Meanwhile In England

[Sweep]

21 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:

Can we send this lad to Rwanda as well ? 
 

 

So to prove I love my country, I have to take a Tuesday off work to go and hang around in London with people like him?

[Sweep]

I like his Bio though

 

Quote

Guardian of Faith | I am dedicated to defending my family and homeland 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧| Trusting in Jesus Christ, Our Savior. 🙏✝️

Good to see he's a good old fashioned God fearing Christian

[London Wanderer]

4 minutes ago, Sweep said:

So to prove I love my country, I have to take a Tuesday off work to go and hang around in London with people like him?

Aye

And to stand up against the indocrination of all our children. It's for the kids mostly. 

This was what life was like before they all became indoctrinated. A simpler, more patriotic time. 
 

 

[Tonge moor green jacket]

7 minutes ago, Sweep said:

So to prove I love my country, I have to take a Tuesday off work to go and hang around in London with people like him?

Was perfectly reasonable until he started saying that. Turned it off once he started along that line.

Strange though, that a chap wanting to attend a march of celebration (and no doubt protest) is condemned and wanted to be sent to Rwanda.

Yet protests promoting terror and anti British values are applauded.

Some twisted logic around.

 

[London Wanderer]

3 minutes ago, Tonge moor green jacket said:

Was perfectly reasonable until he started saying that. Turned it off once he started along that line.

Strange though, that a chap wanting to attend a march of celebration (and no doubt protest) is condemned and wanted to be sent to Rwanda.

Yet protests promoting terror and anti British values are applauded.

Some twisted logic around.

 

Surely you recognise when a joke is being made 😄 No different to yours earlier.

Course he's being condemned. He's an activist who works alongside Tommr Robinson. There is nothing strange about people condemning or questioning his views. 

And can you give us some examples of people who are applauding protests that promote terror and anti British values? 

Looks like you're just making stuff up now. 

 

[Sweep]

36 minutes ago, Sweep said:

I like his Bio though

 

Good to see he's a good old fashioned God fearing Christian

I'm glad he has found God, as he clearly wasn't very nice a few years ago

 

Danny Tommo – real name Daniel Thomas was exposed in 2016 as a convicted (albeit bungled) kidnapper. He was jailed for two years for his part in the crime.

[wakey]

Down with woke corporations that make you work.

Stand up for moaning down the pub.

And for your childrens' right to moan down the pub. 

And your childrens' children.

Up the revolution gathering brothers.

[royal white]

3 hours ago, London Wanderer said:

😂

 Very good.

 I’m with everyone else that I’d like to see him deported when the sentence is up. No sympathy from this kefir weaver. I’m just trying to understand the judge’s decision. Don’t think it’s as simple as ‘lefty human rights judges’. 
 

Hard to say without seeing the case (Cleverly has also asked for more transparency around these cases). But two things are significant for me. Would he be killed & would his family be at risk?

If there’s evidence his family would be at risk, & they are them harmed because of the deportation, then that would create moral & legal problems. 
 

Then if he’s killed. Whilst nobody would have much sympathy. That could create further legal problems for the government if we’re sending people who’ve already served a prison sentence to their death.

The other option is to deport immediately, but that’s little justice for the victim if they’re not serving a sentence.

 

Would/could he commit again? That should override both of those. This case has been going on for years. I’m guessing if the Eritreans wanted his family dead that would have happened a long time ago. 
 

Theres no reason at all, not a single one, why he should be allowed to stay. 

[Traf]

7 minutes ago, royal white said:

Would/could he commit again? That should override both of those. This case has been going on for years. I’m guessing if the Eritreans wanted his family dead that would have happened a long time ago. 
 

Theres no reason at all, not a single one, why he should be allowed to stay. 

Despite being a woke Communist compared to some on here, I have to agree with my Fascist friend on this one.

If you're granted asylum and you get banged up, then your right to stay should be terminated.

[royal white]

4 minutes ago, Traf said:

Despite being a woke Communist compared to some on here, I have to agree with my Fascist friend on this one.

If you're granted asylum and you get banged up, then your right to stay should be terminated.

You sound like a young Tommy R 

[deeane Koontz]

1 hour ago, Sweep said:

I'm glad he has found God, as he clearly wasn't very nice a few years ago

 

Danny Tommo – real name Daniel Thomas was exposed in 2016 as a convicted (albeit bungled) kidnapper. He was jailed for two years for his part in the crime.

 

He's a proper wrong un

[gonzo]

4 hours ago, Traf said:

Send him to Rwanda

I watched Lille v Marseille the other day and they had visit Rwanda adverts on the flashy light hoardings whizzing round the pitch.

Can't be that bad if they are advertising weekends away.

You should get on it mate.

[royal white]

7 minutes ago, gonzo said:

I watched Lille v Marseille the other day and they had visit Rwanda adverts on the flashy light hoardings whizzing round the pitch.

Can't be that bad if they are advertising weekends away.

You should get on it mate.

[London Wanderer]

1 hour ago, royal white said:

Would/could he commit again? That should override both of those. This case has been going on for years. I’m guessing if the Eritreans wanted his family dead that would have happened a long time ago. 
 

Theres no reason at all, not a single one, why he should be allowed to stay. 

I’m with you & others that I’d like to see him sent back, especially given the nature of this case.

