What is that "mate" of mine Sadiq Khan trying to achieve ?

 

You lost you demented little cretin, get over it and concentrate on your job you terrorist sympathiser.

2 minutes ago, Spider said:

He needs to reverse the decision.

If he does, happy days. If not, it’s his first real fuck up.

It’s more his speech in commons a couple of years ago where he criticised Egypt for jailing someone for a tweet. Meanwhile over here we are jailing folk for tweets. 

2 hours ago, royal white said:

Yep as mentioned above.

 

Reform And Rupert Lowes lot are lapping this up at the minute. 

You've only mentioned Ian Duncan Smith 

Just now, DirtySanchez said:

You've only mentioned Ian Duncan Smith 

There’s more in the news that you’ve said you’ve read? 

5 minutes ago, royal white said:

It’s more his speech in commons a couple of years ago where he criticised Egypt for jailing someone for a tweet. Meanwhile over here we are jailing folk for tweets. 

She was jailed for breaking the law

Just now, Spider said:

She was jailed for breaking the law

So was you man in T gypt. 

3 minutes ago, royal white said:

There’s more in the news that you’ve said you’ve read? 

You said you've mentioned others who have condemned it and only used IDS as proof 

I said I haven't seen any others simply because I haven't seen them in the news and asked you to say who they were 

So far we haven't moved on from IDS in your list of Tory members (plural) who make your list 

So who are they? 

2 minutes ago, DirtySanchez said:

You said you've mentioned others who have condemned it and only used IDS as proof 

I said I haven't seen any others simply because I haven't seen them in the news and asked you to say who they were 

So far we haven't moved on from IDS in your list of Tory members (plural) who make your list 

So who are they? 

Alicia kearns, it’s in the news you haven’t seen. 

Getting beyond a joke now. What Starmer does in response will be rather interesting 

 

24 minutes ago, miamiwhite said:

Getting beyond a joke now. What Starmer does in response will be rather interesting 

 

Starmer shouldn't have to do anything 

People affiliated with a terrorist organisation have been arrested and face trial 

As it should be

If they choose not to eat that's on them 

2 hours ago, royal white said:

Alicia kearns, it’s in the news you haven’t seen. 

So we're up to Aliclia Kearns (had to google who she is) and IDS is the best you can come up with 

And it took you most of the afternoon to trawl X to try and find them despite you making the claim much earlier 

No mark folk

Better if Sunak, Truss, Jenrick apologises wouldn't you say? 

1 hour ago, Zico said:

 

If they choose not to eat that's on them 

OMAD. 

27 minutes ago, DirtySanchez said:

So we're up to Aliclia Kearns (had to google who she is) and IDS is the best you can come up with 

And it took you most of the afternoon to trawl X to try and find them despite you making the claim much earlier 

No mark folk

Better if Sunak, Truss, Jenrick apologises wouldn't you say? 

All afternoon 😂😂 it was in the Guardian (I suppose you don’t do that either) this morning. As for no marks you’re probably best off reading up. Also both of these signed for his release, I’m not sure if the others did.

Whataboutery is off the scale today fella

 

1 hour ago, gonzo said:

OMAD. 

OMAW 

OMAM

smiley 

1 hour ago, royal white said:

All afternoon 😂😂 it was in the Guardian (I suppose you don’t do that either) this morning. As for no marks you’re probably best off reading up. Also both of these signed for his release, I’m not sure if the others did.

Whataboutery is off the scale today fella

 

There is no whataboutery

I haven't moved away from the argument 

I just asked about what Tories were saying about the same bloke that they wanted release when they were in power 

You mentioned two and let's face it IDS is a nobody these days and ive no clue who the other is 

You clearly do though 

I've been working today so let's keep it simple for you 

Which Tory MPs which are now apologising for his release 

We've got IDS and a no mark 

I've still got work to do but im happy to bow down to the font of all knowledge on this 

And your mate on X doesn't count as a source 

No whataboutery, just tell me 

 

35 minutes ago, DirtySanchez said:

There is no whataboutery

I haven't moved away from the argument 

I just asked about what Tories were saying about the same bloke that they wanted release when they were in power 

You mentioned two and let's face it IDS is a nobody these days and ive no clue who the other is 

You clearly do though 

I've been working today so let's keep it simple for you 

Which Tory MPs which are now apologising for his release 

We've got IDS and a no mark 

I've still got work to do but im happy to bow down to the font of all knowledge on this 

And your mate on X doesn't count as a source 

No whataboutery, just tell me 

 

Tory MPs are pushing for him to be have his citizenships revoked and returned to Egypt. 
 

The PM and his right hand man are both celebrating that he’s been released and he’s in the UK. If you can’t see where the problem is then there’s no helping you. 

Oh look! Another u turn 😂😂 sounds like the police and white folk are fair game though. 

 

All good.

