bolty58 Posted March 26, 2025 Posted March 26, 2025 10 hours ago, Sweep said: @Spider? 'Influencer' not 'effluencer' FFS. Quote
Alf Hartigan Posted March 26, 2025 Posted March 26, 2025 He certainly didn’t strike me as intelligent when he appeared on Question Time a few years ago. Sounded like an absolute bell to be honest. Quote
mickbrown Posted March 26, 2025 Posted March 26, 2025 12 hours ago, Sweep said: The strange thing is, he's actually a fairly intelligent bloke, he just has some very odd views. And now that he's basically been canceled everywhere, he has to become more and more extreme, in order to stay relevant. Like this Andrew Tate bloke, he realises the more ridiculous/controversial/extreme he is, the more popular he seems to become, with the idiots and incels who lurk around on X/Twitter There’s a few who have realised there’s a living to be made by being a cunt Easier than grafting for your money Quote
bolty58 Posted March 26, 2025 Posted March 26, 2025 1 minute ago, mickbrown said: There’s a few who have realised there’s a living to be made by being a cunt Easier than grafting for your money FFS don't tell Cheese. Quote
wiggy Posted March 27, 2025 Posted March 27, 2025 Barton claimed: “If I kicked someone in the head, there would be a lot more damage than what’s alleged in this case. I didn’t do any of it, I went to bed.” Classy Quote
RONNIE PHILLIPS Posted April 3, 2025 Posted April 3, 2025 On 01/04/2025 at 09:55, Cheese said: 😁 He's not all bad is Joey 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Quote
Cheese Posted April 9, 2025 Posted April 9, 2025 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgppp6pmymo Quote
Sweep Posted April 9, 2025 Posted April 9, 2025 Bugger, each time this thread goes to the top of the page, I open it excitedly in the hope it's going to be to report his demise. Sadly not this time. Hopefully next time. Quote
Zico Posted April 9, 2025 Posted April 9, 2025 1 hour ago, Cheese said: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgppp6pmymo He could also defend the statements if the case proceeds to trial. I really hope he tries Quote
Zico Posted September 27, 2025 Posted September 27, 2025 View this post on Instagram A post shared by THATGUYSJOKES (@thatguysjokes) Quote
frank_spencer Posted November 7, 2025 Posted November 7, 2025 On one hand I'm glad he's been found guilty as he's a cunt, on the other this will just feed his and his supporters fire about 'woke cancel culture killing free speech'. Him and his ilk aren't going anywhere as long as fellow grifters will give them a platform or their bullshit stories drive rage clicks to websites. Quote
RONNIE PHILLIPS Posted November 7, 2025 Posted November 7, 2025 (edited) 3 hours ago, frank_spencer said: On one hand I'm glad he's been found guilty as he's a cunt, on the other this will just feed his and his supporters fire about 'woke cancel culture killing free speech'. Him and his ilk aren't going anywhere as long as fellow grifters will give them a platform or their bullshit stories drive rage clicks to websites. Well the judge has set this up nicely by telling him he won't be allowed to wear the union jack scarf he was wearing for sentencing......On one hand the judge has no right to say this in my opinion......but on the other hand we will not find out how much of a free speech fighter Barton is. Edited November 7, 2025 by RONNIE PHILLIPS Quote
Ani Posted November 7, 2025 Posted November 7, 2025 3 minutes ago, RONNIE PHILLIPS said: Well the judge has set this up nicely by telling him he won't be allowed to wear the union jack scarf he was wearing for sentencing......On one hand the judge has no right to say this in my opinion......but on the other hand we will not find out how much of a free speech fighter Barton is. Strange thing for judge to say, just opens it up to ask when did they introduce a dress code in court and would he ban a Palestine flag ? Or any other country ? Reading his posts in isolation all seems a bit OTT but how many times can you use a public forum to call someone a nonce and say they went to Epstein Island without it going too far ? Is interesting that Tommy 5 names has learnt to back a bit by not actually turning up at Villa Park and rather lighting the spark and standing back. Joey do nt seem that bright and thicker than Tommy is not the image he wants to show. Quote
