Danny G Posted July 31, 2014 Posted July 31, 2014 With McNaugton as over lapping full back? I've seen milk turn quicker. If we went with 352 then I doubt McNaughton would start unless he was the right side of the 3 Quote
gonzo Posted July 31, 2014 Posted July 31, 2014 If we went with 352 then I doubt McNaughton would start unless he was the right side of the 3 Who you thinking then big balls? Hall and lee? Moxey? Quote
Ratwhite Posted July 31, 2014 Posted July 31, 2014 Mason would be better at the side of Craig Davies than Beckford. JSL Quote
gonzo Posted July 31, 2014 Posted July 31, 2014 Mason would be better at the side of Craig Davies than Beckford. JSL Agreed. Quote
tylswhite Posted July 31, 2014 Posted July 31, 2014 (edited) With McNaugton as over lapping full back? I've seen milk turn quicker. Feeney would be the man on the right flank I reckon. Edited July 31, 2014 by tylswhite Quote
Leyther_Matt Posted July 31, 2014 Posted July 31, 2014 Feeney played something approaching right wing back last night and seem to remember it was something similar at Rochdale? Quote
Danny G Posted July 31, 2014 Posted July 31, 2014 Who you thinking then big balls? Hall and lee? Moxey? Lonners Wheater Mills Ream Feeney, Medo, Spearing, Moxey Mavies Mason Beckford Quote
tylswhite Posted July 31, 2014 Posted July 31, 2014 Lonners Wheater Mills Ream Feeney, Medo, Spearing, Moxey Mavies Mason Beckford Looking at that setup makes me a little more optimistic. Quote
Casino Posted July 31, 2014 Posted July 31, 2014 We have not signed McNaughton to leave him out of the team I've seen nothing so far to suggest freedman shares my view that Lee is a waste of space so hell play too 4 4 1 1 most weeks Nailed on Quote
Casino Posted July 31, 2014 Posted July 31, 2014 Shouldn't of sowd goggle eyes for £500k Even if it funded 3 lads who want to play for 10k a week? Quote
kent_white Posted July 31, 2014 Posted July 31, 2014 We have not signed McNaughton to leave him out of the team I've seen nothing so far to suggest freedman shares my view that Lee is a waste of space so hell play too 4 4 1 1 most weeks Nailed on I think you're bang on. Expect to see a lot more 0-0 0-1 1-0 or even the occasional exciting 2-1. Quote
gonzo Posted July 31, 2014 Posted July 31, 2014 We have not signed McNaughton to leave him out of the team I've seen nothing so far to suggest freedman shares my view that Lee is a waste of space so hell play too 4 4 1 1 most weeks Nailed on Aye spot on. Although I like Danny's team,this is Douglas '1-0' freedman we are talking about. Quote
BOWTUN BAKED Posted July 31, 2014 Posted July 31, 2014 Even if it funded 3 lads who want to play for 10k a week? Except that it hasn't. Given we still have to pay Watford 1M this year & we only got 500K for him, that still leaves us 500K in the red. Quote
Mounts Kipper Posted July 31, 2014 Posted July 31, 2014 Steve Morrison Millwall Handful always liked him not sure if he's lost his way a bit. Where did you get info from? Quote
onlyoneawalker Posted July 31, 2014 Posted July 31, 2014 Handful always liked him not sure if he's lost his way a bit. Where did you get info from? Just came to me as a possibility right profile not sure he's right age Quote
Casino Posted July 31, 2014 Posted July 31, 2014 Except that it hasn't. Given we still have to pay Watford 1M this year & we only got 500K for him, that still leaves us 500K in the red. Not an accountant are you? Selling him for 500k and clearing his wage leaves us with 1.5 million in the budget, does it not? Quote
BOWTUN BAKED Posted August 1, 2014 Posted August 1, 2014 Not an accountant are you? Selling him for 500k and clearing his wage leaves us with 1.5 million in the budget, does it not? Ah! Now I knew you'd mention wages. I didn't mention wages as I'm not privy to that information. Tell me, how does that work? When we tried to buy Beckford there was a hold up over payments due to him from Leicester. Did we have payments due to Sordell? Have Burnley matched his wages? Even if we have 1.5M back in the budget, a Million still needs to go to Watford. So using your basic theory, only 500k is actually available at most. That won't cover your 3 players at 10k a week will it? You don't have to be an accountant to work that one out Quote
Danny G Posted August 1, 2014 Posted August 1, 2014 Ah! Now I knew you'd mention wages. I didn't mention wages as I'm not privy to that information. Tell me, how does that work? When we tried to buy Beckford there was a hold up over payments due to him from Leicester. Did we have payments due to Sordell? Have Burnley matched his wages? Even if we have 1.5M back in the budget, a Million still needs to go to Watford. So using your basic theory, only 500k is actually available at most. That won't cover your 3 players at 10k a week will it? You don't have to be an accountant to work that one out 500k transfer fee plus a big signing on fee which effectively covered the difference in wages between us and them Quote
ZiggyStardust Posted August 1, 2014 Posted August 1, 2014 Ah! Now I knew you'd mention wages. I didn't mention wages as I'm not privy to that information. Tell me, how does that work? When we tried to buy Beckford there was a hold up over payments due to him from Leicester. Did we have payments due to Sordell? Have Burnley matched his wages? Even if we have 1.5M back in the budget, a Million still needs to go to Watford. So using your basic theory, only 500k is actually available at most. That won't cover your 3 players at 10k a week will it? You don't have to be an accountant to work that one out That would be true only if we had to pay the £1m if we sold him. As we had to pay the £1m to watford, whether we sold him or not, that is a sunk cost. We have cleared <sellingprice> + <wages> from our budget. Quote
ex_midlandwhite Posted August 1, 2014 Posted August 1, 2014 That would be true only if we had to pay the £1m if we sold him. As we had to pay the £1m to watford, whether we sold him or not, that is a sunk cost. We have cleared <sellingprice> + <wages> from our budget. But in terms of cash flow it is still a payment to make. Won't affect FFP in P&L terms for this year I doubt as most of depreciation probably accounted for, but I doubt we are cash rich for paying any fees up front which reportedly some of the Juke fee is. Quote
Zico Posted August 1, 2014 Posted August 1, 2014 We have not signed McNaughton to leave him out of the team wouldn't jump to conclusions just yet Quote
maje Posted August 1, 2014 Posted August 1, 2014 Guiddetti on loan itk ( this is just a guess I really have no itk info. Just thought I would throw a name in seeing as others are). Quote
ex_midlandwhite Posted August 1, 2014 Posted August 1, 2014 Southampton say Billy Sharp is available on a free Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.