is that it now game over no chance of POTUS

 

Rayguns out

I’m guessing his speech today went down well as I haven’t seen a social media meltdown.

I’m guessing his speech today went down well as I haven’t seen a social media meltdown.

 

He stuck to the script.

The Q&A afterwards was more like his normal self.

He stuck to the script.

The Q&A afterwards was more like his normal self.

 

This is fantastic stuff from TrumpTV.

 

"This is fake news!......ok, maybe it's true, but look at this other thing instead!"

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivd8rfnV5is

Edited January 26, 20188 yr by Cheese

He stuck to the script.

The Q&A afterwards was more like his normal self.

In other words, he acted like a politician then he was more like his normal self.

In other words, he acted like a politician then he was more like his normal self.

 

So, do you think it's good that he did that?

Looking forward to the interview on ITV tonight, I’m sure the Trump haters will be out in force accusing him of being everything from a Racist Bigot to a Paedo!

Just stuck it on, I was looking forward to it, but 5 mins in and it appears he's just being arse licked by his mate

one of the worst interviews I've ever seen, piers morgan redefining the word sycophant whilst congratulating himself on a job well done as if he's took him to task or something

 

Awful

Looking forward to the interview on ITV tonight, I’m sure the Trump haters will be out in force accusing him of being everything from a Racist Bigot to a Paedo!

 

 

You're right of course but I think most of us now have become completely immune to the bleatings of the liberal elite and those who blindly follow them so that they don't have to think for themselves.

 

I am convinced now that he will see out his 4 year term and coming more and more round to the opinion that he may serve 8 years. Now wouldn't that be something to behold.

 

He has very cleverly struck US voters where it invariably matters most - the hip pocket nerve. The forces of evil will still be ranged against him of course but when the time comes to put that 'X' on a ballot paper, around 3 years of good times, prosperity and greater spending power may well have a big part to play.

My only argument Bolty, is his inability to go about his business, without being suck a cock about things.

I have no problems with his america first policy, just rather he was strong and resolute but without coming across as a spoiled child.

 

Obviously some misinformation flying about from all sides, a bit like the brexit debate, which doesn't help, but we can only judge by how he comes across in the flesh.

Edited January 29, 20188 yr by Tonge moor green jacket

You're right of course but I think most of us now have become completely immune to the bleatings of the liberal elite and those who blindly follow them so that they don't have to think for themselves.

 

I am convinced now that he will see out his 4 year term and coming more and more round to the opinion that he may serve 8 years. Now wouldn't that be something to behold.

 

He has very cleverly struck US voters where it invariably matters most - the hip pocket nerve. The forces of evil will still be ranged against him of course but when the time comes to put that 'X' on a ballot paper, around 3 years of good times, prosperity and greater spending power may well have a big part to play.

Fully agree mate.

 

The best part for me was when he was asked what he thought about Corbyn and Khan no wanting him to come to the UK.....his reply, “I don’t know who they are” haha

Fully agree mate.

 

The best part for me was when he was asked what he thought about Corbyn and Khan no wanting him to come to the UK.....his reply, “I don’t know who they are” haha

 

He's lying then.

He's lying then.

He never lies as he 'tells it like it is' so he must be a thicko.

He's lying then.

 

Indeed. 

 

@realdonaldtrump Pathetic excuse by London Mayor Sadiq Khan who had to think fast on his "no reason to be alarmed" statement. MSM is working hard to sell it! 5 Jun 2017

 

Indeed.

He probably does know them but using a tweet as an example is a bit weak...I have just replied to you yet I have no clue who you are

If he doesn't know who they are, he probably should.

 

Not that I give a fuck by the way. They're all dicks.

Fully agree mate.

 

The best part for me was when he was asked what he thought about Corbyn and Khan no wanting him to come to the UK.....his reply, “I don’t know who they are” haha

Wasn’t the reference just about Corbyn ?

 

Time to wheel this corker out again.....

 

Wasn’t the reference just about Corbyn ?

 

Time to wheel this corker out again.....

 

Haha that’s a cracker!

 

Morgan mentioned them both when he replied I don’t them

which is why it was a terrible interview

 

Morgan took him to task on nothing

 

then tried to sensationally claim he got Trump to apologise for them britain first retweets, when he did nothing of the sort, he just used word apology in his retort

 

let's have a rematch with someone like Paxman or Marr

which is why it was a terrible interview

 

Morgan took him to task on nothing

 

then tried to sensationally claim he got Trump to apologise for them britain first retweets, when he did nothing of the sort, he just used word apology in his retort

 

let's have a rematch with someone like Paxman or Marr

With Marr ?

 

Christ.....did you see his interview with Conman yesterday ?

He clearly lied over Iran and Marr never pulled him up...may as well had the chat in a sauna whilst massaging not just his ego.

 

Better someone like Andrew Neil interviewing him.

With Marr ?

 

Christ.....did you see his interview with Conman yesterday ?

He clearly lied over Iran and Marr never pulled him up...may as well had the chat in a sauna whilst massaging not just his ego.

 

Better someone like Andrew Neil interviewing him.

 

better with someone who would challenge him and not sit their drooling as he attempts to crawl further up his arse

 

Alan Carr woud've done a better job

better with someone who would challenge him and not sit their drooling as he attempts to crawl further up his arse

 

Alan Carr woud've done a better job

2 people I can't stand but I'd actually watch that.

 

Piers Morgan interviewing trump was only going to go one way.

better with someone who would challenge him and not sit their drooling as he attempts to crawl further up his arse

 

Alan Carr woud've done a better job

Likewise with Marr sucking up to Corbyn.

 

Carr’s pasties would have done a better job.

I'm sure Corbyn won't be as petty and small-minded to return the favour and disengenuously enquire "Who's he?" (of Trump) in four years time, when the former is gloriously PM of these fair Isles and the latter has slunk off back to his tawdry penthouse rental firm - having delivered nought but grief to his beleaguered country...

 

He probably does know them but using a tweet as an example is a bit weak...I have just replied to you yet I have no clue who you are

 

To use a tweet he sent six months ago where he refers to Khan as "London Mayor" and then names him (he didn't reply to or use his twitter handle, simply used his name and title)? You think thats "weak"? Do you regularly tweet about folk using their full names and job titles, then claim you don't know who they are?

 

He's a liar. I mean we didn't need this latest episode to know that. It isn't even a debate. Trump is a massive liar, who's hoodwinked loads of people into thinking he represents them. 

 

There is even an interview where he explains that if he were to ever run as president he'd target the republican "fox news" demographic as those people are "thick as mince" and will "believe anything you tell them". I'm paraphrasing but essentially that is it. And that is what he's done.