Sweep Posted June 24, 2025 Posted June 24, 2025 13 hours ago, bolty58 said: Beats me but I have had plenty of strange looks just opting for the bacon and eggs with some toast. and a gravy boat full of luke warm maple syrup to liberally pour over the top of course Quote
Lt. Aldo Raine Posted June 24, 2025 Posted June 24, 2025 Well, if nothing else it's good to know we've committed to spending 5% of GDP on defence Quote
bolty58 Posted June 24, 2025 Posted June 24, 2025 9 hours ago, Sweep said: and a gravy boat full of luke warm maple syrup to liberally pour over the top of course No. A Mackeson. Quote
Tonge moor green jacket Posted June 25, 2025 Posted June 25, 2025 11 hours ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said: Well, if nothing else it's good to know we've committed to spending 5% of GDP on defence What a load of absolute gloop that is. Spending to include projects that aren't military related, and not until 2035. Starmer won't be around to see it through, and whichever government comes next will have massive decisions to make to achieve it. Huge cuts elsewhere, tax rises, virtually impossible growth- apart from the latter, any such actions will be met with derision by the opposition (likely to be Labour). And the merry-go-round continues. Quote
London Wanderer Posted June 25, 2025 Posted June 25, 2025 Doesn’t look like they set Iran’s nuclear capacity back as much as they’ve been boasting about. Depending on who you believe. Quote
Casino Posted June 25, 2025 Posted June 25, 2025 12 hours ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: What a load of absolute gloop that is. Spending to include projects that aren't military related, and not until 2035. Starmer won't be around to see it through, and whichever government comes next will have massive decisions to make to achieve it. Huge cuts elsewhere, tax rises, virtually impossible growth- apart from the latter, any such actions will be met with derision by the opposition (likely to be Labour). And the merry-go-round continues. Long way back from 14 years of fucking about and brexshit Quote
gonzo Posted June 25, 2025 Posted June 25, 2025 1 hour ago, London Wanderer said: Doesn’t look like they set Iran’s nuclear capacity back as much as they’ve been boasting about. Depending on who you believe. If it becomes prominent once more they'll just twat em again. Quote
Not in Crawley Posted June 25, 2025 Posted June 25, 2025 4 minutes ago, gonzo said: If it becomes prominent once more they'll just twat em again. Who's they? This isn't a binary discussion, despite what comes out of Trumps mouth at whatever moment of the day, but this is storing up more problems. Quote
kent_white Posted June 25, 2025 Posted June 25, 2025 It would help a lot more in these kind of situations if Donald, his team and his press secretary didn't sound like North Korean news anchors whenever they made a statement. It's mega cringe. Quote
London Wanderer Posted June 25, 2025 Posted June 25, 2025 11 minutes ago, gonzo said: If it becomes prominent once more they'll just twat em again. I don’t think they did twat them is the point Quote
Spider Posted June 25, 2025 Posted June 25, 2025 (edited) I think the European and NATO leaders have decided to just appease trump and hope the next 3 years pass relatively drama free. Caveat - he’s done ok here. Edited June 25, 2025 by Spider Quote
gonzo Posted June 25, 2025 Posted June 25, 2025 29 minutes ago, London Wanderer said: I don’t think they did twat them is the point They clearly did. It wasn't Trump flying the plane. It was an operation by the most advanced special forces on the planet with intelligence and weaponry like no other. And if there's still some nuclear tackle there in the future they'll just do it again. Quote
gonzo Posted June 25, 2025 Posted June 25, 2025 37 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said: Who's they? This isn't a binary discussion, despite what comes out of Trumps mouth at whatever moment of the day, but this is storing up more problems. Fuck are you talking about? The US bombed Irans Nuclear sites. If they have a pop at developing them again they'll do it again. Is that binary enough? Quote
London Wanderer Posted June 25, 2025 Posted June 25, 2025 4 minutes ago, gonzo said: They clearly did. It wasn't Trump flying the plane. It was an operation by the most advanced special forces on the planet with intelligence and weaponry like no other. And if there's still some nuclear tackle there in the future they'll just do it again. The leaked US intelligence report suggests they had limited impact. Only set them back a few months. That'll be those special forces heading in every few months then 😄 Quote
