All Activity

That result was better than a regular win .

Just noticed 12 months ago, came up in my news feed twice yesterday !

Yes, numerous times but not in this thread

No, for obvious reasons.

https://www.gmp.police.uk/news/greater-manchester/news/news/2025/april/tenth-man-part-of-blackrod-grooming-gang-convicted-of-sexual-offences-against-girls-under-16-handed-15-years/ Has this been mentioned on here ?

Therein lies the conundrum with us, wide open spaces will allow us to pull the opponent about and our wide men to run at / past people. When we lose the ball we need our half of the pitch to suddenly shrink by about 20%.

That's half his base! 😂

If Trump stood at his podium and said that, many would believe it.

I have it in good authority from the Vatican that George Clooney is a demon in human form - and the only way he can be prevented from manifesting his true identity, taking over the world and enslaving humanity is to keep him in a constant state of mild upset.

If they're found guilty - then I'll happily be the one to push them in. The mind boggles......

How big will the gap behind our left back be on a big pitch? 😉 Just asking.

On another note, if Spurs are in championship next season, hope their fans don't expect to play any games at 3pm on a Saturday! www.Spurs/Sky.com

That pitch wasn't good enough to put livestock on. Imagine ACD on that glorious Wembley turf.

Your secret is safe with me, mate! 😁

Indeed. There are no results in other games that could soften the blow of us losing at Bradford. And there are none that would spoil it if we won. Either way we'll take stock before Luton, and again only us winning/playing well would be accepted.

🤫 shhh

Hanging is too good . Volcano is even too good. What the fuck do you do with these people though, castration as a minimum then , should be made to live as long as possible in a place with as bad a conditions as possible, a dungeon or similar. no rehabilitation possible in my opinion , punishment is living out the rest of their lives in squalid shit conditions .

Indeed, he has a 21% share holding in a company called Global Council, and their largest client is WuXi AppTec, to the tune of around £2.5M WuXi paid £1.42M to Global Council just as Mandleson was appointed Ambassador. It may well amount to nothing, but it doesn't look good.....and I'm surprised the US didn't kick up a fuss, as I'm sure they'd have done some "research" on Mandleson as well

I don't think that message is wrong to be honest - we're now entering an era of multi party parliament, like they have in other countries. It'll be interesting to see what (if any) alliances are formed moving forward. No doubt, some seats will go uncontested, so as not to split the votes - and I suspect that Reform will be the target of everybody. Apparently though, Rupert Lowe is attracting quite a few members, from folk who think Reform are going a bit soft, so maybe Restore will be in the mix as well

China and Russia. He had his grubby little fingers in many pies. Allegedly.

The debacle re Mandelson plays very much into the hands of the challenger parties such as Reform and Greens, then Plaid in Wales and the SNP. Their message is simple ‘ the established interests in Westminster need changing.’

He's apparently what the world needed, I'm still not sure why, and I'm sure it can be explained, but he's what the world needed I think Cheese often says it, but love of Trump is a pure cult, and it's getting worse. He can fuck kids or kill them in unnecessary wars, his supporters still love him regardless, as long as George Clooney is upset (and I'm never sure why ensuring Clooney is upset is such a good thing either)

https://news.sky.com/story/former-teacher-routinely-sexually-abused-adopted-baby-before-killing-him-court-hears-13534392 Fucking hell

Links to China apparently.

So the Civil Service think they followed the rules and had no obligation to inform Starmer of the results. You do not fail vetting as such but a series of risks are assessed and these are deemed to be serious or not. If they are serious the Foreign Office decides internally if the risks can be managed or mitigated. If they think they are able to be managed or mitigated then the appointment goes ahead. Only a very restricted group of people see the actual vetting as it is strictly confidential, so Starmer would not have known and the idea he lied is seemingly nonsense. What is coming clear that not many, if any senior politicians fully understand the process and it certainly adds to idea of an inner sanctum of unelected officials with too much power. Olly Robbins seems to think they did everything right and nothing untoward happened. Ironically Starmer sacking him might open KS to more criticism as Robbins was ‘only doing his job and following the rules’ . It just seems this Govt have an unfortunate habit of shooting itself in the foot. The flags in the vetting did not relate to Epstein so god knows what it is to do with. But at the end of the day Starmers judgement was that Mandelson with all his baggage was a suitable choice (and apparently doing a good job) but he is clearly highly damaged in a political and diplomatic sense. Terrible judgement by KS.