Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Sweaty Ken


Lostock Whites

Recommended Posts

  • Moderators
Just now, Duck Egg said:

What's he ever done wrong to you? Or us?

I get folk aren't comfortable with some sort of 'love in' that's going on but as far as I can see FGR and their chairman haven't done owt wrong.

He's oft been described as controversial

Yeovil, yeah I know, reckon he's dodgy and ffp is soon to catch up with them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Traf said:

I reckon the crowd will get behind the team v WBA

Let's hope so. This furore will do boost numbers if nowt else. People will want to come and see the spectacle for themselves and this time I don't mean Will Buckley 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Boothy said:

See this is just the sensationalist drivel that people are spitting out every other post. Go and have a read up on contract law and the validity of verbal agreements and in the mean time let’s hope none of the gung ho Twatterati latch on to your useless comment and whip each other up into a frenzy.

And I’d suggest you explain how many people successfully win a case when they claim a verbal agreement has superseded a written one when the other party denies such verbal agreements.

Good luck with that.

Also why were FGR paying his wages? And Norwich paying their two? Clearly not what was agreed. 

Its clear Ken is talking a load of nonsense. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Site Supporter
16 minutes ago, bwfcfan5 said:

And I’d suggest you explain how many people successfully win a case when they claim a verbal agreement has superseded a written one when the other party denies such verbal agreements.

Good luck with that.

Also why were FGR paying his wages? And Norwich paying their two? Clearly not what was agreed. 

Its clear Ken is talking a load of nonsense. 

 

Eh the parent club always pays the wages don't they? That's who the players contract is with?

The loan is between the two clubs, so it's up to the said parent to claim a percentage back.

Either I'm talking nonsense or you are.

Edited by HomerJay
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, bwfcfan5 said:

And I’d suggest you explain how many people successfully win a case when they claim a verbal agreement has superseded a written one when the other party denies such verbal agreements.

Good luck with that.

Also why were FGR paying his wages? And Norwich paying their two? Clearly not what was agreed. 

Its clear Ken is talking a load of nonsense. 

 

Why are they paying the wages if that was not what was agreed ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Diversion tactics by Ken.  Everyone hates Ken according to Ken. He's right and everyone else is wrong. He's our Trump. This FGR thing is a major headache for him and his supporters. The subjects are getting very restless now. Will King Ken abdicate? 

 

Our great club is an absolute shambles.

 

OINO.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Site Supporter
16 minutes ago, Duck Egg said:

What's he ever done wrong to you? Or us?

I get folk aren't comfortable with some sort of 'love in' that's going on but as far as I can see FGR and their chairman haven't done owt wrong.

Who took this story to the media? Why?

Is that not dragging the club through the mud?

We are an easy target and it's starting to snowball out of control.

I'm sure some folk just want bwfc to fold so they can say I told you so.

I'm glad my 8 year doesn't understand any of this. It's fucking embarrassing.

Edited by HomerJay
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
51 minutes ago, Casino said:

I read it that KA s position is that the first instalment was agreed to be paid after we get the EFL payment

Vince wants it now

Vince wants the 3rd instalment bringing forward to be paid with the second one in August....ish

Given Vince was relaxed about it all last week and given what has happened today, I don't think it's because they've fallen out over what week in January the first payment is made

Regards wanting to bring a payment forward, if that wasn't agreed verbally or legally then I don't think they'd be talking about legal action

I've not seen Vince's full interview but given he's the one talking about legal action I doubt hes the one trying to not stick to what was agreed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So only once have players salaries been paid late. The staff have never been paid late. The argument with FG chairman is one words against the others (yet we have weirdo fans now wanting to watch FG) there’s a possibility all 3 players could still be coming back, hes looking for a buyer and there’s offers on in the club shop....what else do people want?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

Vince said the following...ish

Anderson said on Wednesday he would pay on Thursday

He didn't

I recalled Doidge, Anderson is a cnut

 

Now, one question

Why would Anderson have said he would pay the next day...does it not seem odd

Next week, next month, but next day

What's the point

Why not have the fcuk you, you're getting nowt conversation at that stage

I don't know or claim to know but that seemed strange

 

Edited by Casino
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.