Jump to content
Wanderers Ways. Neil Thompson 1961-2021

Recommended Posts

Posted
24 minutes ago, Eavesy said:

He can’t cross. Simple as.
 

We spend the entire match going down the left but neither chicksen or that stoke lad can cross.

why persist time after time after time.

he can’t cross!

This. It’s one dimensional. And not working. He has no left foot either.

Its early days and we have lots of injuries. So fair enough.

But I see a few warning signs here. Rochdale fans say Hill is tactically not all that and stubborn. Beginning to see it.

Posted
3 minutes ago, bwfcfan5 said:

This. It’s one dimensional. And not working. He has no left foot either.

Its early days and we have lots of injuries. So fair enough.

But I see a few warning signs here. Rochdale fans say Hill is tactically not all that and stubborn. Beginning to see it.

Got warmed same off Bradford fans about your mate few years back 

  • Moderators
Posted
1 hour ago, Casino said:

That was dire

 

Suppose I could leave it at that

But, we take an undeserved lead and then go to pot

First half, politic may as well have sat down with me

To the left, to the left

Every Fcuking time

Get an undeserved lead then go completely to pot

at 1 1 Murphy probably should have got us back in front, but we hot absolutely what we deserved

I don't think Graham touched the ball in 70 minutes

 

I feel no senior cb available hurts is, but deary me

Awful

Worst I've felt for a long time

  • Site Supporter
Posted

I thought we did ok in first half. Only gonna be one winner.

Wilbraham changed the game, but senior fucked up for the first goal by not closing down, and zouma fell apart in last 20.

Back to very young players today. We can't afford to have so many injuries.

oh and Murphy was utter dogshit when he came on.

Posted
5 minutes ago, HomerJay said:

 

oh and Murphy was utter dogshit when he came on.

Odd. That was the best I've seen him.  Won the ball several times and passed well. Should have scored mind

  • Members
Posted (edited)
48 minutes ago, Eavesy said:

He can’t cross. Simple as.
 

We spend the entire match going down the left but neither chicksen or that stoke lad can cross.

why persist time after time after time.

he can’t cross!

We persist with it time after time because we aren't currently capable of doing very much else. We have little scope to accommodate many injuries, and now that we've lost a couple of players from our best team, this is the result.

I'd have probably opted for playing Dodoo from the start but I doubt it would've made a huge difference.

Edited by Lt. Aldo Raine
Posted (edited)

Too many injuries have fucked us over simple as that. Having to play Senior centre half is just getting desperate. Dont think any team in country could cope with at least 11 first team players being out injured never mind us not even having team chemistry together on top of this. Our luck is just a joke 

Edited by Okocha10
Posted
Just now, Okocha10 said:

Too many injuries have fucked us over simple. Having to play Senior centre half  is just getting desperate. Dont think any team in country could cope with at least 11 first team players being out injured never mind us not even having team chemistry together on top of this. Our luck is just a joke 

Rochdale bringing on a 16 year old RB at half time. We aren’t special. Rochdale are poor but we looked incapable of creating chances against them. Injuries definitely hurting us. But it’s more than that. We are playing out from the back but not good enough to do so and create anything.

  • Members
Posted
1 minute ago, bwfcfan5 said:

Rochdale bringing on a 16 year old RB at half time. We aren’t special. Rochdale are poor but we looked incapable of creating chances against them. Injuries definitely hurting us. But it’s more than that. We are playing out from the back but not good enough to do so and create anything.

They aren't bringing on a sixteen-year-old at half-time because of an injury crisis. They're bringing him on because he's good enough to play, as I suspect you well know.

I think I agree with you about the way we're trying, and failing, to set up, though.

Posted
Just now, Lt. Aldo Raine said:

They aren't bringing on a sixteen-year-old at half-time because of an injury crisis. They're bringing him on because he's good enough to play, as I suspect you well know.

I think I agree with you about the way we're trying, and failing, to set up, though.

They have injuries too. But putting Graham as the attacking midfield player was odd. He worked hard but he’s a more defensive type. The wide players aren’t working, Politic doesn’t look comfortable on the right and the Stoke lad has no left foot. Way we are setting up and trying to play is not right. 

Posted

With a squad as threadbare as ours your not gonna win games with your better players out, Bridcutt, Wright, Hobbs, Buckley it was inevitable that we weren’t going to get anything. And can we now fuck off clapping the likes of Wilbraham onto the pitch who then destroys us. 

  • Members
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, bwfcfan5 said:

They have injuries too. But putting Graham as the attacking midfield player was odd. He worked hard but he’s a more defensive type. The wide players aren’t working, Politic doesn’t look comfortable on the right and the Stoke lad has no left foot. Way we are setting up and trying to play is not right. 

They have players out injured too, but we're uniquely unplaced to cope with even the regular number of players picking up injuries, never mind the number we have out as things stand. 

I agree with the rest of your post, though. If we're playing Politic at all, I'd be tempted to play him through the middle. And Graham looked quite a distance off being ready today, which is no great crime given his age. With the players we had available to us today, I think we might've been better playing more direct.

Edited by Lt. Aldo Raine
  • Members
Posted

On the whole I didn't think we were too bad. Don't get me wrong, lots of room for improvement but there's the makings of a decent side there. Ultimately three defensive fuck ups cost us. First goal was far too easy getting the ball I to feet in the box, the second two was a case of our defenders backing off and backing off.

Only other real gripe is we're far too dependant on our left hand side. It was crying out to switch over to the right..  and when we did, hey presto, we scored.

Missed Bridcutt terribly today, but we need to get over that quickly.

  • Site Supporter
Posted

I thought Rochdale were poor but we ran out of steam in the second half. We play some decent stuff until we get to the opposition box, then we didn't have a clue today.

We scored a good goal but there was only going to be one winner.

Posted

Bridcutt's absence really showed today - the midfield was absent as soon as Lowe got a yellow. 

The less said about Zouma's last half hour, the better. 

Dodoo's assist was excellent, he looked like a genuine outlet. Deserves a start IMO.

  • Members
Posted

Seemed to be a lack of confidence with shooting. Too many times there was an opportunity to get a shot away first time, but a first and/or second touch was taken and the defenders were able to then block the shot.

Posted

I thought we were the better team in first half. Verliden got a lot of crosses into the box.

Problem is 1 old striker in the box to get on the end isnt going to work.

The midfield needed to support or we have to have 2 up front

Posted
42 minutes ago, HomerJay said:

 

oh and Murphy was utter dogshit when he came on.

Thought he did ok.  But Wilbraham did more (including outsprinting Zouma) in 20 mins then the other Murphy did in 90.

  • Members
Posted

After the game yoof said to me that at least he got to cheer something and, most importantly, the football was so much better to watch than it has been for the last couple of years.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.