Accidentally deleted it so carry on...

If we went with 352 then I doubt McNaughton would start unless he was the right side of the 3

Who you thinking then big balls?

 

Hall and lee? Moxey?

Mason would be better at the side of Craig Davies than Beckford. JSL

Mason would be better at the side of Craig Davies than Beckford. JSL

Agreed.

With McNaugton as over lapping full back?

 

I've seen milk turn quicker.

Feeney would be the man on the right flank I reckon.

Edited July 31, 201411 yr by tylswhite

Feeney played something approaching right wing back last night and seem to remember it was something similar at Rochdale?

Who you thinking then big balls?

 

Hall and lee? Moxey?

 

Lonners

 

Wheater Mills Ream

 

Feeney, Medo, Spearing, Moxey

 

Mavies

 

Mason Beckford

 

Lonners

 

Wheater Mills Ream

 

Feeney, Medo, Spearing, Moxey

 

Mavies

 

Mason Beckford

 

Looking at that setup makes me a little more optimistic.

Shouldn't of sowd goggle eyes for £500k

We have not signed McNaughton to leave him out of the team

 

I've seen nothing so far to suggest freedman shares my view that Lee is a waste of space so hell play too

 

4 4 1 1 most weeks

Nailed on

Shouldn't of sowd goggle eyes for £500k

Even if it funded 3 lads who want to play for 10k a week?

We have not signed McNaughton to leave him out of the team

 

I've seen nothing so far to suggest freedman shares my view that Lee is a waste of space so hell play too

 

4 4 1 1 most weeks

Nailed on

I think you're bang on. Expect to see a lot more 0-0 0-1 1-0 or even the occasional exciting 2-1.

We have not signed McNaughton to leave him out of the team

 

I've seen nothing so far to suggest freedman shares my view that Lee is a waste of space so hell play too

 

4 4 1 1 most weeks

Nailed on

Aye spot on.

 

Although I like Danny's team,this is Douglas '1-0' freedman we are talking about.

Even if it funded 3 lads who want to play for 10k a week?

Except that it hasn't.

 

Given we still have to pay Watford 1M this year & we only got 500K for him, that still leaves us 500K in the red.

Steve Morrison Millwall

Steve Morrison Millwall

Handful always liked him not sure if he's lost his way a bit. Where did you get info from?

Handful always liked him not sure if he's lost his way a bit. Where did you get info from?

Just came to me as a possibility right profile not sure he's right age

Except that it hasn't.

Given we still have to pay Watford 1M this year & we only got 500K for him, that still leaves us 500K in the red.

Not an accountant are you?

Selling him for 500k and clearing his wage leaves us with 1.5 million in the budget, does it not?

Not an accountant are you?

Selling him for 500k and clearing his wage leaves us with 1.5 million in the budget, does it not?

Ah! Now I knew you'd mention wages.

 

I didn't mention wages as I'm not privy to that information.

 

Tell me, how does that work? When we tried to buy Beckford there was a hold up over payments due to him from Leicester. Did we have payments due to Sordell? Have Burnley matched his wages?

 

Even if we have 1.5M back in the budget, a Million still needs to go to Watford. So using your basic theory, only 500k is actually available at most.

 

That won't cover your 3 players at 10k a week will it? You don't have to be an accountant to work that one out

Ah! Now I knew you'd mention wages.

 

I didn't mention wages as I'm not privy to that information.

 

Tell me, how does that work? When we tried to buy Beckford there was a hold up over payments due to him from Leicester. Did we have payments due to Sordell? Have Burnley matched his wages?

 

Even if we have 1.5M back in the budget, a Million still needs to go to Watford. So using your basic theory, only 500k is actually available at most.

 

That won't cover your 3 players at 10k a week will it? You don't have to be an accountant to work that one out

 

 

500k transfer fee plus a big signing on fee which effectively covered the difference in wages between us and them

Ah! Now I knew you'd mention wages.

 

I didn't mention wages as I'm not privy to that information.

 

Tell me, how does that work? When we tried to buy Beckford there was a hold up over payments due to him from Leicester. Did we have payments due to Sordell? Have Burnley matched his wages?

 

Even if we have 1.5M back in the budget, a Million still needs to go to Watford. So using your basic theory, only 500k is actually available at most.

 

That won't cover your 3 players at 10k a week will it? You don't have to be an accountant to work that one out

That would be true only if we had to pay the £1m if we sold him.

As we had to pay the £1m to watford, whether we sold him or not, that is a sunk cost.

We have cleared <sellingprice> + <wages> from our budget.

That would be true only if we had to pay the £1m if we sold him.

As we had to pay the £1m to watford, whether we sold him or not, that is a sunk cost.

We have cleared <sellingprice> + <wages> from our budget.

But in terms of cash flow it is still a payment to make. Won't affect FFP in P&L terms for this year I doubt as most of depreciation probably accounted for, but I doubt we are cash rich for paying any fees up front which reportedly some of the Juke fee is.

We have not signed McNaughton to leave him out of the team

 

wouldn't jump to conclusions just yet

Guiddetti on loan itk ( this is just a guess I really have no itk info. Just thought I would throw a name in seeing as others are).

Southampton say Billy Sharp is available on a free

Southampton say Billy Sharp is available on a free

I'd take him. Proven goalscorer at this level. He'd probably demand fairly high wages though