What is that "mate" of mine Sadiq Khan trying to achieve ?

 

You lost you demented little cretin, get over it and concentrate on your job you terrorist sympathiser.

2 minutes ago, Cheese said:

No need to wait. You've got my phone number. Carry on "not supporting Farage" by jumping to his defence at every opportunity, even when it involves his past of being a well-known racist and antisemite.

“A well Known racist and antisemite” so well known that you have to go back 40-50 years for some alleged name calling in a school yard. 😂

I do not have your phone number and I don't want it, this was the first time I have ever spoken ab out Farage because 5 of the soft cunts he name called were interviewed on the news, and I don't care about his past one little bit

3 minutes ago, athywhite1958 said:

I do not have your phone number and I don't want it, this was the first time I have ever spoken ab out Farage because 5 of the soft cunts he name called were interviewed on the news, and I don't care about his past one little bit

Why are you posting about it then, and saying people who actually went to school with him are liars?

Edited December 17, 2025Dec 17 by Cheese

There’s folk on Twitter who want Starmer put in the tower because he didn’t shag Ukranian rent boys

1 hour ago, royal white said:

I was pissing up down there long before you knew the place existed you buffoon.

Bless

1 hour ago, athywhite1958 said:

It was schoolkids name calling

Racists will be racists

There you go again, where did I call them liars? You just can't help yourself can you, I  called them wet wipes and soft twats and snivelling  cunts. All they said may well be true but it was in the playground, so go and fantasise about somebody else saying something you don't like. 

13 hours ago, mickbrown said:

So he’s only going to tell us how he’s going to do that once he’s in power? Aye, that’ll work😀

He's already told you. It will be the usual Downing Street setting reconfirmation.

13 hours ago, Sweep said:

Do you really think that would happen? - I know you like a wind up, but even you know that's not going to happen. 

How very dare you!? Me? Wind up?

Perish the thought.

11 hours ago, Ani said:

Tbf the Tories had ‘stop the boats’ Labour ‘smash the gangs’ and neither had or have a proper strategy to change anything. 
 

Labour had 14 years to get ready and it all has proven too much it seems. Slipping from one mistake to the next. 
 

I massively disagree with 99% of what Reform stand for but if they appeal to enough people they will get in. They just have so few people of any quality or experience to make up a Govt. 

Hopefully The Conservative Reform Party will fix this bit.

10 hours ago, miamiwhite said:

https://www.politicshome.com/news/article/unison-general-secretary-andrea-egan-christina-mcanea

Bolton's very own Andrea Egan. This will be fun as her and Starmer have serious history

He's fucking toast for certain now. The sinister lot will be scheming to grab power. The country will be even more fucked when that happens.

10 hours ago, Duck Egg said:

1992 is not fairly recently! 

No different to me buying something from eg M&S or Timpsons and them using their profits to donate to the Tories.

What dog shit.

10 hours ago, Sweep said:

or what ChatGPT spews out for him 😉

 'Unions are as democratic as it gets'. We knew he was a fucking tool but this is beyond the pale.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn5z54236wgo

https://www.spectator.com.au/2025/07/ex-unite-boss-under-fire-over-private-jets-and-million-pound-hotel-project/

https://observer.co.uk/news/national/article/unite-union-broke-law-in-hotel-project-scandal-that-left-66m-hole-in-accounts

Keep paying your union dues and wait until a real commie takes the reins and then vote Labour. You know it makes sense.

7 hours ago, Sweep said:

Balls to that, just watercannon the lot of them, and then wade in with the cattle prods, the scruffy fuckers

There is the odd occasion that I think of you as other than an adversary. 

3 hours ago, Not in Crawley said:

Racists will be rapists.

 

 

2 hours ago, athywhite1958 said:

I'm not defending him, I am simply asking why these wet  wipes didn't come forward before if they were that offended

Simply because they are being prompted (and possibly funded) by those desperately seeking a way to shore up their red wall. Like the despicable Dems in the US, they will stoop to any level. Hopefully their efforts produce a similar result.

 

36 minutes ago, bolty58 said:

 

Patrick Cristys. 😂😂

Managed about 5 seconds of that.

The most talentless journalist in the UK.

1 hour ago, bolty58 said:

He's already told you. It will be the usual Downing Street setting reconfirmation.

Aye. Course he has

3 hours ago, Bertie said:

Patrick Cristys. 😂😂

Managed about 5 seconds of that.

The most talentless journalist in the UK.

You can't handle the truth.

6 hours ago, bolty58 said:

You can't handle the truth.

😂😂😂.

You're on top form today!

Truth? GBN don’t know the meaning of word.

Remind me who’s bankrolling their debt to pump out divisive, populist lies?

So now GB News are top of the news channel ratings , does that make them mainstream media?

Who nobody should trust, from what the far right tell us?

 

Edited December 18, 2025Dec 18 by Spider

12 hours ago, Bertie said:

😂😂😂.

You're on top form today!

Truth? GBN don’t know the meaning of word.

Remind me who’s bankrolling their debt to pump out divisive, populist lies?

Remind me who gives a fuck about who's bankrolling them?

Like football, just lift the trophy and let the fucking losers howl about how you got your hands on the trophy.

Edited December 18, 2025Dec 18 by bolty58

https://www.ft.com/content/63ed1262-6cb0-46db-843a-de78bf0aeab6
 

Some scary figures about Motability scheme, who’s CEO will get £900k this year. Not bad for running a monopoly business that should be part of government. 

 

22 hours ago, Bertie said:

😂😂😂.

You're on top form today!

Truth? GBN don’t know the meaning of word.

Remind me who’s bankrolling their debt to pump out divisive, populist lies?

You mean things you don't agree with?

Like proper revelations over migration figures and grooming gangs?

Factual numbers that others have been reluctant to release, or details of criminality etc.

Charlie Peters has blown thellid on grooming gangs, leading to greater public exposure, and quite possibly being instrumental in forcing the government to have a full public inquiry (if they do actually get on with it).

Of course they push agendas that they want to; over net zero for example, but that is the preserve of a privately owned media company.

Not the preserve of a national broadcaster.

You are allowed to have a different view on things too.

As for funding and debt, we've been here before, quite recently in fact.

Re-visit it, just for a fuller picture.

You have a take on it, which is applicable to any privately owned media company, but fail to make the same accusations towards them. Why is that?