onlyoneawalker Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 You can blame him for a few things but that's not one of them. Yes it is, he tells gartside where he wants to spend his budget and if thats retaining the squad we have / had then that's what gartside trys to do - the baord run negotitations fair enough but he is cullpable also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpiritofBurnden Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 Yes it is, he tells gartside where he wants to spend his budget and if thats retaining the squad we have / had then that's what gartside trys to do - the baord run negotitations fair enough but he is cullpable also. No it isn't. He doesn't decide what to pay a player. If a player asks for more than the club can afford, then it's not his decision to take. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobcat Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 that's three weeks on the bounce he's made shocking team selections... a fucking dressing room revolt is needed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onlyoneawalker Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 No it isn't. He doesn't decide what to pay a player. If a player asks for more than the club can afford, then it's not his decision to take. ratshit coyle manages the budget he gets from the board and he spends it on wages, loan fees, transfer fees if he wants to keep a player desperately he apportions more of his budget to that under the parameters set by the board - he's contributed to the running down of 11 first team squad players contracts becuase he's in the midst of his revolution the one that's getting us rapidly relegated, who do you think decides if a player is getting offered a new deal the manager or the chairman - I'm not necessarily saying some of those players should nt be shown the door but all of them at once and for no fee's? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpiritofBurnden Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 coyle manages the budget he gets from the board and he spends it on wages, loan fees, transfer fees No he doesn't. He decides who he wants to sign. The club negotiate transfer fees, wages, etc. who do you think decides if a player is getting offered a new deal the manager or the chairman? The owner of the club decides if we can afford it. For example Matt Taylor was in the last year of his contract. He was one of the highest earners at the club. The club are trying to reduce the wage bill and spending on transfers, so we took West Ham's offer, rather than let him leave for nothing at the end of this season. If Coyle wanted to keep him, do you honestly think that Eddie Davies would have just handed him the cheque book and let him get on with it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter North Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 Owen Cunt? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tarian1979 Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 According to Stuart Hall on Five Live, Eddie Davies told him that it will cost the best part of ?7M to get rid of the manager and backroom staff. I can't see them sacking him if that's the case, because that's potentially the Cahill money gone, which would give us no funds to tempt a new manager with. Perhaps the cub are hoping he'll walk and save them that sort of outlay. pathetic really that the main consideration is how much to get shut rather than if hes up to the job. we deserve to be sent packing to the championship Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter superjohnmcginlay Posted December 10, 2011 Site Supporter Share Posted December 10, 2011 he aint even the reet man to bring us back, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onlyoneawalker Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 No he doesn't. He decides who he wants to sign. The club negotiate transfer fees, wages, etc. The owner of the club decides if we can afford it. For example Matt Taylor was in the last year of his contract. He was one of the highest earners at the club. The club are trying to reduce the wage bill and spending on transfers, so we took West Ham's offer, rather than let him leave for nothing at the end of this season. If Coyle wanted to keep him, do you honestly think that Eddie Davies would have just handed him the cheque book and let him get on with it? So coyle has no input on players that come and go? Course he fucking does yes within the financial constraints of the board, you're missing my point. All managers except roberto mancini work under the parameters set by the board but they have an awful lot to say about who comes and goes and therefroe coyle is cullpable re having nearly half the squad potentially out of contract a fact that doesn't help our current situation in my view. matt taylor was let go because it made sense coyle will have seen that and it allowed him to start his marquee signing petrov and created a space to get eagles in - if coyle thought he really wanted him then I'm sure we probably could have kept him. Do you think coyle just sat at home hoping gartside would offer holden a new deal or sat down at the appropriate meeting and said get that lad signed up he is a massive part of my plans? