What is that "mate" of mine Sadiq Khan trying to achieve ?

 

You lost you demented little cretin, get over it and concentrate on your job you terrorist sympathiser.

I hope Boby is keeping count of all these mentions of gammons.

15 minutes ago, royal white said:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14251803/amp/Government-spent-27million-taxpayers-money-interpreters-non-English-speaking-benefit-claimants-2019.html

 

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14462351/amp/people-Britain-speak-English.html

To be fair - a lot of that will be translating for Welsh people who are refusing to speak English 😁

15 minutes ago, Casino said:

In fact, stick some pictures of the greyhound on the east lancs on the beach and no fuckers gonna come

I stayed there once. Grimness. 

Just now, Sweep said:

I stayed there once. Grimness. 

Trust me, its 10 x worse

At least

46 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:

Andy Saxon 😂😂

Looks a proper gammon in that photo. Then there’s the photo of him alongside Tommy Robinson.

“You have to be able to home refugees in your own house or your opinion on us welcoming any is nonsense”

Okay then 🙄

 Such a peculiar argument 

Do you remember a few weeks ago when I said I thought the far right could take over the CofE? There's a lot of them who suddenly seem to have found the Lord! 

Maybe they should put a little picture of a boat full of migrants on each packet of bing like they do with packs of fags?

Make em think twice before the key goes in?

 

Tice has found a way to make the abortion debate about ‘other cultures’. He is a twat even by Reform standards. 

Edited June 18, 2025Jun 18 by Ani

5 minutes ago, gonzo said:

Maybe they should put a little picture of a boat full of migrants on each packet of bing like they do with packs of fags?

Make em think twice before the key goes in?

 

😂👍

40 minutes ago, Cheese said:

A gammon bait video, aimed at thick people like yourself. It's like asking people "Do you think we should end homelessness?" and when they obviously answer 'yes', following up with "Well, can we move one into your house then?"

Not at all.

We should allow refugees here on the scale we have? Is the obvious answer Yes like you stated above?

It's No from me and many others. 

52 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:

Andy Saxon 😂😂

Looks a proper gammon in that photo. Then there’s the photo of him alongside Tommy Robinson.

“You have to be able to home refugees in your own house or your opinion on us welcoming any is nonsense”

Okay then 🙄

 Such a peculiar argument 

Predictable. Next you'll be going on about my Twitter fee......

51 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:

He’s stuck in a proper Twitter wormhole if he’s seeing this kind of shite. 
 

Only recently he was up for us accepting Ukrainian refugees. Now he seems confused.

Twitter will do that to you I guess. 

🙄

9 minutes ago, wanderer1984 said:

Not at all.

We should allow refugees here on the scale we have? Is the obvious answer Yes like you stated above?

It's No from me and many others. 

Predictable. Next you'll be going on about my Twitter fee......

🙄

Should we try to end homelessness?

48 minutes ago, kent_white said:

Do you remember a few weeks ago when I said I thought the far right could take over the CofE? There's a lot of them who suddenly seem to have found the Lord! 

Cosplaying as a Christian on social media is one thing

Actually attending church and living the faith, much less taking over the established church, is quite another

 

1 hour ago, gonzo said:

That was my point. 

Do you think nobody has ever thought of this earth shattering solution before? 

Fuck me

Aye get some education videos on the big screen in pubs or fanzones at England matches.

That'll stop em.

Think you've been on the gear yourself ffs.

Haha

I wish 😉

It's not about thinking about it. Never said it would stop everyone. But if you come down harder on possession then things will change, or you legalise it. But just burying heads in the sand and saying 'it is what it is' only makes things worse. 

Either way, anyone buying gear and moaning about the boats is a fckn hypocrite 

42 minutes ago, wanderer1984 said:

Not at all.

We should allow refugees here on the scale we have? Is the obvious answer Yes like you stated above?

It's No from me and many others. 

Predictable. Next you'll be going on about my Twitter fee......

🙄

You're posting a video from a Tommy Robinson worshipping nutjob mate. How can you expect people not to say something? Sources are always important. 

More than happy to discuss the amount of refugees we should take in. Nothing wrong with you thinking we should take less either

That's not the argument your post made. The lad was going around asking the people protesting if they would take in a refugee. That's a ridiculous argument. Implies that you can't think we should take some refugees in if you can't have one in your home. Can you not see how daft that is?

Plenty of people wanted us to take a share of Ukrainians. It was the right thing to do. Why do you have to be able to host one to hold that opinion? 

58 minutes ago, gonzo said:

Maybe they should put a little picture of a boat full of migrants on each packet of bing like they do with packs of fags?

Make em think twice before the key goes in?

 

Or just send them to a sealed camp for a year anytime they're caught in possession. The vile druggy hypocrites 😉

Mdma is exempt by the way. It's made by fairies in the woods with no links to any crime whatsoever. 

