Article in Sunday Express saying takeover imminent.....

but thats the point

 

you can have 100 billion and still not be able to spend

but thats the point

 

you can have 100 billion and still not be able to spend

How much are you allowed to chuck in as a contribution? Is it a percentage of turnover or something?

oh i dunno

 

to be fair, it keeps changing

 

its so complicated

oh i dunno

 

to be fair, it keeps changing

 

its so complicated

 

 

Like pensions and tax

 their owner has a part share in candy crush , and has just received 500 million. i think not

Were they not involved with the investment arm of Disney at one point?

How much are you allowed to chuck in as a contribution? Is it a percentage of turnover or something?

25% of whatever Blatter receives

yes it does

Of course with his career having gone into overdrive since leaving little old Bolton

Of course with his career having gone into overdrive since leaving little old Bolton

Not sure you can use this argument all the time

 

Some people get the pay-off, use it as a pension, fuck it I'll just count the dosh now.

 

Think it was Satan who put forward a theory, that Megson engineered his own dismissal. The continued sly digs at the fans meaning they'd inevitably turn on him, and make it toxic enough for him to be potted

Not sure you can use this argument all the time

 

Some people get the pay-off, use it as a pension, fuck it I'll just count the dosh now.

 

Think it was Satan who put forward a theory, that Megson engineered his own dismissal. The continued sly digs at the fans meaning they'd inevitably turn on him, and make it toxic enough for him to be potted

Behave

 

He went Sheff Weds and was potted from "his club" too

 

What was left of his wanky reputation, in tatters

 

Unemployable, the toxic cunt

And his record prior to us? Not brilliant, but better than average I'd say.

 

And the best of ours since Allardyce, granted tallest dwarf and all that

And his record prior to us? Not brilliant, but better than average I'd say.

 

And the best of ours since Allardyce, granted tallest dwarf and all that

You kidding??

 

7 clubs managed before us and only one where he lasted 2 years+

 

With the exception of West Brom he is universally remembered as both wank and being a twat

 

Good grief.

You're so entrenched you forget he was sacked when Sheff Weds were third too

You're so entrenched you forget he was sacked when Sheff Weds were third too

He was sacked for underachieving

 

I forgot nothing

He was sacked for underachieving

 

I forgot nothing

He has the 3rd highest win percentage in Sheff Weds history

 

They just realised he was a cnut!

He has the 3rd highest win percentage in Sheff Weds history

 

They just realised he was a cnut!

They'd lost 4 on the bounce before the steel city derby and Mandaric stated that by removing him with just 13 games to go they had a better chance of going up

 

That's how bad he was thought of

Not sure how Megson can be defended tbh. It was grim as fuck simple as that. Same as how our owners and board can be defended? We have clearly been mismanaged since we lost Sam. He is the only reason for our success. The board have fucked up all his good work. Its incompetence. I reckon some on here would make great politicians. You can twist shit whatever way you want.

Club to make a statement today after rumours of administration...

 

http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/sport/13951450.Wanderers_play_down_administration_and_job_cut_fears_at_Macron_Stadium/

No smoke without fire I reckon it's true that's why gartside and ED have been quiet why this mess has continued.

If Eddie Davies puts this club in administration I will platt shit

Will the Thai's get us cheaper if we are in administration?

Will the Thai's get us cheaper if we are in administration?

they may not want us if the assets have been sold

If Eddie Davies puts this club in administration I will platt shit

This. Would make no sense at all.

 

But there are obviously financial issues that need dealing with ASAP.

they may not want us if the assets have been sold

 

But they could buy the assets cheap

But they could buy the assets cheap

The administrators would sell to those assets to the highest bidder

 

I'd argue that "could" be another party(s) wanting those assets singularly

The administrators would sell to those assets to the highest bidder

 

I'd argue that "could" be another party(s) wanting those assets singularly

 

What assets does the club own that are of any value. Are the stadium, hotel, training ground owned by the club or external companies?