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Casino Posted December 10, 2011 Moderators Share Posted December 10, 2011 So coyle has no input on players that come and go? Course he fucking does yes within the financial constraints of the board, you're missing my point. All managers except roberto mancini work under the parameters set by the board but they have an awful lot to say about who comes and goes and therefroe coyle is cullpable re having nearly half the squad potentially out of contract a fact that doesn't help our current situation in my view. matt taylor was let go because it made sense coyle will have seen that and it allowed him to start his marquee signing petrov and created a space to get eagles in - if coyle thought he really wanted him then I'm sure we probably could have kept him. Do you think coyle just sat at home hoping gartside would offer holden a new deal or sat down at the appropriate meeting and said get that lad signed up he is a massive part of my plans? look mate, when spirit of burnden starts showing you up, you need to let it go you're way off the mark i can give loads of reasons coyle needs to go, but none of em are what you are waffling on about Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpiritofBurnden Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 So coyle has no input on players that come and go? I didn't say that. Coyle has his say but the final decision is down to the club. They decide whether we can afford it, not the manager. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirk St Moritz Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 he aint even the reet man to bring us back, won't we have to offer him a new contract to do so? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickbrown Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 I'm totally baffled by the fella. I have no clue what he is trying to do anymore. It's like he's playing anti fantasy football. And corners? Jesus wept man - open your bleeding eyes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobcat Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 (edited) 7 million to get rid.... sack him for false representation .... fucking fraud... only one "barclays premier league" from him this week as well.. the cunts slipping oh and mickey...didn't he promise us fantasy football ? Edited December 10, 2011 by Bobcat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superkev Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 I've got a season ticket, today was shit, I've still paid for a season ticket though. That'll learn them if I don't turn up. Serious question. Can you get your money back from your season ticket?. Sat in the same seat for 13 years but it's upsetting me too much watching this shite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
no balls Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 Serious question. Can you get your money back from your season ticket?. Sat in the same seat for 13 years but it's upsetting me too much watching this shite. What you asking me for, I've no idea. Either way, if you read back a couple of seasons everyone was saying it was worse back then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Carlos Posted December 10, 2011 Moderators Share Posted December 10, 2011 What a load of bollocks, I've stood on the Paddock singing "we'll support you ever more" when Aldershot sent us down to Division 4. That's upset for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 Your time is up. Hope your happy with your fun days on a friday you shit cunt The time to go has come & gone Nero is still fiddling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onlyoneawalker Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 Same here Absolutely no idea what purpose pratley serves. must be in the top 5 worst prem centre mids ever. woeful. slow, garbage in possession, always wrong side when we havent got the ball. gash Spot bloody on that it's infuriating BUT is that down to coyle asking him to try and get beyond the strikers and then when we give the ball away almost instantly he's got 50/60 yards to make up to get back - and he is also utter gash Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roybarker Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 That Pratley is stealing a living,he`s crap!!!!!!. Midfield today was absolute shite, Davies starting again, what a fucking joke, the entire clubs a joke. Coyle my patience with you has finally gone, time to go because your out your depth. totally agree -add boyata (no problem with the boy himself,but he was brought in in case we sold cahill,so why play him at RB instead of steinson) clueless-should have at least done a triple substitution at HT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tipster Ste Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 Coyle is so blinkered on picking the players he brought to the club. Questions to ask:- As he brought a better half back to the club than Steinnson As he brought a better centre midfielder than Mumaba We all apart from the manager know the answer to the above!! Team selection and his summer signings are a complete shambles. We are in a worst state than when Sammy Lee departed and it's 2 months later. Look at everyone else's results, Sunderland, Villa only away wins at the Reebok! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZiggyStardust Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 Coyle is so blinkered on picking the players he brought to the club. Questions to ask:- As he brought a better half back to the club than Steinnson. Mears. Possibly, but we don't know. As he brought a better centre midfielder than Mumaba. Holden We all apart from the manager know the answer to the above!! Team selection and his summer signings are a complete shambles. We are in a worst state than when Sammy Lee departed and it's 2 months later. Look at everyone else's results, Sunderland, Villa only away wins at the Reebok! Carry on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobcat Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 he's right about the sammy lee bit though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ani Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 today was terrible, no passion on or off the pitch. the weakest midfield i could imagine. sadly in his interview he seemed to think we deserved something. eagles mom was a special moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 10, 2011 Share Posted December 10, 2011 He should have the common decency and charity to resign Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts