 hours ago, BobyBrno said:

Not sure what you call obsessing but discussing politics on a politics thread isn’t what I would call it. Bit over your head all this?

That's not a personal dig?

46 minutes ago, royal white said:

Labour just getting things done.

 

 

Whereas his mob were brilliant at meeting targets.

As long as it moving the right way, they are improving on what his shower of shit delivered for 14 years.

These headlines are beginning to sound like a wanderers match report. “Miss target”