Edited June 18, 2025Jun 18 by London Wanderer

29 minutes ago, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

Cosplaying as a Christian on social media is one thing

Actually attending church and living the faith, much less taking over the established church, is quite another

 

We'll see. Perhaps 'hijack' as opposed to 'take over' would have been a better way of putting it. 

But I do think that some of them will start attending church, that's the next logical progression. And try to make racial tensions a religious thing too - but they will almost certainly not be living the faith. 

Think airlines get heavily penalised if passengers don't have a valid UK visa or ETA. So no they can't get just get flights.  

22 minutes ago, kent_white said:

We'll see. Perhaps 'hijack' as opposed to 'take over' would have been a better way of putting it. 

But I do think that some of them will start attending church, that's the next logical progression. And try to make racial tensions a religious thing too - but they will almost certainly not be living the faith. 

Think their 'Christianity' stretches to them fantasising about being on a crusade to fight the Muslims

 

I reckon they all played too much Medieval Total War II growing up. 

Either way I hope you're right regarding church. I'm looking forward to another video of Tommy and his mates crying about free speech as a Vicar politely tells them to fck off out the service. 

Then all his followers will have to boycott Jesus. 

3 hours ago, DazBob said:

I hope Boby is keeping count of all these mentions of gammons.

There will be a tiny illegible graph any day now.

10 hours ago, Cheese said:

Should we try to end homelessness?

 

9 hours ago, London Wanderer said:

You're posting a video from a Tommy Robinson worshipping nutjob mate. How can you expect people not to say something? Sources are always important. 

More than happy to discuss the amount of refugees we should take in. Nothing wrong with you thinking we should take less either

That's not the argument your post made. The lad was going around asking the people protesting if they would take in a refugee. That's a ridiculous argument. Implies that you can't think we should take some refugees in if you can't have one in your home. Can you not see how daft that is?

Plenty of people wanted us to take a share of Ukrainians. It was the right thing to do. Why do you have to be able to host one to hold that opinion? 

Would you take a boat refugee in your home if you had space?

I wouldn't

They shouldn't be welcomed here by a bunch of retards that won't offer to put them up.

How many protests for the homeless do you see every week?

Asking if someone thinks homelessness should end is not a comparison.

 

 

10 hours ago, kent_white said:

We'll see. Perhaps 'hijack' as opposed to 'take over' would have been a better way of putting it. 

But I do think that some of them will start attending church, that's the next logical progression. And try to make racial tensions a religious thing too - but they will almost certainly not be living the faith. 

I believe in this theory and it is tested by research , that he who fucks nuns will later join the church. 
 

Not really relevant but great lyric. Let’s see who can place it ? 

11 minutes ago, Ani said:

I believe in this theory and it is tested by research , that he who fucks nuns will later join the church. 
 

Not really relevant but great lyric. Let’s see who can place it ? 

I just cheated and googled it 😁

10 hours ago, London Wanderer said:

Think their 'Christianity' stretches to them fantasising about being on a crusade to fight the Muslims

 

I reckon they all played too much Medieval Total War II growing up. 

Either way I hope you're right regarding church. I'm looking forward to another video of Tommy and his mates crying about free speech as a Vicar politely tells them to fck off out the service. 

Then all his followers will have to boycott Jesus. 

Yes - I think it's very much along those lines. I'm not sure they will be that impressed when they start reading the gospels. They might like the 'eye for an eye' part. I'm also not sure they will be huge fans of the 'loving thy neighbour' or the 'everyone being one under Jesus Christ' bits etc 😁

1 hour ago, wanderer1984 said:

 

Would you take a boat refugee in your home if you had space?

I wouldn't

They shouldn't be welcomed here by a bunch of retards that won't offer to put them up.

How many protests for the homeless do you see every week?

Asking if someone thinks homelessness should end is not a comparison.

 

 

I'm not sure it's an individuals job to put a refugee up in their house (admirable as that might be). It's the state's responsibility given the international conventions it's signed up to. 

For example 

Article 31 of the 1951 Refugee Convention to which we are a signatory states that "people fleeing persecution may have to use irregular means in order to escape and claim asylum in another country" 

it also prohibits countries from imposing......

"Penalties on asylum refugees who entered illegally in search of asylum if they present themselves without delay" which you could argue might help in some circumstances.

And with regard to @Spider and the G7 country idea......

"There is no such thing as an 'illegal' or 'bogus' person seeking asylum" and "anybody has the right to apply for asylum in any country that has signed the convention and to remain there until the authorities have assessed their claim". 

I'm not saying this is right or wrong - but these are some of the terms we are currently bound by. 

Who would like an asylum centre, hotel or HMO filled with Asylum seekers put on to their street?

Honest answers only

27 minutes ago, gonzo said:

Who would like an asylum centre, hotel or HMO filled with Asylum seekers put on to their street?

Honest answers only

I don't think anybody (answering this question honestly) would say they were happy. Maybe indifferent or curious is about as good as you're going to get?