Gonk Posted January 27 Posted January 27 3 hours ago, gonzo said: 8 pints deep in the giddy goose singing we've got super Ian Evatt in to his pint? Cracking home made steak pie & chips Quote
Whitesince63 Posted January 28 Posted January 28 14 hours ago, Matt Lofthouse said: Actually fuck that we’re having 2nd. Not with 14 points to make up we’re not. Quote
Matt Lofthouse Posted January 28 Posted January 28 Big ask I know. 19 games left with 7 of the 8 above us to play. Quote
gonzo Posted January 28 Posted January 28 57 minutes ago, Whitesince63 said: Not with 14 points to make up we’re not. Aye it's a big ask that. Humongous in fact. We needed 1 defeat in 18 matches in 1993 to get runners up. Quote
Johnnyrotten Posted January 28 Posted January 28 1 hour ago, Whitesince63 said: Not with 14 points to make up we’re not. Agreed. If they'd done the right thing and at least got rid after Wigan (how was there any doubt at all by then?), we'd be a lot closer than 14 points off 2nd. Quote
Site Supporter FrancisFogarty Posted January 28 Site Supporter Posted January 28 7 hours ago, Matt Lofthouse said: Big ask I know. 19 games left with 7 of the 8 above us to play. Six pointers every one then. Quote
Greg_BWFC Posted January 28 Posted January 28 Think we need 12 or 13 wins just to get playoffs, bloody tall order tbh. Quote
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted January 28 Site Supporter Posted January 28 42 minutes ago, Greg_BWFC said: Think we need 12 or 13 wins just to get playoffs, bloody tall order tbh. I think that goes out of the window this season. Plenty of teams around and about, and previous seasons may not reflect this. Could be true of course, but we only have to get more points than 7th. Do that, and be playing well, and who knows. Quote
Members Lt. Aldo Raine Posted January 28 Members Posted January 28 37 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: I think that goes out of the window this season. Plenty of teams around and about, and previous seasons may not reflect this. Could be true of course, but we only have to get more points than 7th. Do that, and be playing well, and who knows. I can't be arsed spending the time working it out but it'd be interesting to know the points average from previous years for the play-offs at the stage of the season and see if there's any difference in comparison this season Quote
gonzo Posted January 28 Posted January 28 24 minutes ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said: I can't be arsed spending the time working it out but it'd be interesting to know the points average from previous years for the play-offs at the stage of the season and see if there's any difference in comparison this season I just attempted it on 11v11 league table generator but you can't see the points total on a singular screenshot. So I've given up. We just need to win more than those above us Quote
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted January 28 Site Supporter Posted January 28 17 minutes ago, Dimron said: And make inroads on our terrible goal difference We don't really. One more point than 7th. Worry about GD later, when games start to run out. Quote
Dimron Posted January 28 Posted January 28 Leagues tend to stack up in order of GD in the final reckoning We need a couple of 4 nils to balance those defeats we have suffered Quote
jayjayoghani Posted January 28 Posted January 28 Think we once got in the playoffs with 69 pts, Neal era. Played Notts County, 87 pts I think. We got battered. Quote
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted January 28 Site Supporter Posted January 28 2 minutes ago, jayjayoghani said: Think we once got in the playoffs with 69 pts, Neal era. Played Notts County, 87 pts I think. We got battered. A new man would have to get the team playing better, and consistently, gaining more points. Top two is pretty much gone, so just get in there, take some form in, and who knows. Quote
Site Supporter desperado Posted February 17 Author Site Supporter Posted February 17 (edited) Scapegoat number 1 found himself a job 😂. Hope he doesn’t Craddock it up. I’ll be watching his corner routines at Waterford with interest Edited February 17 by desperado Quote
Whitesince63 Posted February 17 Posted February 17 35 minutes ago, desperado said: Scapegoat number 1 found himself a job 😂. Hope he doesn’t Craddock it up. I’ll be watching his corner routines at Waterford with interest Good luck to Matt in his new job, he seemed to be unfairly treated here. Quote
wakey Posted February 17 Posted February 17 3 hours ago, desperado said: Scapegoat number 1 found himself a job 😂. Hope he doesn’t Craddock it up. I’ll be watching his corner routines at Waterford with interest he leaves 6 on the half way line Quote
thebells Posted February 17 Posted February 17 Craddock was moved on in the aftermath of the Huddersfield defeat and the timing made it look like that was the reason. It wasn’t. His loss of employment wasn’t related in anyway to the first team results, but due to an incident that took place (I believe during an international weekend) I’m reluctant to say any more, but from what i know I think it was the right decision at the time. Quote
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted February 17 Site Supporter Posted February 17 Was he found working on defending crosses? Quote
Wullie Posted February 17 Posted February 17 he was caught destroying the table tennis equipment Quote
thebells Posted February 17 Posted February 17 55 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: Was he found working on defending crosses? If only. But apparently what goes on in Ibiza doesn’t always stay in Ibiza. Quote
tomski Posted February 17 Posted February 17 1 hour ago, thebells said: Craddock was moved on in the aftermath of the Huddersfield defeat and the timing made it look like that was the reason. It wasn’t. His loss of employment wasn’t related in anyway to the first team results, but due to an incident that took place (I believe during an international weekend) I’m reluctant to say any more, but from what i know I think it was the right decision at the time. What did the analyst do? Were they in cahoots Quote
Big E Posted February 17 Posted February 17 1 hour ago, thebells said: Craddock was moved on in the aftermath of the Huddersfield defeat and the timing made it look like that was the reason. It wasn’t. His loss of employment wasn’t related in anyway to the first team results, but due to an incident that took place (I believe during an international weekend) I’m reluctant to say any more, but from what i know I think it was the right decision at the time. Does this tie in with Coleman issues Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.