29 minutes ago, Casino said:

how many came on saturday

and friday

and thursday

 

ive no idea fwiw, but i'd not be making my mind up on one days figures from GBeebies

i also know reducing overseas aid won't reduce the numbers

You can find out yourself. It’s where ‘GBeebies’ get their figures from.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/migrants-detected-crossing-the-english-channel-in-small-boats/migrants-detected-crossing-the-english-channel-in-small-boats-last-7-days

2 hours ago, BobyBrno said:

You can find out yourself. It’s where ‘GBeebies’ get their figures from.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/migrants-detected-crossing-the-english-channel-in-small-boats/migrants-detected-crossing-the-english-channel-in-small-boats-last-7-days

gbeebies report says their fella was counting em

i know theyre not known for facts, but even I believed that bit

anyway, 4 days last week we couldve had a post saying no crossings

 

i must have missed them

and none at all w/e 23rd

 

wow

great work

Possibly figured that like United fans jibbing in to grounds that if they all pile over at once then the chances of getting through increases.

50 minutes ago, Casino said:

and none at all w/e 23rd

 

wow

great work

“Great work” 😂😂

 

2629 in 2 months, which is more than last year’s figures. I’m a little confused to this “just quietly doing their job” remark I keep seeing. 

1 hour ago, royal white said:

I’m a little confused 

we know

 

1 hour ago, royal white said:

“Great work” 😂😂

 

2629 in 2 months, which is more than last year’s figures. I’m a little confused to this “just quietly doing their job” remark I keep seeing. 

using the figures so kindly provided above, the first 2 months of this year saw a total of 2056, compared with last years 2255

if you want to make it jan 1 to the last day we have figures (mar 2) last year 2582, this year 2716

 

ive eneded up being here late now

 

jan-feb figures

 

18 - 7

19 - 133

20 - 277

21 - 532

22 - 1482

23 - 2953

24 - 2255

25 - 2056

 

7 in the first 2 months of 2018, fucking hell, well done priti

being serious for a minute, it does on this small sample, suggest that numbers may be reducing - even before labour, though maybe its just the weather

it also suggests patel, braverman and jenrick were big on words, small on action

 

itd need some more sums and i'm going home

7 minutes ago, Casino said:

using the figures so kindly provided above, the first 2 months of this year saw a total of 2056, compared with last years 2255

if you want to make it jan 1 to the last day we have figures (mar 2) last year 2582, this year 2716

 

ive eneded up being here late now

 

jan-feb figures

 

18 - 7

19 - 133

20 - 277

21 - 532

22 - 1482

23 - 2953

24 - 2255

25 - 2056

 

7 in the first 2 months of 2018, fucking hell, well done priti

being serious for a minute, it does on this small sample, suggest that numbers may be reducing - even before labour, though maybe its just the weather

it also suggests patel, braverman and jenrick were big on words, small on action

 

itd need some more sums and i'm going home

I meant to date, which I said in the post before 👍

im sure you said in 2 months

it couldve been any 2 months, but i did guess you would want to include the 'blip'

going home x

5 minutes ago, Casino said:

im sure you said in 2 months

it couldve been any 2 months, but i did guess you would want to include the 'blip'

going home x

The one before where I clearly gave the figure then “to date” 
 

So just to confirm figures are up this year. To date. 

20 minutes ago, Casino said:

using the figures so kindly provided above, the first 2 months of this year saw a total of 2056, compared with last years 2255

if you want to make it jan 1 to the last day we have figures (mar 2) last year 2582, this year 2716

 

ive eneded up being here late now

 

jan-feb figures

 

18 - 7

19 - 133

20 - 277

21 - 532

22 - 1482

23 - 2953

24 - 2255

25 - 2056

 

7 in the first 2 months of 2018, fucking hell, well done priti

being serious for a minute, it does on this small sample, suggest that numbers may be reducing - even before labour, though maybe its just the weather

it also suggests patel, braverman and jenrick were big on words, small on action

 

itd need some more sums and i'm going home

Are they official figures ares ones that GBNews have counted ? 

7 minutes ago, Ani said:

Are they official figures ares ones that GBNews have counted ? 

I’ll answer for him as he’s going home now. 
 

official 

Good news

"Service charges" are a fucking scam and this is long overdue

 

28 minutes ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

Good news

"Service charges" are a fucking scam and this is long overdue

 

Getting things done again.

Bore off Keir

1 hour ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

Good news

"Service charges" are a fucking scam and this is long overdue

 

Hilton tower in manchester  flat for sale 

Service Charge 

£35,000 PA 

12 hours ago, Casino said:

how many came on saturday

and friday

and thursday

 

ive no idea fwiw, but i'd not be making my mind up on one days figures from GBeebies

i also know reducing overseas aid won't reduce the numbers

There was no need to tell us this. You know everything don't you?

What will reduce the numbers is gunboats patrolling the channel. Escort them back to the French coast and shred their floaties.

Of course we'd have to fuck the ECHR off first. The sooner the fucking better. Saving lives.

10 hours ago, Casino said:

anyway, 4 days last week we couldve had a post saying no crossings

 

i must have missed them

Might be advisable to watch weather reports. Usually a correlation.

4 hours ago, bolty58 said:

Might be advisable to watch weather reports. Usually a correlation.

Aye.

Unless the new agreements only operate 3 or 4 days a week.

we don't actually need to leave the echr to stop the boats neither. As you say physically stop them and turn them around.

Any that get through, taken straight back.

Change our own rules to make sure any echr rules that have been incorporated into ours are removed/modified or don't apply undef certain circumstances. 

Ultimately, it's down to political will. 

5 hours ago, bolty58 said:

There was no need to tell us this. You know everything don't you?

What will reduce the numbers is gunboats patrolling the channel. Escort them back to the French coast and shred their floaties.

Of course we'd have to fuck the ECHR off first. The sooner the fucking better. Saving lives.

No we wouldn't

27 minutes ago, Sweep said:

No we wouldn't

Well we should. Too many bent lawyers stealing a living thanks to its outdated anomalies.

25 minutes ago, bolty58 said:

Well we should. Too many bent lawyers stealing a living thanks to its outdated anomalies.

maybe, maybe not, but the ECHR has no bearing on if we choose (or not) to stop people coming into this country if it's not by the correct/legal channels.

Other than Farage and his merry gang, there doesn't seem to be any political appetite to do so, so it looks like it's not going to happen any time soon

Someone needs to stop this LUNATIC spending our money. Where will it all end?

 

17 minutes ago, Spider said:

Someone needs to stop this LUNATIC spending our money. Where will it all end?

 

It sounds good but I'll have to believe that when I see it

47 minutes ago, Spider said:

Someone needs to stop this LUNATIC spending our money. Where will it all end?

 

Pensioners can sit in libraries to get warm