royal white Posted June 25, 2025 Posted June 25, 2025 2 hours ago, London Wanderer said: Doesn’t look like they set Iran’s nuclear capacity back as much as they’ve been boasting about. Depending on who you believe. I’ll believe the reports saying they have done a lot of damage Quote
Not in Crawley Posted June 25, 2025 Posted June 25, 2025 9 minutes ago, gonzo said: Fuck are you talking about? The US bombed Irans Nuclear sites. If they have a pop at developing them again they'll do it again. Is that binary enough? Yes it is binary. Why now? Do you really think this is going to help in the long run? Because I'm damn sure it won't and we're just pushing another issue into an much larger one. I thought you were brighter then this. Quote
London Wanderer Posted June 25, 2025 Posted June 25, 2025 2 minutes ago, royal white said: I’ll believe the reports saying they have done a lot of damage I'm sure they did cause a lot of damage. Define what a lot of damage means in reality though? Still doesn't mean they've set them back that much, or that Iran can't fix it. https://edition.cnn.com/2025/06/24/politics/intel-assessment-us-strikes-iran-nuclear-sites "The assessment, which has not been previously reported, was produced by the Defence Intelligence Agency, the Pentagon’s intelligence arm" Seems a pretty reliable source no? Quote
London Wanderer Posted June 25, 2025 Posted June 25, 2025 7 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said: I thought you were brighter then this. Stop it 😂 Quote
royal white Posted June 25, 2025 Posted June 25, 2025 Just now, London Wanderer said: I'm sure they did cause a lot of damage. Define what a lot of damage means in reality though? Still doesn't mean they've set them back that much, or that Iran can't fix it. https://edition.cnn.com/2025/06/24/politics/intel-assessment-us-strikes-iran-nuclear-sites "The assessment, which has not been previously reported, was produced by the Defence Intelligence Agency, the Pentagon’s intelligence arm" Seems a pretty reliable source no? Id say this is as reliable. Quote
London Wanderer Posted June 25, 2025 Posted June 25, 2025 1 minute ago, royal white said: Id say this is as reliable. I don't expect anything different from the CIA press release to be honest. They're not going to admit otherwise. The one I posted was done by US intelligence as well. They would have wanted to prove more damage was done. There won't be a hidden agenda in the evidence they provided, just an honest review. Time will tell on this one. Quote
royal white Posted June 25, 2025 Posted June 25, 2025 8 minutes ago, London Wanderer said: I don't expect anything different from the CIA press release to be honest. They're not going to admit otherwise. The one I posted was done by US intelligence as well. They would have wanted to prove more damage was done. There won't be a hidden agenda in the evidence they provided, just an honest review. Time will tell on this one. You’re just dying for it to be a failure aren’t you 😂 Quote
Not in Crawley Posted June 25, 2025 Posted June 25, 2025 11 minutes ago, London Wanderer said: Stop it 😂 Listen I've just had to see Quadrophenia the ballet - I'm well in to annoy people 😁 Quote
kent_white Posted June 25, 2025 Posted June 25, 2025 We all just pick who we want to believe nowadays don't we? What a disappointing state of affairs eh? I very much expect Donald has been on the phone to this fella asking for a statement as a favour. Although this is always going to be a suspicion when you appoint a partisan to a technical/quasi independent role and they come out in support of you. I suppose we'll know who is right if Tel Aviv hasn't been reduced to an irradiated, post apocalyptic hellscape by September 😁 Quote
London Wanderer Posted June 25, 2025 Posted June 25, 2025 19 minutes ago, royal white said: You’re just dying for it to be a failure aren’t you 😂 Haha Is that the best you’ve got ? 😉 I’m not trying to argue to be honest, neither do I want Iran to have nuclear weapons. You’ll see a post from me saying credit where it’s due a day or two back. I’m just pointing out that it’s a credible intelligence report suggesting it hasn’t been set back in the way we’ve been told. Quote
kent_white Posted June 25, 2025 Posted June 25, 2025 24 minutes ago, royal white said: You’re just dying for it to be a failure aren’t you 😂 Personally I'd be happy for a few million people to be incinerated and millions more to die from radiation poisoning AND risk world war three, if it meant I could have a few moments of smug satisfaction on a football forum! ✌️😁 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.