Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Recommended Posts

Posted

There's potential there - he's had a few decent games. His distribution lets him down a huge amount.

 

Sending him back to City to make way for another loan signing will be the best option as we haven't got time for players just with potential.

 

Thanks for reading,

 

Gloria.

Posted

There's potential there - he's had a few decent games. His distribution lets him down a huge amount.

 

Sending him back to City to make way for another loan signing will be the best option as we haven't got time for players just with potential.

 

Thanks for reading,

 

Gloria.

Are you still here?

Posted

only cos i've not worked out to ban him on this new board

 

On what grounds do you intend to ban me?

 

I haven't posted in an aggressive nature. I have 18 posts to my name and cursed just once. I've badmouthed one person who doesn't post on here, gives as good as she gets and wouldn't take it seriously anyway. There are nastier souls you could ban but there wouldn't be many posters left.

 

Thanks for reading,

 

Gloria.

Posted

There's potential there - he's had a few decent games. His distribution lets him down a huge amount.

 

Sending him back to City to make way for another loan signing will be the best option as we haven't got time for players just with

 

But that's what he is - a player with potential. Because if he's the finished article then he better get ready for the lower leagues cos he's just been found out. His distribution isn't bad it's non existent & that's not good enough even for us. Send him back in Jan & play Steinsson, Ricketts, Riley or any other fucker there instead.

Posted

very constructive, & best..... not cryptic, straight to point & in my eyes right, though I think we should fill our arguements out a bit. I'll start with

 

, he's not a right back

 

, he couldn't give a SHIT about us one way or the other 'cos he already thinks he's 'Cities' future ::lol:: ::lol::

 

silly young man ::lol:: ::lol:: ::lol::

Posted

On what grounds do you intend to ban me?

 

I haven't posted in an aggressive nature. I have 18 posts to my name and cursed just once. I've badmouthed one person who doesn't post on here, gives as good as she gets and wouldn't take it seriously anyway. There are nastier souls you could ban but there wouldn't be many posters left.

 

Thanks for reading,

 

Gloria.

 

I'd imagine you being on a constant wind up with your "Thanks for reading" shite. The mods may look upon your demise as a favour to the masses.

 

As I see it, Ww is the number one Bolton forum because the management don't suffer fools. You are a fool, thus you may not be suffered.

 

Thanks for fuck all.

Posted

 

 

I'd imagine you being on a constant wind up with your "Thanks for reading" shite. The mods may look upon your demise as a favour to the masses.

 

As I see it, Ww is the number one Bolton forum because the management don't suffer fools. You are a fool, thus you may not be suffered.

 

Thanks for fuck all.

 

To be fair

 

She's wound Bowton up in no time at all, which I think says more about him than her.

 

Know what I mean?

Posted

Boyatta has got about as much potential as my left bollock. Hes fucking shit, his cant even pass the ball 5 yards the useless twat. Steinsson pissed up is better than that cunt.

Posted

As I see it, Ww is the number one Bolton forum because the management don't suffer fools. You are a fool, thus you may not be suffered.

 

That would be a shame. Its been non-stop intellectual BWFC-related debate with everybody since I registered.

 

Its hilarious that you call this a forum that doesn't suffer fools and you've got a moderator that doesn't even know how to ban people. Its probably just as well as he hasn't got a clue how to handle it. He intends to ban me despite being unable to give an example of a red-cardable offence I've committed apart from putting "Thanks for reading" at the end of each post, which has somehow had people seething. But if my head has to roll for the other posters' personality bypass, so be it.

 

Thanks for reading,

 

Gloria.

Posted

That would be a shame. Its been non-stop intellectual BWFC-related debate with everybody since I registered.

Utter Bullshit

 

Its hilarious that you call this a forum that doesn't suffer fools and you've got a moderator that doesn't even know how to ban people. Its probably just as well as he hasn't got a clue how to handle it. He intends to ban me despite being unable to give an example of a red-cardable offence I've committed apart from putting "Thanks for reading" at the end of each post, which has somehow had people seething. But if my head has to roll for the other posters' personality bypass, so be it.

I'd say he was taking the piss. He certainly will know how to ban people.

 

Thanks for reading,: THIS is fucking tedious, give it a rest.

 

Gloria.

 

You'd endear yourself more if you weren't so dull.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.