Doomandgloom Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 They were 'forced to resign' because they were unable to fulfil their professional duties. Standard practice. I posted the information simply to correct the KA version that the move was purely for commercial (i.e cost) reasons. I apologise for doing so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doomandgloom Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 They were 'forced to resign' because they were unable to fulfil their professional duties. Standard practice. I posted the information simply to correct the KA version that the move was purely for commercial (i.e cost) reasons. I apologise for doing so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doomandgloom Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 They were 'forced to resign' because they were unable to fulfil their professional duties. Standard practice. I posted the information simply to correct the KA version that the move was purely for commercial (i.e cost) reasons. The main point is that at present the Club has only qualified accounts (for 2014/2015) which would not be acceptable to the EFL. I apologise for raising the matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doomandgloom Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 They were 'forced to resign' because they were unable to fulfil their professional duties. Standard practice. I posted the information simply to correct the KA version that the move was purely for commercial (i.e cost) reasons. The main point is that at present the Club has only qualified accounts (for 2014/2015) which would not be acceptable to the EFL. I apologise for raising the matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doomandgloom Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 They were 'forced to resign' because they were unable to fulfil their professional duties. Standard practice. I posted the information simply to correct the KA version that the move was purely for commercial (i.e cost) reasons. The main point is that at present the Club has only qualified accounts (for 2014/2015) which would not be acceptable to the EFL. I apologise for raising the matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Carlos Posted June 12, 2017 Moderators Share Posted June 12, 2017 Right, you've got one post and one post only to tell us your background in terms of accountancy... Over to you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doomandgloom Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 They were forced to resign because they were unable to fulfil their professional duties. Standard practice. I post the information simply to correct the KA version that the move was purely for commercial i.e. cost reasons. The main point is that at present the Club has only qualified accounts for 2014/15 which would not be acceptable to the EFL. Let's hope that this is not repeated in the production of the 2015/16 accounts. My apologies for raising the matter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doomandgloom Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Sorry for the repeated message. It appeared to get blocked time and time again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Carlos Posted June 12, 2017 Moderators Share Posted June 12, 2017 I repeat, you've got one post to inform us of your accountancy qualifications. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doomandgloom Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 I'm sorry, I don't appreciate threats/ultimatums. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Carlos Posted June 12, 2017 Moderators Share Posted June 12, 2017 Fair does. Without qualification, your posts are pointless. Please bore off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doomandgloom Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 You could, of course, asked politely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Carlos Posted June 12, 2017 Moderators Share Posted June 12, 2017 I can ask politely if you apologise for accusing me of making threats. Do you have any qualifications or a background in accountancy, and you an expert in any field relating to this case? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
passmosster Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 The new auditors will have to be satisfied on the going concern issue before signing the accounts (i.e. refinancing complete). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kane57 Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 I don't care who owns the club as long as we win more than we lose. Appreciate this might not fit in with your view, but in the spirit of being honest.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 (edited) Were the auditors forced to resign? Edited June 12, 2017 by boltondiver Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoadRunnerFan Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 (edited) Iirc the EFL recommended using a smaller firm on cost grounds? It's good practice to change your auditors every few years anyway so the relationship isn't too cosy. If they were forced who forced them? Have they been forced to stop auditing other clubs if a body with the authority to 'force' them to resign was so unhappy with them? Edited June 12, 2017 by RoadRunnerFan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doomandgloom Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 As I have said before: they felt obliged to resign on 30the April as they were not able to get sufficient information from the directors with which to form a professional opinion. You can read the statement for yourself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 As I have said before: they felt obliged to resign on 30the April as they were not able to get sufficient information from the directors with which to form a professional opinion. You can read the statement for yourself. Not forced to resign, then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Take Hunt Off Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 My take on the situation is that SK is going to buy out SS at some stage given that Deanos 'loan' from Bluemarble has accrued quite a bit of interest this is taking a bit of time as obviously SK doesn't want to be picking up the interest tab . Bottom line is if it doesn't get resolved (which I'm sure it will) Bluemarble could end up owning 47.5% of the club Obviously this would be bad news even though I am not an accountant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sluffy Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 As I have said before: they felt obliged to resign on 30the April as they were not able to get sufficient information from the directors with which to form a professional opinion. You can read the statement for yourself. "They felt obliged to resign"? You know that definitely? Because as per the link I posted above the club had stated THE MONTH BEFORE that they had changed auditors. It would also have taken several weeks prior to that as well to choose and enter into agreement with the new auditors, particularly if a tender process was involved. So are you absolutely certain they "felt obliged to resign" as you've already come down from "FORCED to resign" - even though they were actively being replaced from the job in any event!? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gonzo Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Who gives a fuck? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sluffy Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Who gives a fuck? Well you don't obviously. I do because basically it is a question of whether you believe Anderson or not? Our friend Doomandgloom is deliberately implying Anderson is a liar and cannot be trusted. This is from the same camp as Holdsworth, the ST, LoV (certainly in the past anyway), Mr Smurf and other random axe grinders. They may be right in this for all I know but up to now non of them have brought any proof to the table of this and alternatively Anderson has seemingly acted in the best interests of the club to date. If Doomy knows something then by all means let us know what it is. If he doesn't, then he simply stirring shit. That's why I give a fuck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyldesley_white Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 Doomy keeps saying he/she knows ( or intimates that's he/she knows things) but when push come top shove never proves anything Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big E Posted June 12, 2017 Share Posted June 12, 2017 None of these fuckers have backed up their shit claims Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.