burnden Posted December 27, 2011 Posted December 27, 2011 http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11672/7396956/?utm_medium=facebook&utm_source=twitterfeed_BoltonWanderers Coyle is ready to wield the axe ahead of a must-win encounter against Wolves on New Year's Eve. "If I have got one or two coming back from injury and young kids ready to play then so be it." Quote
freds dad Posted December 27, 2011 Posted December 27, 2011 That's rickets in then. It will be like a new signing Quote
Mounts Kipper Posted December 27, 2011 Posted December 27, 2011 My view is that yesterdays starting 11 is good enough to beat wolves, Coyle once again is going to chop and change giving the team no continuity, the players who will likely come in are no better than the ones that he drops, the only axe that should fall is the one hovering over his neck, I see he took no blame for dragging Muamba off what a self righteous fool he is. Quote
HomerJay Posted December 27, 2011 Posted December 27, 2011 (edited) Aye another shit coyle signing Yes I know didn't sign him, but get chosen ones influence will no doubt mean he is now as shit everyone else Edited December 27, 2011 by HomerJay Quote
freds dad Posted December 27, 2011 Posted December 27, 2011 So he's told some of the players that they will be earning their ?30k a week either sat on the bench or sat in the stand? Bet they're shitting themselves Quote
magic legs Posted December 27, 2011 Posted December 27, 2011 If he plays Pratley ahead of Muamba.... If Ricketts is up to it I'd have him in for Boyata and maybe start Tuncay up front. Quote
onefinfrandsen Posted December 27, 2011 Posted December 27, 2011 thought we played ok yesterday for 70 mins, we looked like we had a bit of belief, something we have nt shown for while. the worrying thing is we will now go back to how it was before the blackburn game. Quote
Guest Posted December 27, 2011 Posted December 27, 2011 http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11672/7396956/?utm_medium=facebook&utm_source=twitterfeed_BoltonWanderers Coyle is ready to wield the axe ahead of a must-win encounter against Wolves on New Year's Eve. "If I have got one or two coming back from injury and young kids ready to play then so be it." Needs to diagnose the problem correctly before making any changes Quote
Ani Posted December 27, 2011 Posted December 27, 2011 Needs to diagnose the problem correctly before making any changes correct his latest attempt at changing things went wrong Quote
HomerJay Posted December 27, 2011 Posted December 27, 2011 If he carries on blaming the players and not taking his share of the blame, there's no hope for any of us Quote
Gloria Stitz Posted December 27, 2011 Posted December 27, 2011 This means we're gonna have Davies back in the side and probably Ricketts. Because N'gog is only allowed one bad game before he's out for ten and Davies can have ten bad games before he's out for one. Personally, I find it mystifying that he's yet to start Tuncay is his best position. Thanks for reading, Gloria. Quote
HomerJay Posted December 27, 2011 Posted December 27, 2011 I wouldnt be surprised to see skd backin the team now, even though ngog has barely had a chane to impress whereas skd seemed to have loads of bad games before he was dropped. I'd rather we gave tuncay a start in his preferred position really Quote
Guest Posted December 27, 2011 Posted December 27, 2011 I wouldnt be surprised to see skd backin the team now, even though ngog has barely had a chane to impress whereas skd seemed to have loads of bad games before he was dropped. I'd rather we gave tuncay a start in his preferred position really Good idea, but where does Tuncay fit into 442? Quote
Gloria Stitz Posted December 27, 2011 Posted December 27, 2011 I'd partner N'Gog with Tuncay. Klasnic slipped back into lazy ineffective mode yesterday and Davies offers nothing. N'Gog and Tuncay is a partnership that offers plenty of movement. Neither are afraid to drop back into midfield to win possession, both are capable of holding the ball up, and they both do their fair share of running and pressing. Thanks for reading, Gloria. Quote
Guest Posted December 27, 2011 Posted December 27, 2011 I'd partner N'Gog with Tuncay. Klasnic slipped back into lazy ineffective mode yesterday and Davies offers nothing. N'Gog and Tuncay is a partnership that offers plenty of movement. Neither are afraid to drop back into midfield to win possession, both are capable of holding the ball up, and they both do their fair share of running and pressing. Thanks for reading, Gloria. He's not a forward, though Quote
HomerJay Posted December 27, 2011 Posted December 27, 2011 Good idea, but where does Tuncay fit into 442? I'd play ngog with Tuncay. Klasnic was lazy and ineffective myesterday and Davies offers very little N'Gog and Tuncay would offer lots of movement. Blue both would drop back into midfield to win possession, plus they are capable of holding the ball up. they both do plenty of running and pressing. All IMO of course Quote
Juan.Kerr Posted December 27, 2011 Posted December 27, 2011 Performance on the pitch was alright. It was tinkering by OC that cost. I know we hardly looked like scoring, but neither did they until Muamba went off. Quote
DomRepWanderer Posted December 27, 2011 Posted December 27, 2011 I think K Davies would muller Wolves defence, it's a game where we need his bullying and aerial ability as both teams favour long ball tactics, having said that I don't know who would be better suited to his flick ons Klasnic or N'gog. Maybe play Davies up top on his own with a 5 man midfield, and M Davies playing just behind him, fuck knows but something needs to happen. Quote
SnoopJohnnyJohn Posted December 28, 2011 Posted December 28, 2011 Am I the only who doesn't have this love-in with Tuncay. Each time I've seen him he's been really slow, wants too much time on the ball and has been largely ineffective. That being said, so has the rest of the team. Quote
Mona Posted December 28, 2011 Posted December 28, 2011 Drunk as skunk but .... Team against the cut price wanderers Drop Cahill !!!!! No bloody passion - sod off and good riddance, and strangely the only player OC hasn't criticised !!!!! Aart from eagles Jussi Robinson Wheats Knight Steinsson Mavies NRC Gardner Tuncay Ngog Davies And fight hard & dirty !!!!! Just like the old days And when OC blames anyone for a defeat, kick the shit out of him He was only any good as a striker because of Super John , maybe we should have made him our manager ??? at least we'd all be p****ed together Quote
glossopWANDERER Posted December 28, 2011 Posted December 28, 2011 i don't care who he plays as long as he gets robbinson back out of the team Quote
awandering Posted December 28, 2011 Posted December 28, 2011 No doubt come Saturday he will backtrack on his statement and play a similar team to the last game, but interpreting "If I have got one or two coming back from injury and young kids ready to play then so be it." He must be planning to start Ricketts and Riley, as they are the only ones coming back from injury that I can think of (Davis is not registered), unless he is including Steinsson (back from illness). As for young kids, I guess, he is thinking of playing one of Connolly, Blakeman, Vela, O'Halloran or Eaves. Though I think Blakeman is the only likely option, I can't see Connolly starting ahead of Wheater, or Eaves as he is just returning from injury. I would though give a couple of them a game at Macclesfield. I'd start with Jussi, Steinsson / Riley, Cahill, Wheater, Ricketts, Muamba, Reo Coker, M Davies, Petrov, Tuncay, Klasnic Subs Bogdan, Steinsson / Riley, Knight, Eagles, Ngog, O'Halloran, Blakeman Quote
BOWTUN BAKED Posted December 28, 2011 Posted December 28, 2011 Oh god, buggery. Just had a flashback. "ice got, that eighties feeling, woh hoh, that eighties. Feeling"........ Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.