is that it now game over no chance of POTUS

 

Rayguns out

No looking good for the Don...

Yeah, but,Clinton, no, but, clinton

Casino, but also don't forget Obama oh and just in case throw Bill Clinton in too , that cover most of all the GOP deflections

The net is closing in

This is why Trump never wanted this, Meuller as free reigned to go wherever ANY evidence takes him. Even though this as nothing to do with Trump on the outside, this guy may just know where any skeleton's are hidden and they now have leverage to make him talk.

But the trouble is if the VP takes over he is not a full shilling.

You are right Malc, but he's not a loose canon like this idiot

Yeah, but,Clinton, no, but, clinton

I'm about to finish her book - I'm not sure why she chose to write it, its not exactly overflowing with the cup of human warmth - I'm not sure empathy is her thing. 

 

Even one of things cited - the Russian interference, the aggressive targeting of Wikileaks and the really odd timings of the CIA announcement of looking further into the emails, and then clearing them only a few days later - one have been strange, for it all to happen, for Facebook to admit Russian backed news feeds being served to 126 million Americans shows something is rotten in the state of Denmark, whomever you chose to believe.

 

When she spoke at the Southbank, she clearly called out Russian involvement stating that its absolutely the case, and that Obama knew but couldn't say anything for fear of being partisan. She was discussing that this is the new cold war and that governments such as Latvia has been warning the major western powers about the cyber war that Putin is waging - and Estonia has been shouting about this since 2007. 

 

As Clive Humby said in 2006, data is the new oil, the Russian's have been the first to weaponise the resource and western governments have been caught cold with it. As I said, whatever your political allegiances, if any candidate was privy to what was occurring, or any of their advisors, to use it to their advantage, its fundamentally indefensible that any foreign state can aid in the election of another's government.

We work in data, essentially, with the US government. Not sure about weaponising it but we are looking at capturing, storing and being able to index anything. Well more like everything. I'm not sure that that's what the Russians have done, they've just used basic manipulation techniques, as people on Facebook are generally numb as fuck.

They've done a bit more than that, and clever or not (there was over 2 billion active users on Facebook in the second quarter of 2017, I'm not sure if they are all idiots) manipulating social platforms - and illegally tying and layering of separate data sources together for individual targeting - for the endgame of influencing the result of a foreign state's elections is a serious issue and therefore, they've turned there's platforms and the data we willingingly give us into a weapon against democratic processes beyond their boarders.

 

The fact the now President might have been aware of this is hugely troubling for the world.

 

Same in the counties I mentioned above.

 

On top of this the fact at Wikileaks is also being used not as a tool of open source information but used against competing political views - again to tip the balance one way or another - is illegal and worrying.

 

Not sure what you are looking at but Cambridge Analytica lead the world in this area and they are funnily enough funded by some very questionable ultra-conservative folk. Some of the work Havas have done is excellent. Big Data can be wonderfully powerful, but how we are suing it, and to what ends without the public really  being aware - we talk ope source, but I'm not sure everyone really has an idea, or else cares (just keep looking at the Kitten gifs foks...). Even the changes from Data Protection to GDPR next May. Until the public are really aware of how the details they willing give is being used, it will always be open to this sort of abuse.

 

Facebook is a social data storage platform for targeting, all big data companies need to work out and be open with what their mission is. Its vitalso everyone knows what control they have.

IBM are miles ahead of anyone else, miles.

Aye, amazing stuff.

 

I think CA have used their darker arts better for outcomes.

4 part documentary starts on Ch4 on Thursday (9pm) - "Trump: An American Dream".

Part One covers his rise in New York society through the 70s and 80s.

Telegraph comment - "Fascinating and horrifying in equal measure."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-us-canada-41851273/trump-voters-speak-out-a-year-after-the-us-election

Watching first part of this c4 documentary bout him

 

His dad looks like a classic movie villain

Just been out with the dogs and met a bloke with a colly. Got chatting as you do.

 

After ten minutes he'd become more extreme and a conspiracist. Barack Obama is gay, Michelle is actually Michael, and the kids aren't theirs.

 

I've been enlightened.

Didn't you know? Joan Rivers was assassinated by Secret Service goons, loyal to the Obamas, after she got wind of Michael's tranny status...

It would seem May agrees with Clinton.

 

But yeah but May is ace, but Clinton is a liar, but May ???? but Clinton ???? but Tories ???? but Democrats ????

Edited November 14, 20178 yr by Not in Crawley

Reversing the ban on hunt trophies entering the US?

 

Fucking why?

Reversing the ban on hunt trophies entering the US?

 

Fucking why?

Even though elephants are listed as endangered under the Endangered Species Act, a provision in the act allows the government to give permits to import such trophies if there is evidence that the hunting benefits conservation for that species. The official said the administration has new information from officials in Zimbabwe and Zambia to support reversing the ban.

Basically a lot of Americans will now be happy they can go and shoot something and bring it back if they want, even though most won't

 

Right to bear arms and all that

Reversing the ban on hunt trophies entering the US?

 

Fucking why?

Because Americans are ridiculous people

because his sons love big game hunting, Google it

Really don't think I want to, I need an early night

What a complete and utter fucktard.