Meanwhile in Israel

[royal white]

2 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said:

It is. I understand you're not great at context or anything beyond your view. That's fine, but don't have a pop a folk when you are just on the same dull loop.

Also, I think like you, I'm actually working tonight so boringly no time to enjoy a beer my love.

It’s really not, you’ve confused your sad pathetic self. I’m living rent free in your mind. Bless ya. 

[Cheese]

9 minutes ago, Zico said:

 

 

The full version of that is fucking brilliant.  😁

Edited July 28 by Cheese

[Not in Crawley]

6 minutes ago, royal white said:

It’s really not, you’ve confused your sad pathetic self. I’m living rent free in your mind. Bless ya. 

"Your sad pathetic self" 

Bit harsh.

Phycologist would have a field day.

[royal white]

1 minute ago, Not in Crawley said:

"Your sad pathetic self" 

Bit harsh.

Phycologist would have a field day.

What studying algae? 

[Not in Crawley]

Just now, royal white said:

What studying algae? 

😁 

To be fair when you are working nights it's a bit like texting plankton.

[bolty58]

1 hour ago, royal white said:

What studying algae? 

I think he was on about a pyskick.

[royal white]

Toodle pip

 

 

[royal white]

 

[London Wanderer]

It's all on even more of a knife edge now. Nobody would disagree that the guy deserves to die, but we have to hope that this attack doesn't escalate things further. 

[Casino]

1 hour ago, London Wanderer said:

It's all on even more of a knife edge now. Nobody would disagree that the guy deserves to die, but we have to hope that this attack doesn't escalate things further. 

indeed

israel don't give a fuck the effect their actions have on the rest of the world

not be happy until everybody gets dragged in

[Lt. Aldo Raine]

I can understand there might be well founded objections to Isreali military action in Gaza, but if eliminating the leader of the terrorist organisation that has committed atrocities against their population, and which is committed not only to the destruction of the country itself but also further terrorist attacks against it, is deemed to be off the table it's difficult to see what action would be justified

We'd be hard pressed to find another country that wouldn't act on the opportunity

[Zico]

3 minutes ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

I can understand there might be well founded objections to Isreali military action in Gaza, but if eliminating the leader of the terrorist organisation that has committed atrocities against their population, and which is committed not only to the destruction of the country itself but also further terrorist attacks against it, is deemed to be off the table it's difficult to see what action would be justified

We'd be hard pressed to find another country that wouldn't act on the opportunity

I'm all for it, especially when they don't have to murder 00s of innocents to take him out

read he was a key part of the peace negotiations though

[Lt. Aldo Raine]

7 minutes ago, Zico said:

I'm all for it, especially when they don't have to murder 00s of innocents to take him out

read he was a key part of the peace negotiations though

I'm not convinced any of the parties are seriously interested in negotiating a peace agreement

Not a lasting one anyway

[Zico]

2 minutes ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

I'm not convinced any of the parties are seriously interested in negotiating a peace agreement

Not a lasting one anyway

me neither

which is why I never bought the idea that the attacks of October 8th were delibeate to scupper the apparent close to completion peace talks 

[Lt. Aldo Raine]

Just now, Zico said:

me neither

which is why I never bought the idea that the attacks of October 8th were delibeate to scupper the apparent close to completion peace talks 

To be fair, those negotiations were between Israel and Saudi Arabiaand related to the normalisation of relations between the two countries, which are an entirely different thing

I wouldn't claim the attacks were or weren't an attempt to undermine them, but it's not at all implausible

[London Wanderer]

1 hour ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

I can understand there might be well founded objections to Isreali military action in Gaza, but if eliminating the leader of the terrorist organisation that has committed atrocities against their population, and which is committed not only to the destruction of the country itself but also further terrorist attacks against it, is deemed to be off the table it's difficult to see what action would be justified

We'd be hard pressed to find another country that wouldn't act on the opportunity

Aye

 Things are on a real knife edge right now though. More so than they have from the start. 
 

 

[boltonboris]

1 hour ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

I'm not convinced any of the parties are seriously interested in negotiating a peace agreement

Not a lasting one anyway

Awful lot more dollarz to be made out of this campaign yet, before we start asking them to reign it in

[Tonge moor green jacket]

1 hour ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

To be fair, those negotiations were between Israel and Saudi Arabiaand related to the normalisation of relations between the two countries, which are an entirely different thing

I wouldn't claim the attacks were or weren't an attempt to undermine them, but it's not at all implausible

Absolutely. 

Iran being an enemy of Saudi and Israel would like nothing more than to scupper such an agreement.

Evidence of that is regularly in full view with the sponsoring of the Houthi regime in Yemen and the attacks on shipping. 

[royal white]

3 hours ago, Casino said:

indeed

israel don't give a fuck the effect their actions have on the rest of the world

not be happy until everybody gets dragged in

Yes they should have just left him 🤦🏻

[Casino]

49 minutes ago, royal white said:

Yes they should have just left him 🤦🏻

maybe they should

hes described as not being hard line and thought to be unaware of the october attack as he would have been against it

still, you know best, and if iran pile in, i won't say i told you so

[royal white]

18 minutes ago, Casino said:

maybe they should

hes described as not being hard line and thought to be unaware of the october attack as he would have been against it

still, you know best, and if iran pile in, i won't say i told you so

Im not the one questioning a country’s military’s actions. Field Marshall Casino 

[Casino]

haha

not for all the tea in china, rambo

you don't need to be military to see a possible outcome is escalation and id prefer that didn't happen

killing somebody - on foreign soil - who just might be one of the ones to push for peace looks like somebody is trying to provoke a reaction

like i say, we'll see

[bolty58]

49 minutes ago, Casino said:

maybe they should What a surprise 

hes described as not being hard line and thought to be unaware of the october attack as he would have been against it

still, you know best, and if iran pile in, i won't say i told you so Time they did. That cancer on the globe needs cutting out. They won't though (so save your next line about Russia, China and North Korea). They just want to push some other cunt into the firing line saying "we are right behind you".

 

[Tonge moor green jacket]

4 hours ago, royal white said:

Yes they should have just left him 🤦🏻

Aye.

Large proportions of the Arab world and beyond want to see Jews eradicated; so let's criticise Israel for not giving a fuck about the effect of their actions on the rest of world!

I think the world has a far greater problem dealing with Islam and its actions on their peoples.

[Lt. Aldo Raine]

Haniyeh was filmed on camera smiling at footage of the October attacks and is on record of stating they should build on it

The only interest Hamas have in a ceasefire is to allow them to regroup whilst hostilities have ceased

And Iran are active participants in the war, not a neutral third party