is that it now game over no chance of POTUS

 

Rayguns out

They don't fuck about with damages figures over there, do they?

10 hours ago, Carlos said:

I don't think anyone gives a fuck about what's happening over there atm, what with our country being in the worst state in my lifetime and all.

You are clearly much younger than me. 1973 was the worst state in my lifetime - by a country mile.

On the plus side, we had Jimmy Armfield and a fine football team.

9 hours ago, royal white said:

🤞🤞

Yes sir, the amusement factor would be enormous. The wringing of hands and unfettered anguish from the Hollywood elite and the New York reds would be delightful.

7 hours ago, royal white said:

It’s almost like you’re a visionary 😂

One must try 

11 hours ago, bolty58 said:

Watched the documentary on BBC2 last night about him running again in 2024.

Better get ready for some giant meltdowns on here if the unthinkable was to happen.

You know you can not trust the BBC. 

5 hours ago, bolty58 said:

You are clearly much younger than me. 1973 was the worst state in my lifetime - by a country mile.

On the plus side, we had Jimmy Armfield and a fine football team.

1973, after 3 years of Conservative leadership?  Surely not?

 

9 hours ago, Spider said:

His supporters are NOT pig thick, swivel-eyed racists and conspiracy theorists and gun nonces. Be kind

Not all of his supporters are pig thick, swivel-eyed racists and conspiracy theorists and gun nonces but all pig thick, swivel-eyed racists and conspiracy theorists and gun nonces support him. 

2 hours ago, CambridgeBWFC said:

1973, after 3 years of Conservative leadership?  Surely not?

 

The Cod Wars really upset Bolty.

8 hours ago, Ani said:

You know you can not trust the BBC. 

Oh don't worry. They tried their hardest to not be too obviously disparaging but their true colours shone through. You can be sure of that.

And ere their limbs grew stiff and cold, their hearts blood died in every fold.

3 hours ago, CambridgeBWFC said:

1973, after 3 years of Conservative leadership?  Surely not?

 

That's right yes. That tory bastard James Callaghan was the problem.

2 hours ago, Nowack said:

Not all of his supporters are pig thick, swivel-eyed racists and conspiracy theorists and gun nonces but all pig thick, swivel-eyed racists and conspiracy theorists and gun nonces support him. 

The mantra of the Remainers runs deep in this one Obi Wan.

 

42 minutes ago, bolty58 said:

That's right yes. That tory bastard James Callaghan was the problem.

A bit before my time but you're going to have to explain this one to me;

How was James Callaghan, the Labour PM from 76-79(?) responsible for Britain being shite in 1973 under a different party?

45 minutes ago, Duck Egg said:

A bit before my time but you're going to have to explain this one to me;

How was James Callaghan, the Labour PM from 76-79(?) responsible for Britain being shite in 1973 under a different party?

He's got his years mixed up the silly sausage.

39 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said:

He's got his years mixed up the silly sausage.

The gormless geriatric has form for this! 

1 hour ago, Duck Egg said:

A bit before my time but you're going to have to explain this one to me;

How was James Callaghan, the Labour PM from 76-79(?) responsible for Britain being shite in 1973 under a different party?

At least he didnt blame Corbyn.

2 hours ago, bolty58 said:

Oh don't worry. They tried their hardest to not be too obviously disparaging but their true colours shone through. You can be sure of that.

And ere their limbs grew stiff and cold, their hearts blood died in every fold.

I am glad we had your mega brain to decipher it all. 

22 hours ago, Carlos said:

I don't think anyone gives a fuck about what's happening over there atm, what with our country being in the worst state in my lifetime and all.

DT lives rent free in many posters head. 

3 minutes ago, royal white said:

DT lives rent free in many posters head. 

None more than yours.

Just now, Cheese said:

None more than yours.

Does anyone unless they are massive US political followers really give him more than a passing thought other than when he's in the news?

As you say, our politics is in a much more interesting state at the moment.

11 minutes ago, Not in Crawley said:

Does anyone unless they are massive US political followers really give him more than a passing thought other than when he's in the news?

As you say, our politics is in a much more interesting state at the moment.

No, but some yearn for his return like a loyal dog howls for its deceased Master.

Also, I didn't say that.

1 minute ago, Cheese said:

No, but some yearn for his return like a loyal dog howls for its deceased Master.

Also, I didn't say that.

Sorry infered. Disaster or not, its certainly not boring.

6 hours ago, Duck Egg said:

A bit before my time but you're going to have to explain this one to me;

How was James Callaghan, the Labour PM from 76-79(?) responsible for Britain being shite in 1973 under a different party?

Because he was the architect of the Social Contract proposed between the Trade Unions and (future Labour) Government.  Anything seemed better than Heath, a situation strangely reminiscent of today's outlook.

14 hours ago, Duck Egg said:

A bit before my time but you're going to have to explain this one to me;

How was James Callaghan, the Labour PM from 76-79(?) responsible for Britain being shite in 1973 under a different party?

Simple. Old bastard confusion. 73 should have read 78. I'm off to Specsavers and the off licence.

12 hours ago, Ani said:

I am glad we had your mega brain to decipher it all. 

Look at the post above sunshine. Mega should probably have read 'meagre'.

So if the reds do well in the mid terms, will Trump accept the vote as legit? Or will he once again claim it’s rigged?