Is it kicking off big time or is this just everyday stuff they deal with or a bit of both?

 

2 hours ago, Not in Crawley said:

Not that it matters but she'll no doubt be gone shortly - although now I know who linkedin stalked me!

That's if it's definitely her of course, and not someone just using her name and picture on Facebook to cause trouble for her. 

It does seem a bonkers thing for anybody to write, not least someone in the public eye at the BBC. 

If does turn out to be her, then I'd be surprised if she lasts a week!

I've just had a look at her profile on Facebook. The account with her name on it churns out this stuff on an hourly basis by the looks of it. 

Whoever runs it has changed the profile picture, but the rest of it is all still there to view. 

It's not protected so anybody can view all of the content which makes me think it's unlikely to be her. Whoever runs the account has 500 odd friends which isn't a huge number. They seem to be a mix of Africans, people from the US and London media types (so who knows)?

I just can't see this being genuine but stranger things have happened. Here's some more example content! Oh and this person also is obsessed with chemtrails.......

 

On 31/01/2024 at 23:51, Zico said:

That reminds me of a lad at work many moons ago who had a job interview. Last minute leaving home he realised his collar was wrinkled so decided, to save time, to iron it while wearing it -  with predictable results! 

Even dafter was the one who got home pissed and finding his oven bust decided to cook a chicken with an iron. The resulting health issues were, by all accounts, not for the squeamish 😃 

12 minutes ago, SatanGreavsie said:

That reminds me of a lad at work many moons ago who had a job interview. Last minute leaving home he realised his collar was wrinkled so decided, to save time, to iron it while wearing it -  with predictable results! 

Even dafter was the one who got home pissed and finding his oven bust decided to cook a chicken with an iron. The resulting health issues were, by all accounts, not for the squeamish 😃 

About 20 years ago, I had a friend who worked for the border force and who was invited to an interview for a job in London which he was very cagey about. And turns out later that was some secret services type organisation (MI5 type outfit, I don't remember which one). Anyway he was told not to divulge it to friends or family.

He came back from the interview crestfallen so I asked him what had happened and he explained that he'd majorly fucked it up.

He'd been taken into a room which had a replica model of central London and given a scenario. Basically that terrorists had captured a number of hostages and had them holed up in one particular building. They explained what assets he had at his disposal and then  gave him 30 minutes to come up with a plan before talking it over with the interviewers.

So I asked him what the plan was and he said something along the lines of..

"Well I'd put snipers on all of the building surrounding the one with the hostages in case they made a break for it. Then I'd make a big distraction outside while the SAS flew over the building in a helicopter. They'd land on the roof and rappell down the outside of the building one on either side of a window. The first would break the glass with a sledgehammer before throwing in a stun grenade which would temporarily blind and deafen everyone in the room. This would include the hostages which would be uncomfortable but my priority is to get them out alive. The second team member would then swing in through the broken window and take out any of the terrorists in the room. Once the room was clear, the other SAS member would round up the hostages and tell them to stay put before both of them swept the remainder of the floor incase there were any other terrorists concealing themselves. Once the area was clear they would lead the hostages to safety via the stairs in case the lift had been booby trapped"

Quite taken aback I asked him what the interviewers thought of his plan - and apparently they said.....

"Would you not try negotiating with them first?" 🤣🤣🤣

13 hours ago, kent_white said:

About 20 years ago, I had a friend who worked for the border force and who was invited to an interview for a job in London which he was very cagey about. And turns out later that was some secret services type organisation (MI5 type outfit, I don't remember which one). Anyway he was told not to divulge it to friends or family.

He came back from the interview crestfallen so I asked him what had happened and he explained that he'd majorly fucked it up.

He'd been taken into a room which had a replica model of central London and given a scenario. Basically that terrorists had captured a number of hostages and had them holed up in one particular building. They explained what assets he had at his disposal and then  gave him 30 minutes to come up with a plan before talking it over with the interviewers.

So I asked him what the plan was and he said something along the lines of..

"Well I'd put snipers on all of the building surrounding the one with the hostages in case they made a break for it. Then I'd make a big distraction outside while the SAS flew over the building in a helicopter. They'd land on the roof and rappell down the outside of the building one on either side of a window. The first would break the glass with a sledgehammer before throwing in a stun grenade which would temporarily blind and deafen everyone in the room. This would include the hostages which would be uncomfortable but my priority is to get them out alive. The second team member would then swing in through the broken window and take out any of the terrorists in the room. Once the room was clear, the other SAS member would round up the hostages and tell them to stay put before both of them swept the remainder of the floor incase there were any other terrorists concealing themselves. Once the area was clear they would lead the hostages to safety via the stairs in case the lift had been booby trapped"

Quite taken aback I asked him what the interviewers thought of his plan - and apparently they said.....