 All I’m saying is there could be a reason. We don’t know the evidence of the appeal that was presented in court. If you know the details then I’m happy to have the discussion put to bed. If there was genuine evidence that he could be killed, then I’d understand why a judge might accept the appeal. Even if most the British public would disagree. 

[royal white]

2 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:

I’m with you & others that I’d like to see him sent back, especially given the nature of this case.

 All I’m saying is there could be a reason. We don’t know the evidence of the appeal that was presented in court. If you know the details then I’m happy to have the discussion put to bed. If there was genuine evidence that he could be killed, then I’d understand why a judge might accept the appeal. Even if most the British public would disagree. 

In my eyes there is no reason. Not a one. He could be punished, that’s his fault. He could rape again whose fault is that? If you was  judge would you be in favour of potentially a child being raped or him being punished? 

[mickbrown]

4 hours ago, Sweep said:

So to prove I love my country, I have to take a Tuesday off work to go and hang around in London with people like him?

Not only that, if you don’t go you don’t care about your children 

[London Wanderer]

31 minutes ago, royal white said:

In my eyes there is no reason. Not a one. He could be punished, that’s his fault. He could rape again whose fault is that? If you was  judge would you be in favour of potentially a child being raped or him being punished? 

Exactly -  ‘in your eyes’, so we don’t the the evidence behind the decision is all I’m saying. 
 

He could rape again. In the UK or in Eritrea. Sending him back doesn’t necessarily prevent him reoffending. It just means it wouldn’t be a British victim. 
 

Your last question is an odd one. I’m not a judge and I didn’t see the evidence for & against in this appeal. I’m also not legally bound to adhere to human rights laws in my decision making. So answering that question isn’t possible. 
 

[mickbrown]

4 hours ago, Sweep said:

I like his Bio though

 

Good to see he's a good old fashioned God fearing Christian

If he was such a Christian, you think he’d take the time to learn how to spell saviour. 

[London Wanderer]

3 hours ago, Sweep said:

I'm glad he has found God, as he clearly wasn't very nice a few years ago

 

Danny Tommo – real name Daniel Thomas was exposed in 2016 as a convicted (albeit bungled) kidnapper. He was jailed for two years for his part in the crime.

 

1 hour ago, deeane Koontz said:

 

He's a proper wrong un

Careful lads

 Remember you’ve got to all call out any terrorists when also criticising this fella. 
 

Otherwise you’re just full of “twisted logic”.

[Cheese]

4 hours ago, London Wanderer said:

Can we send this lad to Rwanda as well ? 
 

 

FFS. I had an important work meeting on the 23rd of April. Going to have to cancel it now and get a train down to London to prove I care about my children and secure my right to talk about the state of our country. THANKS DANNY

Edited April 9, 2024 by Cheese

[royal white]

14 minutes ago, London Wanderer said:

Exactly -  ‘in your eyes’, so we don’t the the evidence behind the decision is all I’m saying. 
 

He could rape again. In the UK or in Eritrea. Sending him back doesn’t necessarily prevent him reoffending. It just means it wouldn’t be a British victim. 
 

Your last question is an odd one. I’m not a judge and I didn’t see the evidence for & against in this appeal. I’m also not legally bound to adhere to human rights laws in my decision making. So answering that question isn’t possible. 
 

😂😂 and we don’t have any proof that he and his family will be killed. 
 

The point of the post was about how pathetic our judges and laws are. Most agree. You don’t. Using your viewpoint the judge is happy for a British girl to be potentially raped over an Eritrean. (Point to note if he does get dead over there he can’t rape anyone, it’s a win win) 

[Tonge moor green jacket]

Just now, royal white said:

😂😂 and we don’t have any proof that he and his family will be killed. 
 

The point of the post was about how pathetic our judges and laws are. Most agree. You don’t. Using your viewpoint the judge is happy for a British girl to be potentially raped over an Eritrean. (Point to note if he does get dead over there he can’t rape anyone, it’s a win win) 

The totally bizarre "use" of Human rights laws.

Interestingly, the ECHR has just toughened up their own criteria for cunts like these to avoid deportation. 

Not that that should matter, we don't have to abide by what they decide anyway. 

[Sweep]

3 minutes ago, royal white said:

😂😂 and we don’t have any proof that he and his family will be killed. 
 

The point of the post was about how pathetic our judges and laws are. Most agree. You don’t. Using your viewpoint the judge is happy for a British girl to be potentially raped over an Eritrean. (Point to note if he does get dead over there he can’t rape anyone, it’s a win win) 

So what if  him or his family gets dead- that's his problem, not ours. Once he's served his time, then deport him. I'm not sure why anybody would want anything different.

[Mounts Kipper]

6 minutes ago, royal white said:

😂😂 and we don’t have any proof that he and his family will be killed. 
 

The point of the post was about how pathetic our judges and laws are. Most agree. You don’t. Using your viewpoint the judge is happy for a British girl to be potentially raped over an Eritrean. (Point to note if he does get dead over there he can’t rape anyone, it’s a win win) 

Exactly this… get the fucker deported absolutely no reason he’s allowed to stay here. 

[royal white]

3 minutes ago, Sweep said:

So what if  him or his family gets dead- that's his problem, not ours. Once he's served his time, then deport him. I'm not sure why anybody would want anything different.

Exactly. 
 

This fucker has been challenging this for years, I highly doubt he’s paid for it either. 
 

How anyone can agree with the judges is baffling and worrying.