. And he'll be a much better friend to the UK than her.

 

Well we don't know that yet do we?

 

Throughout his campaign he's spoken about protecting American jobs and imposing tariffs on imported goods   -   granted he might not follow through with this. If he does though, then he might not come across as overly friendly to us

No I don't he needs to be strong leader to fight US corner abroad and deal with issues at home it's a tough job with tough hard decisions to be made and from what I see he's a much better option than Clinton. And he'll be a much better friend to the UK than her.

 

How does being an outright bellend make him strong?

 

Just spouting absolute shit and offending folk does not equate to being strong, He might be weak as piss.

Edit

Edited November 11, 20169 yr by Smiffs

Well we don't know that yet do we?

 

Throughout his campaign he's spoken about protecting American jobs and imposing tariffs on imported goods   -   granted he might not follow through with this. If he does though, then he might not come across as overly friendly to us

 

Not when he finds out I've just opened up a hairspray factory selling cheaper than anyone on the planet.

 

Up there for thinking...

It funny over here now the people you support the GOP are all saying we need to come together now for the good of the US , these are the same people who have done exactly the fuck opposite for the last 8 year since a black man had the nerve to move into the white house, had a chat with someone this morning about the burning of the US flag they where up in arms about it ,I just told them that maybe they are just being very un PC, and for the last 12 months you've love the 'lets cut the PC bullshit' cant have it both ways. they went very quite and walked off.

How does being an outright bellend make him strong?

 

Just spouting absolute shit and offending folk does not equate to being strong, He might be weak as piss.

Yes you might be right but my impression of him is he won't be weak.

Yes you might be right but my impression of him is he won't be weak.

 

I also doubt he's weak, I think he's a bell-end, but you don't get to where he has in the world of business by being weak

I also doubt he's weak, I think he's a bell-end, but you don't get to where he has in the world of business by being weak

Paris Hilton has made more with her inheritance than Donald did with his 'small loan' I wouldn't want her as president of the USA either.

Being a stubborn gobshite won't work as president

Say what you like about Obama - whether you agree with his politics or not - he's a hell of an orator.

 

When he speaks - I feel like he's addressing the whole world - rather than just the US.

Well Kent you will not be getting that with Trump.

Say what you like about Obama - whether you agree with his politics or not - he's a hell of an orator.

 

When he speaks - I feel like he's addressing the whole world - rather than just the US.

I think history will reflect very well on Obama

 

It's worth remembering he came in just as the banking system collapsed, all his pre election plans went out the window before he even stepped foot in the White House

 

I think all things considered he handled all that very well

 

I'd dred to think what would have happened with someone else in charge more inclined to let the whole thing collapse than put public money in

Prefer Trumps chances than Clintons. Not getting the link between Trumps character and whether of he will be a successful president or not. Go Donald,

Spider doesnt seem to get it was a 2 horse race and clearly he has a better relationship opportunity with Putin than Clinton.

and as well as the banking crises he also pulled the auto industry out of the shit ( due to the banking collapse ) Bush and the GOP was just going to let it go to the wall but he realized how many direct and also how many indirect jobs that would cost

Spider doesnt seem to get it was a 2 horse race and clearly he has a better relationship opportunity with Putin than Clinton.

Short term yes, medium to long term I'm not so sure

 

If Trump goes down the whole isolationist route and fucks NATO off as he has suggested then Putin would love this and they would get on great

 

it's very plausible that Russia would at some point invade the Baltics as they have done with the Ukraine. Depending on how far Putin would decide to take it but the yanks would have to get involved at some point I'd imagine with things then being much more hostile

 

With Clinton at the helm it would have been frosty from day 1 but much less likely to escalate in the medium / long term IMO

Edited November 11, 20169 yr by birch-chorley

and as well as the banking crises he also pulled the auto industry out of the shit ( due to the banking collapse ) Bush and the GOP was just going to let it go to the wall but he realized how many direct and also how many indirect jobs that would cost

He also kept Guantanamo bay open

 

Reduced the rate at which nuclear weapons were bring destroyed.

 

Built electronic surveillance by the government into law

 

He seems a lot more popular abroad than in America. I think he is great but there is a lot of stuff that has gone on that is less publicised.

