GB News

[royal white]

22 minutes ago, Cheese said:

I'll give you a clue. It's not for his political beliefs.

Hardly narrows it down 

[Cheese]

1 minute ago, royal white said:

Hardly narrows it down 

It was only a clue. I'm sure you're capable of narrowing it down further.

[Tonge moor green jacket]

8 hours ago, Winchester White said:

You don't get your bank accounts closed and others refusing to let you open one for no reason. They don't care what your political persuasion is.

If it was only one case you may have a point. However it isnt: individuals and even a charity targeted. 

Of course it's easy for an mp to make accusations whilst hiding behind parliamentary privilege, but it is interesting that he didn't have the bollocks to say it in public when challenged.

Your local mp could accuse you of being a criminal in some way, if he or she so chose, and as long as it's done in the chamber, there is fuck all you can do. Fortunately, they seem to refrain from it normally.

Until investigations/arrests/convictions are achieved then there is nothing to show. They won't even explain why, so hardly suggests they have any evidence of something untoward that he could challenge or explain.

Piss easy to say these folk are up to no good becasue banks won't let them use their services, without any evidence to the contrary. Fortunately even his political enemies disagree with the approach, which is only likely to strengthen his support base.

[Cheese]

14 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

If it was only one case you may have a point. However it isnt: individuals and even a charity targeted. 

Of course it's easy for an mp to make accusations whilst hiding behind parliamentary privilege, but it is interesting that he didn't have the bollocks to say it in public when challenged.

Your local mp could accuse you of being a criminal in some way, if he or she so chose, and as long as it's done in the chamber, there is fuck all you can do. Fortunately, they seem to refrain from it normally.

Until investigations/arrests/convictions are achieved then there is nothing to show. They won't even explain why, so hardly suggests they have any evidence of something untoward that he could challenge or explain.

Piss easy to say these folk are up to no good becasue banks won't let them use their services, without any evidence to the contrary. Fortunately even his political enemies disagree with the approach, which is only likely to strengthen his support base.

You don't genuinely believe the banks are punishing him for his Right Wing/Brexit rhetoric, do you?

[Casino]

35 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

If it was only one case you may have a point. However it isnt: individuals and even a charity targeted. 

Of course it's easy for an mp to make accusations whilst hiding behind parliamentary privilege, but it is interesting that he didn't have the bollocks to say it in public when challenged.

Your local mp could accuse you of being a criminal in some way, if he or she so chose, and as long as it's done in the chamber, there is fuck all you can do. Fortunately, they seem to refrain from it normally.

Until investigations/arrests/convictions are achieved then there is nothing to show. They won't even explain why, so hardly suggests they have any evidence of something untoward that he could challenge or explain.

Piss easy to say these folk are up to no good becasue banks won't let them use their services, without any evidence to the contrary. Fortunately even his political enemies disagree with the approach, which is only likely to strengthen his support base.

Im sure @Aniwho actually knows what hes talking about covered this

Im fairly sure itd be unethical for a bank to go public on its reasons

Im equally sure farridge knows the reasons

And its not that hes an absolute cunt

[Cheese]

"Typical fucking Lefty woke banks!"

Hahahaha

[Tonge moor green jacket]

1 hour ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

If it was only one case you may have a point. However it isnt: individuals and even a charity targeted. 

Of course it's easy for an mp to make accusations whilst hiding behind parliamentary privilege, but it is interesting that he didn't have the bollocks to say it in public when challenged.

Your local mp could accuse you of being a criminal in some way, if he or she so chose, and as long as it's done in the chamber, there is fuck all you can do. Fortunately, they seem to refrain from it normally.

Until investigations/arrests/convictions are achieved then there is nothing to show. They won't even explain why, so hardly suggests they have any evidence of something untoward that he could challenge or explain.

Piss easy to say these folk are up to no good becasue banks won't let them use their services, without any evidence to the contrary. Fortunately even his political enemies disagree with the approach, which is only likely to strengthen his support base.

Richard Fothergill the latest. 

