Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, bwfc2003 said:

I think Howard makes it up as he goes along -

He's right on that.

We can't do admin.

It shit or bust

Posted
Just now, radcliffewhite1 said:

That definitely? Never knew that 

So EFL hold what’s called a ‘golden share’ in every football club. That means they have to agree to administration. 

Their terms are: 

100% settlement of football debts (fees owed to clubs etc) 

Minimum 25% made available to all other creditors. 

As the club has £16M in secured creditors these will get paid off first, meaning another £3-4M needs to be found to pay the 25% threshold to the other creditors, gives a total of £19-20M plus fees. 

Problem is that money has to be paid up front, same as in a pre-pack administration and Basran didn’t have it, even taking out the £5.5M to PBP....

Posted
3 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

So EFL hold what’s called a ‘golden share’ in every football club. That means they have to agree to administration. 

Their terms are: 

100% settlement of football debts (fees owed to clubs etc) 

Minimum 25% made available to all other creditors. 

As the club has £16M in secured creditors these will get paid off first, meaning another £3-4M needs to be found to pay the 25% threshold to the other creditors, gives a total of £19-20M plus fees. 

Problem is that money has to be paid up front, same as in a pre-pack administration and Basran didn’t have it, even taking out the £5.5M to PBP....

Thanks 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

So EFL hold what’s called a ‘golden share’ in every football club. That means they have to agree to administration. 

Their terms are: 

100% settlement of football debts (fees owed to clubs etc) 

Minimum 25% made available to all other creditors. 

As the club has £16M in secured creditors these will get paid off first, meaning another £3-4M needs to be found to pay the 25% threshold to the other creditors, gives a total of £19-20M plus fees. 

Problem is that money has to be paid up front, same as in a pre-pack administration and Basran didn’t have it, even taking out the £5.5M to PBP....

Are secured and football creditors one and the same?

Posted
4 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Come on down Peter Kenyon. Or someone.

Could this be the club's last game?

There is another bidder, always has been, just not through Ken.

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, onlyoneawalker said:

Are secured and football creditors one and the same?

No, but a secured creditor will always get paid first so they have to be paid in full before you can move on to the unsecured creditors, who are entitled to 25% under the EFL rules.

Edited by Howardroark
Change
Posted
14 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

Can’t go in to administration, costs £20M due to EFL rules, would be liquidation.

Liquidation bwfc does not exit any more how did Glasgow Rangers manage to keep there history ? Thought once you got liquidated the club no longer existed and had to be renamed like Darlington and Halifax or is there away round it ? 

Posted
Just now, Farnywhite said:

Liquidation bwfc does not exit any more how did Glasgow Rangers manage to keep there history ? Thought once you got liquidated the club no longer existed and had to be renamed like Darlington and Halifax or is there away round it ? 

Rangers FC ceased to exist.

The current incarnation is a new company entirely.

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Farnywhite said:

Liquidation bwfc does not exit any more how did Glasgow Rangers manage to keep there history ? Thought once you got liquidated the club no longer existed and had to be renamed like Darlington and Halifax or is there away round it ? 

The assets are purchased out of liquidation, name, stadium etc 

The owner of the assets would then apply to the league to join as a member. 

With Rangers the assets were purchased by Charles Green under a new company, but the SPL refused to allow membership, the SFL did however approve membership.

Also worth noting that Rangers were liquidated by HMRC who refused to allow them to escape via administration.

Edited by Howardroark
Addition
Posted
Just now, Howardroark said:

The assets are purchased out of liquidation, name, stadium etc 

The owner of the assets would then apply to the league to join as a member. 

With Rangers the assets were purchased by Charles Green but the SPL refused to allow membership, the SFL did however approve membership.

Also worth noting that Rangers were liquidated by HMRC who refused to allow the to escape via administration.

How much did they owe HRMC? 

Posted

THE public purse has still not received a penny of the £72 million owed to the taxman by the liquidated company which owned Rangers FC.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Howardroark said:

The assets are purchased out of liquidation, name, stadium etc 

The owner of the assets would then apply to the league to join as a member. 

With Rangers the assets were purchased by Charles Green under a new company, but the SPL refused to allow membership, the SFL did however approve membership.

Also worth noting that Rangers were liquidated by HMRC who refused to allow them to escape via administration.

The entry point in such circumstances is not the league......

Posted

Yes new company but I was told by  a rangers fan at work that they were still the most successful club in the world with title wins thought you lost everything if you had to reform  or is  he wrong ? 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.