Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Not in Crawley said:

Not that it matters but she'll no doubt be gone shortly - although now I know who linkedin stalked me!

That's if it's definitely her of course, and not someone just using her name and picture on Facebook to cause trouble for her. 

It does seem a bonkers thing for anybody to write, not least someone in the public eye at the BBC. 

If does turn out to be her, then I'd be surprised if she lasts a week!

Posted

I've just had a look at her profile on Facebook. The account with her name on it churns out this stuff on an hourly basis by the looks of it. 

Whoever runs it has changed the profile picture, but the rest of it is all still there to view. 

It's not protected so anybody can view all of the content which makes me think it's unlikely to be her. Whoever runs the account has 500 odd friends which isn't a huge number. They seem to be a mix of Africans, people from the US and London media types (so who knows)?

I just can't see this being genuine but stranger things have happened. Here's some more example content! Oh and this person also is obsessed with chemtrails.......

 

Screenshot_20240202_105126_Facebook.jpg

Posted
On 31/01/2024 at 23:51, Zico said:

tenor.gif

That reminds me of a lad at work many moons ago who had a job interview. Last minute leaving home he realised his collar was wrinkled so decided, to save time, to iron it while wearing it -  with predictable results! 

Even dafter was the one who got home pissed and finding his oven bust decided to cook a chicken with an iron. The resulting health issues were, by all accounts, not for the squeamish 😃 

Posted
12 minutes ago, SatanGreavsie said:

That reminds me of a lad at work many moons ago who had a job interview. Last minute leaving home he realised his collar was wrinkled so decided, to save time, to iron it while wearing it -  with predictable results! 

Even dafter was the one who got home pissed and finding his oven bust decided to cook a chicken with an iron. The resulting health issues were, by all accounts, not for the squeamish 😃 

About 20 years ago, I had a friend who worked for the border force and who was invited to an interview for a job in London which he was very cagey about. And turns out later that was some secret services type organisation (MI5 type outfit, I don't remember which one). Anyway he was told not to divulge it to friends or family.

He came back from the interview crestfallen so I asked him what had happened and he explained that he'd majorly fucked it up.

He'd been taken into a room which had a replica model of central London and given a scenario. Basically that terrorists had captured a number of hostages and had them holed up in one particular building. They explained what assets he had at his disposal and then  gave him 30 minutes to come up with a plan before talking it over with the interviewers.

So I asked him what the plan was and he said something along the lines of..

"Well I'd put snipers on all of the building surrounding the one with the hostages in case they made a break for it. Then I'd make a big distraction outside while the SAS flew over the building in a helicopter. They'd land on the roof and rappell down the outside of the building one on either side of a window. The first would break the glass with a sledgehammer before throwing in a stun grenade which would temporarily blind and deafen everyone in the room. This would include the hostages which would be uncomfortable but my priority is to get them out alive. The second team member would then swing in through the broken window and take out any of the terrorists in the room. Once the room was clear, the other SAS member would round up the hostages and tell them to stay put before both of them swept the remainder of the floor incase there were any other terrorists concealing themselves. Once the area was clear they would lead the hostages to safety via the stairs in case the lift had been booby trapped"

Quite taken aback I asked him what the interviewers thought of his plan - and apparently they said.....

"Would you not try negotiating with them first?" 🤣🤣🤣

  • Members
Posted
13 hours ago, kent_white said:

About 20 years ago, I had a friend who worked for the border force and who was invited to an interview for a job in London which he was very cagey about. And turns out later that was some secret services type organisation (MI5 type outfit, I don't remember which one). Anyway he was told not to divulge it to friends or family.

He came back from the interview crestfallen so I asked him what had happened and he explained that he'd majorly fucked it up.

He'd been taken into a room which had a replica model of central London and given a scenario. Basically that terrorists had captured a number of hostages and had them holed up in one particular building. They explained what assets he had at his disposal and then  gave him 30 minutes to come up with a plan before talking it over with the interviewers.

So I asked him what the plan was and he said something along the lines of..

"Well I'd put snipers on all of the building surrounding the one with the hostages in case they made a break for it. Then I'd make a big distraction outside while the SAS flew over the building in a helicopter. They'd land on the roof and rappell down the outside of the building one on either side of a window. The first would break the glass with a sledgehammer before throwing in a stun grenade which would temporarily blind and deafen everyone in the room. This would include the hostages which would be uncomfortable but my priority is to get them out alive. The second team member would then swing in through the broken window and take out any of the terrorists in the room. Once the room was clear, the other SAS member would round up the hostages and tell them to stay put before both of them swept the remainder of the floor incase there were any other terrorists concealing themselves. Once the area was clear they would lead the hostages to safety via the stairs in case the lift had been booby trapped"

Quite taken aback I asked him what the interviewers thought of his plan - and apparently they said.....