[Ani]

16 minutes ago, Casino said:

Im sure @Aniwho actually knows what hes talking about covered this

Im fairly sure itd be unethical for a bank to go public on its reasons

Im equally sure farridge knows the reasons

And its not that hes an absolute cunt

You are right the bank will not be able to comment. 
I read a very good point on this on Twitter today from a Farage supporter. Basically having made the allegations why is Farage not naming the bank ? The suggestion is that it is Coutts , hardly the home of the lefties ! Farage won't say who it is as after banking with them for 40 years it hardly goes with his man of the people image.

He could come out and give the bank permission to give their reasons for the decision. There has been months of debate with the bank, again he could publish this. He also has been rejected by a number of other banks . I assume this is the left wing banking establishment Liz Truss warned us about. 
 

The most likely reason (and there will be a reason) for closing the accounts is that money has been paid in from unexplained sources overseas. That is not to say criminals but if the source is not clear and the account holder can not explain it the account will be closed. 
 

One other thing that Farage did not mention this is not something that happens overnight, you are given a period of time to make alternative arrangements. 
 

I have posted that the City of London is the money laundering capital of the world. One the things the EU were driving were tighter banking controls. The fact we are implementing controls and Farage is caught by that is as ironic as it gets.

The first rule is to 'follow' the money which is why earlier in the week I was questioning 'who' and 'why' someone is funding £30m to run GBNews ? Same applies to Farage. 

[Casino]

2 hours ago, Ani said:

You are right the bank will not be able to comment. 
I read a very good point on this on Twitter today from a Farage supporter. Basically having made the allegations why is Farage not naming the bank ? The suggestion is that it is Coutts , hardly the home of the lefties ! Farage won't say who it is as after banking with them for 40 years it hardly goes with his man of the people image.

He could come out and give the bank permission to give their reasons for the decision. There has been months of debate with the bank, again he could publish this. He also has been rejected by a number of other banks . I assume this is the left wing banking establishment Liz Truss warned us about. 
 

The most likely reason (and there will be a reason) for closing the accounts is that money has been paid in from unexplained sources overseas. That is not to say criminals but if the source is not clear and the account holder can not explain it the account will be closed. 
 

One other thing that Farage did not mention this is not something that happens overnight, you are given a period of time to make alternative arrangements. 
 

I have posted that the City of London is the money laundering capital of the world. One the things the EU were driving were tighter banking controls. The fact we are implementing controls and Farage is caught by that is as ironic as it gets.

The first rule is to 'follow' the money which is why earlier in the week I was questioning 'who' and 'why' someone is funding £30m to run GBNews ? Same applies to Farage. 

Yeah, yeah

What about all the wiff waffing above though

Its almost like youre saying it was a load of ill informed bollocks

I wouldnt mind but its not like you hadnt already taken the time to explain things

[Ani]

1 hour ago, Casino said:

Yeah, yeah

What about all the wiff waffing above though

Its almost like youre saying it was a load of ill informed bollocks

I wouldnt mind but its not like you hadnt already taken the time to explain things

To be clear only 2 parties have full access to what has gone on. The bank who can not disclose and Farage who can. At this point he has chosen not to. He has no obligation to, but he publicised it so why not ? 
 

He could be waiting for the right moment or there is more to it, if his accounts have been closed because someone does not like his views it is crazy, when the fuck did bankers claim to have morals ? Previously he avoided questions on the £450k Aarron Brooks said he gave him in a year. Maybe he has been told to go quiet by others who fund him but do not want a light shined on them, who knows. 
 

There so many different options what might have happened but shutting an account just cos you do not like someone who has been a customer for 40 years would be a long way down the list. The claim it is revenge for Brexit is really saying Brexit has been a fuck up is nt it ? Which is a strange thing for him to claim. 

Edited July 1, 2023 by Ani

[bolty58]

14 hours ago, Sweep said:

No way, no way at all. 

 He is rather obsessed isn't he? 

[bolty58]

14 hours ago, Sweep said:

You don't sit there with a trifle and a towel and pretend you're a proud Brit, if you're actually citizen of another country

Hahahaha.............keep trying matey. Not biting.

