Do you really think so?
No doubt some might try to use it for their own agenda, but I'm sure overall they want the best for the club.
Its a young organisation and no doubt have made and will make mistakes; their tone does seem aggressive; but there are questions still out there about our finances etc and I don't have a problem with them speaking to the EFL for clarification of the rules etc.
Its very easy to be critical, and we've all witnessed what's gone on, but in fairness I'm not that arsed about going down to meetings, becoming a member and trying to get involved.
It is also impossible to represent everyone's view- they have to ultimately take a majority view from their members (I presume that's happened) and go with that.
I'm happy enough with sweaty ken's efforts so far, though yet to be convinced long term, and therefore he should be allowed to get on with it- don't have a problem with a group trying to ensure the clubs future if it does tits up again though.
So long as their methods are proper and not injurious to the current boards efforts that is.