Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Politics

What is that "mate" of mine Sadiq Khan trying to achieve ?

 

You lost you demented little cretin, get over it and concentrate on your job you terrorist sympathiser.

This is part 1 of the Politics discussion.
  • Replies 102.9k
  • Views 5m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Topics in this Discussion

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • TM Trotter
    TM Trotter

    And there's me thinking that 'pensions are not a benefit' would be the most ridiculous thing I'd read today.  Never had anything given to you? Your generation were able to buy property on 3x an a

  • Pulling our current shit show of a government up for the absolute shit show they've precided over isn't depressing. Speaking and fighting for change with a proper plan and backing the people to d

  • I've been through this a million times yet you refuse to listen. I work in an area where it is happening. It's been happening a while and all of sudden it's happening an even further faster rate.

Posted Images

Featured Replies

16 minutes ago, gonzo said:

It was big enough of a concern in other countries to get banned.

Again you dispel stuff like this as reform crank stuff. 

The same reform who are up on the tracks now as the main opposition.

Stuff like this is an issue for people, same as the boats same ad anything that swings votes.

It's an issue whether you think it is or not.

Ok well are you prepared to more council tax to enforce it?

35 minutes ago, Farrelli said:

Dear god. 

You really aren't comfortable with people having opinions that differ from yours are you. Anything that doesn't follow Guardianista thought patterns and you are in shock that such people could ever exist. 

There's a new phrase. It came originally from an anti-woke Labour peer called Lord Glasman. He describes the "lanyard classes". Essentially preening elitists who grab hold of any and every opportunity to parade their moral superiority to the grubby masses. Those folk are rife inside the public sector I'm afraid. 

Maybe Lord Glasman's thoughts will take hold within the Labour party and it will genuinely become a party that properly represents working people again. Maybe other parties will follow suit. Be quite some turnaround if it did. And folk with your wokey view of the world would be left high and dry.

 

Edited by paulhanley

Just now, London Wanderer said:

IMG_2802.jpeg

I rest my case. How many of those do you think were identified and what do you think would have prevented many from being identified? 

1 minute ago, Farrelli said:

Ok well are you prepared to more council tax to enforce it?

Yes.

1 minute ago, Farrelli said:

Ok well are you prepared to more council tax to enforce it?

It can come from the fines. 

20 minutes ago, royal white said:

If you think thats the reason then you’re more stupid than I thought. 

Hahaha.

3 minutes ago, gonzo said:

In burkas? 

Fucking loads.

Blackpool prom in the midweek you see loads. I work in Blackburn, Preston, Nelson etc. You see loads up and down the high street.

It looks fucking awful.

There was a large family at haven the other month too. Mum's in the pool with a bin bag on. 

Ah. So it's about how it "looks". How do you know they're not Nuns?

And in what way have they made your life worse?

Just now, paulhanley said:

You really aren't comfortable with people having opinions than differ from yours are you. Anything that doesn't follow Guardianista thought patterns and you are in shock that such people could ever exist. 

There's a new phrase. It came originally from an anti-woke Labour peer called Lord Glasman. He describes the "lanyard classes". Essentially preening elitists who grab hold of any and every opportunity to parade their moral superiority to the grubby masses. Those folk are rife inside the public sector I'm afraid. 

Maybe Lord Glasman's thoughts will take hold within the Labour party and it will genuinely become a party that properly represents working people again. Maybe other parties will follow suite. Be quite some turnaround if it did. And folk with your wokey view of the world would be left high and dry.

 

Not a problem with opinions but you have just introduced a whole load more complicated issues on councils operations and management which was not what we were discussing. Just on the issue of masks, I’m not in favour as it will mean higher bills and we have bigger issues of concern IMO.

5 minutes ago, kent_white said:

So that means you do just want to target Muslim women in particular? Which is the opposite of what I thought you were saying the other day (which I agreed with). IE - that it would have to apply to everyone across the board (like chavs wearing face coverings for example). Apologies if that wasn't you btw. I had it in my head that it was. 

Like I said - of someone can come up with a workable idea - that applies to everybody mostly equally then I would consider it on its merits. If it's just targeting Muslim women - I think it's more problematic. 

And I take your point about it possibly being used as a tool of oppression - but I'd need to do a lot more reading about what the evidence says about why Muslim women in the UK say they wear a Burka. I imagine there are a sizeable number who wear one out of choice. 

We'd be talking about socially engineering them away from having that choice in this instance. 