[bolty58]

8 hours ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

If it was only one case you may have a point. However it isnt: individuals and even a charity targeted. 

Of course it's easy for an mp to make accusations whilst hiding behind parliamentary privilege, but it is interesting that he didn't have the bollocks to say it in public when challenged.

Your local mp could accuse you of being a criminal in some way, if he or she so chose, and as long as it's done in the chamber, there is fuck all you can do. Fortunately, they seem to refrain from it normally.

Until investigations/arrests/convictions are achieved then there is nothing to show. They won't even explain why, so hardly suggests they have any evidence of something untoward that he could challenge or explain.

Piss easy to say these folk are up to no good becasue banks won't let them use their services, without any evidence to the contrary. Fortunately even his political enemies disagree with the approach, which is only likely to strengthen his support base.

Aye. Toby Young cancelled by Paypal. It's a growing trend.

[bolty58]

10 hours ago, Sweep said:

Nope

How many WWays regulars live in places other than Bolton? Only one apparently 

[mickbrown]

 🦘🌏 

[Spider]

7 hours ago, bolty58 said:

How many WWays regulars live in places other than Bolton? Only one apparently 

The Doublethink is strong in this one 

[Sweep]

17 hours ago, Ani said:

You are right the bank will not be able to comment. 
I read a very good point on this on Twitter today from a Farage supporter. Basically having made the allegations why is Farage not naming the bank ? The suggestion is that it is Coutts , hardly the home of the lefties ! Farage won't say who it is as after banking with them for 40 years it hardly goes with his man of the people image.

He could come out and give the bank permission to give their reasons for the decision. There has been months of debate with the bank, again he could publish this. He also has been rejected by a number of other banks . I assume this is the left wing banking establishment Liz Truss warned us about. 
 

The most likely reason (and there will be a reason) for closing the accounts is that money has been paid in from unexplained sources overseas. That is not to say criminals but if the source is not clear and the account holder can not explain it the account will be closed. 
 

One other thing that Farage did not mention this is not something that happens overnight, you are given a period of time to make alternative arrangements. 
 

I have posted that the City of London is the money laundering capital of the world. One the things the EU were driving were tighter banking controls. The fact we are implementing controls and Farage is caught by that is as ironic as it gets.

The first rule is to 'follow' the money which is why earlier in the week I was questioning 'who' and 'why' someone is funding £30m to run GBNews ? Same applies to Farage. 

I'd not be hugely surprised if its all bollocks, and he hasn't had his bank account closed. He loves the attention. 

[Winchester White]

Farage whining on twitter that 9 banks have refused to let him open an account.

So that means 9 separate banks have received an application, done the necessary background checks and all have flagged issues.

I am not sure this is the hot take he thinks it is.

[Casino]

19 minutes ago, Winchester White said:

Farage whining on twitter that 9 banks have refused to let him open an account.

So that means 9 separate banks have received an application, done the necessary background checks and all have flagged issues.

I am not sure this is the hot take he thinks it is.

So, youre not going to contribute to his legal costs?

[Winchester White]

36 minutes ago, Casino said:

So, youre not going to contribute to his legal costs?

No.

 

[mickbrown]

Farage was full of shit then. Who'd have thought it

 

[Sweep]

33 minutes ago, mickbrown said:

Farage was full of shit then. Who'd have thought it

 

As soon as he wouldn't name the bank, you just knew there was more to it than him just having his account closed. Still, it got the Gammons frothing for a few minutes. 

[Winchester White]

1 hour ago, Sweep said:

As soon as he wouldn't name the bank, you just knew there was more to it than him just having his account closed. Still, it got the Gammons frothing for a few minutes. 

There's some grifters looking very silly that took Farage at his word.

[Casino]

1 hour ago, Winchester White said:

There's some grifters looking very silly that took Farage at his word.

4 takes wooton will be full on meghan bashing, tonight

the uber cunt

[Spider]

Farage has decided the best thing to do today is cower behind war graves, the absolute shithousing, shameless piece of shit