RONNIE PHILLIPS Posted November 7, 2025 Posted November 7, 2025 57 minutes ago, Ani said: Strange thing for judge to say, just opens it up to ask when did they introduce a dress code in court and would he ban a Palestine flag ? Or any other country ? Reading his posts in isolation all seems a bit OTT but how many times can you use a public forum to call someone a nonce and say they went to Epstein Island without it going too far ? Is interesting that Tommy 5 names has learnt to back a bit by not actually turning up at Villa Park and rather lighting the spark and standing back. Joey do nt seem that bright and thicker than Tommy is not the image he wants to show. Seems it's always the same.....girl with an Israel flag being led away at Villa park last night yet all the Palestian flag wavers allowed to get on with it. Quote
Tonge moor green jacket Posted November 7, 2025 Posted November 7, 2025 In fairness, I think she was moved because they were concerned for her safety. Perhaps the bigger issue is the proximity of the protest to the ground, and, not for the first time with such protests, heightened tensions/trouble. That, and the fact that they consider others to be unsafe- surely that should be grounds to restrict/ban these protests. Quote
Tonge moor green jacket Posted November 7, 2025 Posted November 7, 2025 1 hour ago, Ani said: Strange thing for judge to say, just opens it up to ask when did they introduce a dress code in court and would he ban a Palestine flag ? Or any other country ? Reading his posts in isolation all seems a bit OTT but how many times can you use a public forum to call someone a nonce and say they went to Epstein Island without it going too far ? Is interesting that Tommy 5 names has learnt to back a bit by not actually turning up at Villa Park and rather lighting the spark and standing back. Joey do nt seem that bright and thicker than Tommy is not the image he wants to show. Following the introduction of the online safety bill, I mentioned this, and referenced/linked reports of some websites closing over fears the owners/publishers may be taken to court. Quote
Ani Posted November 13, 2025 Posted November 13, 2025 Joey has announced today he is leaving Social Media for a period of self reflection. By what time do you think he will be back ? On the subject of pundits, has anyone seen Jay Boothroyd ? He was on that Sky programme where they review refs decisions . Jesus he was/is awful. Quote
deeane Koontz Posted November 13, 2025 Posted November 13, 2025 He'll be back in less than 24 hours. 7pm tonight if theres a female pundit on the England game Quote
Jol_BWFC Posted November 13, 2025 Posted November 13, 2025 He’ll be back on as soon as the sentence is given. All for the benefit of the pre-sentence report. Quote
Marc505 Posted November 13, 2025 Posted November 13, 2025 3 hours ago, Ani said: Joey has announced today he is leaving Social Media for a period of self reflection. By what time do you think he will be back ? On the subject of pundits, has anyone seen Jay Boothroyd ? He was on that Sky programme where they review refs decisions . Jesus he was/is awful. He does this ref watch program with Dermott Gallagher. They disagree a lot and its cringeworthy. Quote
DirtySanchez Posted November 13, 2025 Posted November 13, 2025 11 minutes ago, Marc505 said: He does this ref watch program with Dermott Gallagher. They disagree a lot and its cringeworthy. The ref watch is awful and does no one any favours How about striker watch analysing blokes paid a lot more than refs, miss open goals or penalties, or just are shit There's an obvious problem for Jay Bothroyd though Quote
L/H White Posted November 13, 2025 Posted November 13, 2025 Eni has been on every media outlet this week discussing Joey It's borderline harassment at this point Quote
Marc505 Posted November 13, 2025 Posted November 13, 2025 19 minutes ago, DirtySanchez said: The ref watch is awful and does no one any favours How about striker watch analysing blokes paid a lot more than refs, miss open goals or penalties, or just are shit There's an obvious problem for Jay Bothroyd though I couldn't work out if their disagreements are just an act, but Gallagher does look genuinely uncomfortable and irritated when he interrupts him constantly Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.