"Would you not try negotiating with them first?" 🤣🤣🤣

I would have employed him in an instant!

9 hours ago, bolty58 said:

I would have employed him in an instant!

😂😂 the worrying thing is - I believe you! 😁

It's never hard to find

And so comfortably accepted too

5 hours ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

It's never hard to find

And so comfortably accepted too

Replace the stars of David with Israeli flags and I'd have no issue with it.

13 hours ago, kent_white said:

😂😂 the worrying thing is - I believe you! 😁

As I have often implied, you are the one leftie on here who seems to have a finely tuned barometer. 

8 hours ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

It's never hard to find

And so comfortably accepted too

There's plenty of it on here too. They won't admit it though.

Edited February 4, 20242 yr by bolty58

8 hours ago, Traf said:

Replace the stars of David with Israeli flags and I'd have no issue with it.

Oh dear

1 hour ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

Oh dear

You don't believe that Israel is backed by US money?
You don't believe that Israel is breaking International law?
You don't believe there's genocide going on in Palestine?

Oh dear.

6 minutes ago, Traf said:

You don't believe that Israel is backed by US money?
You don't believe that Israel is breaking International law?
You don't believe there's genocide going on in Palestine?

Oh dear.

I don't believe the US - signified by a Z in the image 🙄 - is being paid off by Israel as the image implies

Bizarre. As thousands of children are indiscriminately slaughtered, journalists murdered and intimidated, some people's main concern is a banner thar may be offensive.

3 minutes ago, Duck Egg said:

Bizarre. As thousands of children are indiscriminately slaughtered, journalists murdered and intimidated, some people's main concern is a banner thar may be offensive.

I didn't claim it as a "main concern" but, for the record, the banner isn't just offensive it's explicitly racist (as well as simply incorrect, but that's by the by)

The fact that you and so many others on the march are blind to it is precisely why it's worth pointing it out

6 minutes ago, Duck Egg said:

Bizarre. As thousands of children are indiscriminately slaughtered, journalists murdered and intimidated, some people's main concern is a banner thar may be offensive.

Im too thick to even uderstand it

 

1 minute ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

I didn't claim it as a "main concern" but, for the record, the banner isn't just offensive it's explicitly racist (as well as simply incorrect, but that's by the by)

The fact that you and so many others on the march are blind to it is precisely why it's worth pointing it out

On that same twitter theres an image saying nuke gaza now

Just saying

1 minute ago, Casino said:

On that same twitter theres an image saying nuke gaza now

Just saying

Harry's Place?

Where?

10 minutes ago, Duck Egg said:

Bizarre. As thousands of children are indiscriminately slaughtered, journalists murdered and intimidated, some people's main concern is a banner thar may be offensive.

People can be as outraged at the actions of the Isreali government as they like, but if that outraged manifests itself in racism against Jewish people they shouldn't get a free pass

I just clicked read replies and scrolled down about a dozen tweets

I dont understand the banner other than lets stop killing kids but her message is pretty clear

1 minute ago, Casino said:

I just clicked read replies and scrolled down about a dozen tweets

I dont understand the banner other than lets stop killing kids but her message is pretty clear

Well I can't find it but I'd be willing to call that out too

The banner is claiming the US isn't intervening in Gaza because they've been paid off by the Jews (not Israel, not Zionists)

Because, of course, those rich Jews secretly control the world 🙄

1 hour ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

I don't believe the US - signified by a Z in the image 🙄 - is being paid off by Israel as the image implies

Then I've misinterpreted the image?
I saw it as the US financially backing the Israeli onslaught (which they are)

But you didn't answer my questions...
You don't believe that Israel is backed by US money?
You don't believe that Israel is breaking International law?
You don't believe there's genocide going on in Palestine?

55 minutes ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

People can be as outraged at the actions of the Isreali government as they like, but if that outraged manifests itself in racism against Jewish people they shouldn't get a free pass

Correct. I abhor Israel's current actions, but those actions are no excuse for anti-semitism.

1 hour ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

People can be as outraged at the actions of the Isreali government as they like, but if that outraged manifests itself in racism against Jewish people they shouldn't get a free pass

agree

it's turning out the other way too

folk obviously are outraged at what hamas did, but seem happy to see thousands of innocents killed in indiscrimnate retalitation, which borne from isalamophobia, imo

in summary

hamas and the current israeli regime are right cunts, but that doensn't mean all jewish and muslims are

13 minutes ago, Zico said:

hamas and the current israeli regime are right cunts, but that doensn't mean all jewish and muslims are

Correct and not all cunts are Jewish or Muslim.

1 hour ago, Duck Egg said:

Bizarre. As thousands of children are indiscriminately slaughtered, journalists murdered and intimidated, some people's main concern is a banner thar may be offensive.

Aye 👍