"Would you not try negotiating with them first?" 🤣🤣🤣

I would have employed him in an instant!

Posted
5 hours ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

It's never hard to find

And so comfortably accepted too

Replace the stars of David with Israeli flags and I'd have no issue with it.

  • Members
Posted
13 hours ago, kent_white said:

😂😂 the worrying thing is - I believe you! 😁

As I have often implied, you are the one leftie on here who seems to have a finely tuned barometer. ;)

  • Members
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

It's never hard to find

And so comfortably accepted too

There's plenty of it on here too. They won't admit it though.

Edited by bolty58
Posted
1 hour ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

Oh dear

You don't believe that Israel is backed by US money?
You don't believe that Israel is breaking International law?
You don't believe there's genocide going on in Palestine?

Oh dear.

  • Members
Posted
6 minutes ago, Traf said:

You don't believe that Israel is backed by US money?
You don't believe that Israel is breaking International law?
You don't believe there's genocide going on in Palestine?

Oh dear.

I don't believe the US - signified by a Z in the image 🙄 - is being paid off by Israel as the image implies

Posted

Bizarre. As thousands of children are indiscriminately slaughtered, journalists murdered and intimidated, some people's main concern is a banner thar may be offensive.

  • Members
Posted
3 minutes ago, Duck Egg said:

Bizarre. As thousands of children are indiscriminately slaughtered, journalists murdered and intimidated, some people's main concern is a banner thar may be offensive.

I didn't claim it as a "main concern" but, for the record, the banner isn't just offensive it's explicitly racist (as well as simply incorrect, but that's by the by)

The fact that you and so many others on the march are blind to it is precisely why it's worth pointing it out

  • Moderators
Posted
6 minutes ago, Duck Egg said:

Bizarre. As thousands of children are indiscriminately slaughtered, journalists murdered and intimidated, some people's main concern is a banner thar may be offensive.

Im too thick to even uderstand it :)

 

  • Moderators
Posted
1 minute ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

I didn't claim it as a "main concern" but, for the record, the banner isn't just offensive it's explicitly racist (as well as simply incorrect, but that's by the by)

The fact that you and so many others on the march are blind to it is precisely why it's worth pointing it out

On that same twitter theres an image saying nuke gaza now

Just saying

  • Members
Posted
10 minutes ago, Duck Egg said:

Bizarre. As thousands of children are indiscriminately slaughtered, journalists murdered and intimidated, some people's main concern is a banner thar may be offensive.

People can be as outraged at the actions of the Isreali government as they like, but if that outraged manifests itself in racism against Jewish people they shouldn't get a free pass

  • Moderators
Posted

I just clicked read replies and scrolled down about a dozen tweets

I dont understand the banner other than lets stop killing kids but her message is pretty clear

  • Members
Posted
1 minute ago, Casino said:

I just clicked read replies and scrolled down about a dozen tweets

I dont understand the banner other than lets stop killing kids but her message is pretty clear

Well I can't find it but I'd be willing to call that out too

The banner is claiming the US isn't intervening in Gaza because they've been paid off by the Jews (not Israel, not Zionists)

Because, of course, those rich Jews secretly control the world 🙄

Posted
1 hour ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

I don't believe the US - signified by a Z in the image 🙄 - is being paid off by Israel as the image implies

Then I've misinterpreted the image?
I saw it as the US financially backing the Israeli onslaught (which they are)

But you didn't answer my questions...
You don't believe that Israel is backed by US money?
You don't believe that Israel is breaking International law?
You don't believe there's genocide going on in Palestine?

55 minutes ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

People can be as outraged at the actions of the Isreali government as they like, but if that outraged manifests itself in racism against Jewish people they shouldn't get a free pass

Correct. I abhor Israel's current actions, but those actions are no excuse for anti-semitism.

  • Moderators
Posted
1 hour ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

People can be as outraged at the actions of the Isreali government as they like, but if that outraged manifests itself in racism against Jewish people they shouldn't get a free pass

agree

it's turning out the other way too

folk obviously are outraged at what hamas did, but seem happy to see thousands of innocents killed in indiscrimnate retalitation, which borne from isalamophobia, imo

in summary

hamas and the current israeli regime are right cunts, but that doensn't mean all jewish and muslims are

Posted
13 minutes ago, Zico said:

hamas and the current israeli regime are right cunts, but that doensn't mean all jewish and muslims are

Correct and not all cunts are Jewish or Muslim.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.