 

For the Trump supporters interested how you will feel if there is another big terrorist attack fuck knows how he will react.

He also kept Guantanamo bay open

 

Reduced the rate at which nuclear weapons were bring destroyed.

 

Built electronic surveillance by the government into law

 

He seems a lot more popular abroad than in America. I think he is great but there is a lot of stuff that has gone on that is less publicised.

 

For the Trump supporters interested how you will feel if there is another big terrorist attack fuck knows how he will react.

 

I guarantee  he'll say 'really, really' and 'very, very' a lot

For the Trump supporters interested how you will feel if there is another big terrorist attack fuck knows how he will react.

That'll be interesting, and I suspect those who mean us harm know this. I don't think it'll be too long after he gets the gig properly, in January, that an "event" happens

Edited November 11, 20169 yr by Sweep

That'll be interesting, and I suspect those who mean us harm know this. I don't think it'll be too long after he gets the gig properly, in January, that an "event" happens

 

9/11 was an inside job, remember . . . 

Edited November 11, 20169 yr by madthatter

9/11 was an inside job, remember . . .

Is it just me or are more and more folk buying into this Rothschild conspiracy theory?

 

Had a few last week on FB banging about the whole US election being rigged by them so Trump was the candidate that list to get Clinton in. They have been quiet this week

 

Another lad today posted a video about it and apparently they instigated 9/11 so they could get their hands on Afghanistans central bank??? Fucking loopy

Edited November 11, 20169 yr by birch-chorley

I think yesterday Trump said he was going to reopen the 9/11 investigation. he may not make to is own swearing in

Is it just me or are more and more folk buying into this Rothschild conspiracy theory?

 

Had a few last week on FB banging about the whole US election being rigged by them so Trump was the candidate that list to get Clinton in. They have been quiet this week

 

Another lad today posted a video about it and apparently they instigated 9/11 so they could get their hands on Afghanistans central bank??? Fucking loopy

 

Rothschild specifically, nah.  I highly doubt there's a Bond type villain stroking a cat in a cave somewhere secretly running the world . . . or is there?!?

 

Still, more and more corporations are gaining much more power and political influence and have been aided in this by western governments post 9/11.  Smoke fire and all that.  I definitely feel that the military industrial complex is real; but it represents a 'bad' side of humanity that has been allowed to run rampant rather than an inter-generational plan to gain world dominance.

 

People certainly profit from war - always have done.

 

re 9/11 - what gets me there are the inconsistencies in the day's events and rather hasty (and undemocratic/unconstitutional - one of 'em anyways) inquest that, still to this day, will not be discussed by anyone from the establishment.  If 3000 people were murdered in cold blood and a man was sentenced but new evidence came to light you would have grounds for a retrial, no?  

 

It's when folks questions are flat out ignored, or ridiculed, that my attention is grabbed . . .

I think yesterday Trump said he was going to reopen the 9/11 investigation. he may not make to is own swearing in

 

If that is true then I fear he may accidentally, brutally cut off his own head whilst combing his hair  

It sounds mental but Americee invented Al Qaeda didn't they so to give them a bum rap so they could kill their own monster. Actually no, it's all a bit tin foil hat. America will one day though learn that arming one lot of nutters to kill some other nutters never ends well. Maybe the insular view will stop it. Again no, but I can see the logic, sort of.

He also kept Guantanamo bay open

 

Reduced the rate at which nuclear weapons were bring destroyed.

 

Built electronic surveillance by the government into law

 

He seems a lot more popular abroad than in America. I think he is great but there is a lot of stuff that has gone on that is less publicised.

 

For the Trump supporters interested how you will feel if there is another big terrorist attack fuck knows how he will react.

More of Obama's results........

 

Race relations deteriorating.

 

A mess in his flagship healthcare programme,

 

Relations with Russia at a low point

 

A mess of a policy in Syria

 

His cuntish comments about the UK being at the back of the queue for trade deals

Bit harsh some of that. Putin is one dangerous fucker and I don't think Obama can be blamed for relations not being great.

Obama has also suffered from not being able to get things implemented by their system.

I'm sure he's far from perfect but he appears a far more balanced human and more presidential than either of the two we've just seen.