Well done Mr Starmer.

Judge folk on their end results etc..

2 hours ago, royal white said:

Tory MPs are pushing for him to be have his citizenships revoked and returned to Egypt. 
 

The PM and his right hand man are both celebrating that he’s been released and he’s in the UK. If you can’t see where the problem is then there’s no helping you. 

The same Tory MPs who pushed his citizenship through and were campaigning for his release and would have welcomed it had it happened on their watch 

If you can't see the complete hypocrisy then there is no helping you 

On 29/12/2025 at 08:21, kent_white said:

Hang on. I thought you were alright with people calling for other people to be killed on social media. 

There was certainly an outcry when that woman got jailed for advocating burning migrant hotels down. 

Can't remember your take on it at the time though to be fair. Maybe I've got that wrong?

Yes. You have.

In similar vein to the angle you've tried to use there, good old BBC News.

The left wing biased hypocrites this morning poured cold water on what this imminent export said. It was 10 years ago when he was a 'young man' apparently and this should excuse it to some degree.

Yet they have not only actively and miraculously unearthed politically opposed 'former schoolmates' of Nigel Farage and pushed unsubstantiated claims of overt racism from them but the 50 years which have elapsed are apparently of no import. 50.

The entire BBC News department wants purging a.s.a.p.

13 hours ago, mickbrown said:

Soz. Didn't see that. 
 

Have they? Sunak, Truss, Cleverley, Patel?

All I’ve seen is that uber prick Philps, giving it the big un. 

I thought Jess's surname was spelled 'Phillips'?

6 hours ago, DirtySanchez said:

The same Tory MPs who pushed his citizenship through and were campaigning for his release and would have welcomed it had it happened on their watch 

If you can't see the complete hypocrisy then there is no helping you 

Probably…might have….could have…..chance of…..If…..😂 I don’t need the help cocker, I’m just commenting on what has happened. 
 

And I think you’re missing the point of my original post, but that’s expected. 

4 hours ago, bolty58 said:

Yes. You have.

In similar vein to the angle you've tried to use there, good old BBC News.

The left wing biased hypocrites this morning poured cold water on what this imminent export said. It was 10 years ago when he was a 'young man' apparently and this should excuse it to some degree.

Yet they have not only actively and miraculously unearthed politically opposed 'former schoolmates' of Nigel Farage and pushed unsubstantiated claims of overt racism from them but the 50 years which have elapsed are apparently of no import. 50.

The entire BBC News department wants purging a.s.a.p.

So you’re saying there’s a time limit. Fair enough.

50 years is long enough to dismiss what someone said.

wheres the line? 50 weeks? 50 months? There must be one because you’re saying so here.

 

6 hours ago, bolty58 said:

Yes. You have.

In similar vein to the angle you've tried to use there, good old BBC News.

The left wing biased hypocrites this morning poured cold water on what this imminent export said. It was 10 years ago when he was a 'young man' apparently and this should excuse it to some degree.

Yet they have not only actively and miraculously unearthed politically opposed 'former schoolmates' of Nigel Farage and pushed unsubstantiated claims of overt racism from them but the 50 years which have elapsed are apparently of no import. 50.

The entire BBC News department wants purging a.s.a.p.

Apart from the fact that the story wasn't unearthed by BBC News and has been substantiated by several classmates over the years he attended Dulwich College, which is hardly a hotbed of lefty indoctrination.

Still, facts aren't needed for a good old BBC rant, Nigel would be proud. 😁

4 minutes ago, Winchester White said:

Apart from the fact that the story wasn't unearthed by BBC News and has been substantiated by several classmates over the years he attended Dulwich College, which is hardly a hotbed of lefty indoctrination.

Still, facts aren't needed for a good old BBC rant, Nigel would be proud. 😁

👍

Psst. Farage is an anti-Semitic, pro-Russian racist and grifter. Pass it on.

8 hours ago, bolty58 said:

Yes. You have.

In similar vein to the angle you've tried to use there, good old BBC News.

The left wing biased hypocrites this morning poured cold water on what this imminent export said. It was 10 years ago when he was a 'young man' apparently and this should excuse it to some degree.

Yet they have not only actively and miraculously unearthed politically opposed 'former schoolmates' of Nigel Farage and pushed unsubstantiated claims of overt racism from them but the 50 years which have elapsed are apparently of no import. 50.

The entire BBC News department wants purging a.s.a.p.

Well I suppose one of the reasons might be that our potential (and in some cases widely predicted) next prime minister is going to come up for a while lot more detailed and sustained scrutiny than someone who is in the news momentarily. 

I've no idea why you think my original comment was anything like what you are describing from the BBC? I've not talked about excusing anyone. 

I'm just asking you whether you think it's right or wrong that people can be jailed for tweets/social media posts that are actively calling for violence against other people. 

I think it is. What do you think?