6 coppers to take him down or 1 member of the public with his bike? 
 

 

 

Yet another peadophile avoids deportation due to the ECHR, this time because it would be "unduly harsh" on his children for him to be removed from the country

 

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/grooming-gang-convicted-sexual-offences-30981992?utm_source=men_newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=main_daily_newsletter&utm_content=&utm_term=&ruid=3449b483-444a-412f-94c2-0d59623548d9&hx=24ea6f8a5f9297232e148052e1ea28d4699b934c3dfdad98505d0ac782d4e717

 

 

 

27 minutes ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

Yet another peadophile avoids deportation due to the ECHR, this time because it would be "unduly harsh" on his children for him to be removed from the country

 

That’s ridiculous and something he should of perhaps considered.

4 hours ago, gonzo said:

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/grooming-gang-convicted-sexual-offences-30981992?utm_source=men_newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=main_daily_newsletter&utm_content=&utm_term=&ruid=3449b483-444a-412f-94c2-0d59623548d9&hx=24ea6f8a5f9297232e148052e1ea28d4699b934c3dfdad98505d0ac782d4e717

 

 

 

Why am I not seeing an array of mug shots of the guilty to accompany this story?

1 minute ago, Zico said:

Why am I not seeing an array of mug shots of the guilty to accompany this story?

#usualsuspects

https://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/news/24926929.gang-groomed-abused-girl-blackrod-found-guilty/

3 minutes ago, Zico said:

Why am I not seeing an array of mug shots of the guilty to accompany this story?

Just for you 

 

The danger on the left with a smile on his face as he walks to court

28 minutes ago, Casino said:

#usualsuspects

 OK then, you are back to a score of 2. They other side is still leading by 176 or more.

I suppose you agree with the paedo not being deported?

7 hours ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

Yet another peadophile avoids deportation due to the ECHR, this time because it would be "unduly harsh" on his children for him to be removed from the country

 

It's a fucking mad world.

Sam Kerr walks free after racially abusing an officer of the law. Had he been of Caribbean extraction and she'd said 'stupid and black' she'd likely be doing time.

Conversely, Rubiales looks like he might be headed to prison for a stolen kiss. The evil bastard.

In the spirit of looking the other way whilst the Pakistani grooming gangs ran amok across England, a no doubt woke fucking judge lets a Pakistani paedo stay.

Roll on the roll out of The Dons common sensism. Sorely needed across the globe.

3 hours ago, bolty58 said:

It's a fucking mad world.

Sam Kerr walks free after racially abusing an officer of the law. Had he been of Caribbean extraction and she'd said 'stupid and black' she'd likely be doing time.

Conversely, Rubiales looks like he might be headed to prison for a stolen kiss. The evil bastard.

In the spirit of looking the other way whilst the Pakistani grooming gangs ran amok across England, a no doubt woke fucking judge lets a Pakistani paedo stay.

Roll on the roll out of The Dons common sensism. Sorely needed across the globe.

Edited February 12, 20251 yr by royal white

Sounds a good step forwards.  Wonder why the Tories hadn’t done this before?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c9d5wj9l8e2o

And Gino Dicampo got 2 years for scamming Paul Young??

 

3 hours ago, Bertie said:

Sounds a good step forwards.  Wonder why the Tories hadn’t done this before?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c9d5wj9l8e2o

It's a clarification of guidance on pre-existing rules

But there's scarcely any point denying citizenship when the ECHR allows immigration tribunal judges to make decisions like this:

 

2 hours ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

It's a clarification of guidance on pre-existing rules

But there's scarcely any point denying citizenship when the ECHR allows immigration tribunal judges to make decisions like this:

 

The ECHR? WTF are we remaining in that for?

1 hour ago, bolty58 said:

The ECHR? WTF are we remaining in that for?

We are, you're not 😉

 

As an aside, the guy who you like so much, Johnson, could have taken us out as part of getting "Brexit done" when he had his great whopping majority (as could Sunak, when he pretended he wanted to send people to Rwanda)  -  I'm not sure, outside of Reform, there is much appetite to take us out of it, so I presume it's not that easy.

 

For what it's worth, I'd be happy enough if we did leave it, I just don't think we ever will.

Edited February 12, 20251 yr by Sweep

7 hours ago, bolty58 said:

The ECHR? WTF are we remaining in that for?

Quick Explainer :

 

 

What is the ECHR?

The ECHR is the European Convention on Human Rights. It was drafted in the aftermath of the Second World War and the Holocaust in an attempt to protect the people from the State, make sure the atrocities committed would never be repeated, and safeguard fundamental rights.

The United Kingdom played an important role in the birth of the ECHR, with British lawyers integral to the drafting of the text, and Winston Churchill a key early advocate.

The ECHR guaranteed people’s fundamental human rights in law for the first time. The rights we are all accustomed to come from the UK signing the Convention.

Since the UK signed the Convention in 1951, it has protected us from things like torture, killing, and slavery and assures our freedom of speech, assembly, religion, privacy and much more.

1 hour ago, Gonk said:

Since the UK signed the Convention in 1951, it has protected us from things like torture, killing, and slavery and assures our freedom of speech, assembly, religion, privacy and much more.

sounds a bit woke to me.

when I were a lad we'd be tortured to death 3 or 4 times every day before breakfast and still go out and do a full day's slavery, and we fucking loved it.

2 hours ago, Gonk said:

Quick Explainer :

 

 

What is the ECHR?

The ECHR is the European Convention on Human Rights. It was drafted in the aftermath of the Second World War and the Holocaust in an attempt to protect the people from the State, make sure the atrocities committed would never be repeated, and safeguard fundamental rights.

The United Kingdom played an important role in the birth of the ECHR, with British lawyers integral to the drafting of the text, and Winston Churchill a key early advocate.

The ECHR guaranteed people’s fundamental human rights in law for the first time. The rights we are all accustomed to come from the UK signing the Convention.

Since the UK signed the Convention in 1951, it has protected us from things like torture, killing, and slavery and assures our freedom of speech, assembly, religion, privacy and much more.

Well done mate. Precisely the point.

Outdated.

Yeah...bring back slavery, and the stopping of freedom of speech.

Outdated.

It's certainly true that it was drafted without the world as it is today in mind and that as a result the wording of certain articles of the Convention are leading to absurd outcomes in the courts

Was torture, slavery and killing still a thing in England in 1951? 

Edited February 12, 20251 yr by royal white

41 minutes ago, royal white said:

Was torture, slavery and killing still a thing in England in 1951? 

You really are historically very naive.

1 hour ago, Not in Crawley said:

You really are historically very naive.

I’ll take that as a no then. 👍

Edited February 13, 20251 yr by royal white

1 hour ago, royal white said:

I’ll take that as a no then. 👍

A leopard never changes it's spots. Back to attempted belittling.