Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Ani said:

Quietly going about their job.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cd7ee895nr0o

Fine news.

Now sort NHS dentistry. Twat the charlatans buying up traditional, quality, independents and turning them into poor quality factory-type set ups, ripping people off.

Dunno if it's on here, but an arguably bigger event is Streeting targeting the non-jobs, and purging NHS England.

Top banana, and long may it continue. Maybe he's an Elon fan boy on the quiet. 😁

Posted
10 hours ago, bolty58 said:

No he isn't (he would probably like to). This is just sending out a positive smoke signal to those ethnic voters who might be swayed by the others mentioned. He's already done enough probably. A shame because his 35% share of the vote down to say 32% could only be good.

Which again would only make sense if he was in charge of sentencing. Which he isn't. 

The only real influence he would have would be in creating an atmosphere of urgency through public messaging. Which I think was exactly the right thing to do given that people were literally trying to burn asylum seekers to death at the time and we had riots all over the country. 

Do you genuinely believe that Keir Starmer would like to imprison millions of people? I'm going to assume you're taking the piss there. 

 

Posted
5 hours ago, Big E said:

Mrs e has left hers as is. No point wasting money on a new passport when not needed 

Maybe shes thinking ahead

:)

fwiw, i think jnr would get away with it, unless flights were ever booked in her married name

Posted
5 minutes ago, Casino said:

Maybe shes thinking ahead

:)

fwiw, i think jnr would get away with it, unless flights were ever booked in her married name

My wife had about 4 years left on her passport when we got married, she didn't bother to change it - we just booked under the name on the passport. (That was 20 years ago though...)

Posted
12 minutes ago, Casino said:

Maybe shes thinking ahead

:)

fwiw, i think jnr would get away with it, unless flights were ever booked in her married name

Yeah she’s keeping her powder dry. 
 

we just do maiden now for flights. 

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, Cheese said:

He said she's getting married, so presume she'll need a new one to reflect her new surname.

Generally Not required. If the booking is her maiden name then she needs to retain the existing passport so that the names match  https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5b963ab3ed915d4d86b1c066/Passports-for-newly-weds-civil-partners-PD1-201809.pdf

"Other Points 

If you hold a valid passport and don’t want to replace it with one showing your new name, you can continue to use your current passport and take your marriage or civil partnership certificate with you when you travel. However, some countries may insist that the details on your travel documents match those in your passport. HM Passport Office advises you to check with the consulate of the country you will be travelling to before booking your holiday."

Edited by Gonk
Posted
12 minutes ago, Gonk said:

Generally Not required. If the booking is her maiden name then she needs to retain the existing passport so that the names match  https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5b963ab3ed915d4d86b1c066/Passports-for-newly-weds-civil-partners-PD1-201809.pdf

"Other Points 

If you hold a valid passport and don’t want to replace it with one showing your new name, you can continue to use your current passport and take your marriage or civil partnership certificate with you when you travel. However, some countries may insist that the details on your travel documents match those in your passport. HM Passport Office advises you to check with the consulate of the country you will be travelling to before booking your holiday."

 @Casino asked the question.

Posted (edited)
21 hours ago, kent_white said:

Which again would only make sense if he was in charge of sentencing. Which he isn't. 

The only real influence he would have would be in creating an atmosphere of urgency through public messaging. Which I think was exactly the right thing to do given that people were literally trying to burn asylum seekers to death at the time and we had riots all over the country. 

Do you genuinely believe that Keir Starmer would like to imprison millions of people? I'm going to assume you're taking the piss there. 

 

Certainly not millions. For a start there is a giant elephant in the room regarding such a proposition.

I am sure that he would love to follow the lead of the US Democrats into trying to hobble the opposition by fair means or foul.

Edited by bolty58
Posted
23 hours ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Fine news.

Now sort NHS dentistry. Twat the charlatans buying up traditional, quality, independents and turning them into poor quality factory-type set ups, ripping people off.

Dunno if it's on here, but an arguably bigger event is Streeting targeting the non-jobs, and purging NHS England.

Top banana, and long may it continue. Maybe he's an Elon fan boy on the quiet. 😁

On the face of it, yes to all of the highlighted bits.

My life however has taught me never, ever to trust a socialist. They will always shit on you eventually.

Posted
4 hours ago, bolty58 said:

On the face of it, yes to all of the highlighted bits.

My life however has taught me never, ever to trust a socialist. They will always shit on you eventually.

Agree.

Perhaps he's not that much of a socialist in comparison to his colleagues? :)

Whoever starts all the clearing out of this puritanical crap gets a clap though.

Fuck knows why Rishi et al allowed it to creep so deeply, let alone deal with it remains a mystery though. 

A simple vote winner, ignored. 

Hardly traditional Conservative stuff.

 

 

Posted
19 minutes ago, royal white said:

The absolute state of them. 
 

 

Scruffy cunts, watercannons and cattle prods required. 

Ripping apart the national flag, they should be arrested and fined for that as surely it's a potential to cause "unrest" 

Posted
On 01/03/2025 at 07:52, bolty58 said:

On the face of it, yes to all of the highlighted bits.

My life however has taught me never, ever to trust a socialist. They will always shit on you eventually.

Starmer ain’t a socialist so you do not need to fight or deny the warm feelings you are developing for him. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.