The conversation is about Burkas.

Yes I'd 100% ban balaclavas too. Road men and those scruffs supporting Palestine etc.

I already thought they were tbh. Especially in shops.

But bringing fancy dress and silly things like that into is just, well, silly.

The reasons for banning one lot are different to the other. 

I'd ban these roadmen whoppers because they cause grief and hide their faces to commit crimes.

I'd ban the Burka for reason Ive already said.

Stag dos are fine :)

3 minutes ago, gonzo said:

Yes.

Well fine. I would rather we focussed on bigger issues. 

Just now, Farrelli said:

Well fine. I would rather we focussed on bigger issues. 

Which is fair enough. But it's just a discussion isn't it.

15 minutes ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

I'd not argue in favour of a burqa ban, but if someone - whoever they are - wears one each and every time they're in public it's a literal barrier to integrating into and participating fully in society

How is it a "literal barrier"? Are you deaf, therefore you need to lip read? Do you speak to every single person you meet when you're out and about?

3 minutes ago, Cheese said:

Ah. So it's about how it "looks". How do you know they're not Nuns?

And in what way have they made your life worse?

🤦🏻🤦🏻 Jesus 

2 minutes ago, gonzo said:

The conversation is about Burkas.

Yes I'd 100% ban balaclavas too. Road men and those scruffs supporting Palestine etc.

I already thought they were tbh. Especially in shops.

But bringing fancy dress and silly things like that into is just, well, silly.

The reasons for banning one lot are different to the other. 

I'd ban these roadmen whoppers because they cause grief and hide their faces to commit crimes.

I'd ban the Burka for reason Ive already said.

Stag dos are fine :)

What if Muslim women start wearing gorilla masks to hide their faces?

2 minutes ago, Cheese said:

Ah. So it's about how it "looks". How do you know they're not Nuns?

And in what way have they made your life worse?

I'm not answering the first question as it's just fucking ridiculous.

The 2nd. I've told you, I just don't like them and I'm not alone, clearly.

Not that I have to explain everything to you.

 

2 hours ago, Spider said:

Presumably we’re all ok with national ID cards as well then?

 

We should be, fuck knows why folk don't want them

1 minute ago, Cheese said:

What if Muslim women start wearing gorilla masks to hide their faces?

What are you mentioning Gorilla's?

That's clearly racist.

1 minute ago, gonzo said:

Which is fair enough. But it's just a discussion isn't it.

Of course. It just surprises me when there is an epidemic of shoplifting, house break ins, anti social behaviour and other similar crimes which are being very poorly controlled in our cities.

2 minutes ago, Farrelli said:

Of course. It just surprises me when there is an epidemic of shoplifting, house break ins, anti social behaviour and other similar crimes which are being very poorly controlled in our cities.

I wonder if any of those committing the crimes wore face coverings 

6 minutes ago, gonzo said:

I'm not answering the first question as it's just fucking ridiculous.

The 2nd. I've told you, I just don't like them and I'm not alone, clearly.

Not that I have to explain everything to you.

So they should be banned because you "just don't like them", and lots of other people don't like them either. Fuck me. 😁 I don't like men wearing shorts, so GET THEM BANNED. I don't like any public religious displays, so ban Kippahs, ban Crucifixes, ban Turbans, etc.

Edited by Cheese

Just now, Cheese said:

So they should be banned because you "just don't like them", and lots of other people don't like them either. Fuck me. 😁 I don't like men wearing shorts, so GET THEM BANNED

It’s a Bit weird you going watching football if you don’t like men wearing shorts. 

7 minutes ago, Cheese said:

How is it a "literal barrier"? Are you deaf, therefore you need to lip read? Do you speak to every single person you meet when you're out and about?

Screenshot_20240615_070923_Chrome.thumb.jpg.ffbfef8aaaebc47526c0229c804cf444.jpg

Just now, Cheese said:

So they should be banned because you "just don't like them", and lots of other people don't like them either. Fuck me. 😁 I don't like men wearing shorts, so GET THEM BANNED

I've mentioned above why I don't like them.

Why don't you ask France and Denmark why they chose to ban them?

I've already said, they are oppressive, they are divisional, they make them even more secular than they already are and like I've said they just look fucking ridiculous.

If we had monks bowling about with their women covered with their eyes showing I'd say the same too.

There's a whole host of other religious practices I'd ban too and probably before the Burkahs.

Can you not handle anyone with thoughts different to you?

 

IMG_8790.jpeg

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.