Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted July 27, 2023 Site Supporter Share Posted July 27, 2023 45 minutes ago, Spider said: I’d do a couple of years for a tax free million. I’d do it old school. No internet or jelly, just a load of books. Piece of piss Sounds sore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
royal white Posted July 27, 2023 Share Posted July 27, 2023 Christ there’s going to be loads of claims going in after these asylum seekers get released from the prison barges Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted July 27, 2023 Site Supporter Share Posted July 27, 2023 2 minutes ago, royal white said: Christ there’s going to be loads of claims going in after these asylum seekers get released from the prison barges All via the law breaking human rights lawyers, at 10k a pop! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
green genie Posted July 27, 2023 Share Posted July 27, 2023 3 hours ago, Spider said: I’d do a couple of years for a tax free million. I’d do it old school. No internet or telly, just a load of books. Piece of piss Can sign you up to RN submarines for similar but only about 100k / annum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
London Wanderer Posted July 29, 2023 Share Posted July 29, 2023 On 27/07/2023 at 12:45, Tonge moor green jacket said: Wouldn't have thought that would be the be all and end all. Surely he had an alibi etc. Just seems weird. Anyway, hope he gets to enjoy the rest of his life. Aye me too not going to be easy adapting to society now, hope he get’s the support he needs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted July 29, 2023 Site Supporter Share Posted July 29, 2023 2 hours ago, London Wanderer said: Aye me too not going to be easy adapting to society now, hope he get’s the support he needs The MoJ should be supplying him with a free brass every month for as long as he wants. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
globaldiver Posted August 16, 2023 Share Posted August 16, 2023 (edited) Did we establish who was DPP at the time the new DNA could have been used? Edited August 16, 2023 by globaldiver Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickbrown Posted August 16, 2023 Share Posted August 16, 2023 2 minutes ago, globaldiver said: Did we establish who was DPP at the time? Desperate stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Spider Posted August 16, 2023 Author Site Supporter Share Posted August 16, 2023 5 minutes ago, globaldiver said: Did we establish who was DPP at the time the new DNA could have been used? I’m assuming Starmer? If so, this is straw grasping at Olympic standard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickbrown Posted August 16, 2023 Share Posted August 16, 2023 2 minutes ago, Spider said: I’m assuming Starmer? If so, this is straw grasping at Olympic standard I was assuming so, but it was either some bloke called Ken MacDonald or David Calvert-Smith, depending on the exact date Either way, not quite the gotcha moment GD was hoping for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted August 16, 2023 Site Supporter Share Posted August 16, 2023 The dpp isn't the problem, unless something very malicious went to the very top, which I can't see. It has been revealed today though that the police/prosecution found out that the dna evidence proved his innocence, but sat on it for years, and did nothing. He was even refused an appeal whilst they knew this- what I can't understand is why? If they knew who the dna belonged to back then, just go get him, surely? Something very, very wrong here, and whoever was responsible for the cover up should be getting a stretch themselves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickbrown Posted August 16, 2023 Share Posted August 16, 2023 (edited) 1 minute ago, Tonge moor green jacket said: The dpp isn't the problem, unless something very malicious went to the very top, which I can't see. It has been revealed today though that the police/prosecution found out that the dna evidence proved his innocence, but sat on it for years, and did nothing. He was even refused an appeal whilst they knew this- what I can't understand is why? If they knew who the dna belonged to back then, just go get him, surely? Something very, very wrong here, and whoever was responsible for the cover up should be getting a stretch themselves. Never fail to add 2 and 2 and get political dogshit. You know the rules. 😃 Edited August 16, 2023 by mickbrown Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
globaldiver Posted August 16, 2023 Share Posted August 16, 2023 2 minutes ago, mickbrown said: I was assuming so, but it was either some bloke called Ken MacDonald or David Calvert-Smith, depending on the exact date Either way, not quite the gotcha moment GD was hoping for. Well, early days, but it was on telly that they have known since 2009. Clearly mistakes have been made and covered up. It’ll be interesting to see at what level the cover up was. Might be DPP, we’ll hopefully find out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickbrown Posted August 16, 2023 Share Posted August 16, 2023 Just now, globaldiver said: Well, early days, but it was on telly that they have known since 2009. Clearly mistakes have been made and covered up. It’ll be interesting to see at what level the cover up was. Might be DPP, we’ll hopefully find out. 2007. Ken MacDonald. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted August 16, 2023 Site Supporter Share Posted August 16, 2023 Hang on Mick, it's not like left leaning posters never do such things eh! Anyway, can't be arsed with it- politics and law can be unhealthy bedfellows, as we see across the pond. There is a big moral (and presumably real) crime here that some have perpetrated for unknown reasons, and they must be persued. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
globaldiver Posted August 16, 2023 Share Posted August 16, 2023 8 minutes ago, mickbrown said: 2007. Ken MacDonald. No, the key date was 2009, when an appeal could have been granted. Good read up in The Guardian. Clearly Sir Keir wasn’t involved, just like he wasn’t for Jimmy Savile. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted August 16, 2023 Site Supporter Share Posted August 16, 2023 7 minutes ago, globaldiver said: No, the key date was 2009, when an appeal could have been granted. Good read up in The Guardian. Clearly Sir Keir wasn’t involved, just like he wasn’t for Jimmy Savile. I know where you're going- there are parallels with the constant criticism of Boris by Starmer for not running a tight ship- but I hope it doesn't go down this route. Bit of a cat fight that doesn't paint any one in a good light. Rishi will need to be more witty than that to have a chance at the next election I think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickbrown Posted August 16, 2023 Share Posted August 16, 2023 (edited) 25 minutes ago, globaldiver said: No, the key date was 2009, when an appeal could have been granted. Good read up in The Guardian. Clearly Sir Keir wasn’t involved, just like he wasn’t for Jimmy Savile. The CPS isn’t the CCRC. Edited August 16, 2023 by mickbrown Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted August 16, 2023 Site Supporter Share Posted August 16, 2023 Indeed. Does seem to be concerns that the prosecution wouldn't release the info, in which case the ccrc wouldn't have anything to approve the request on. Obviously a lot of information we don't know, but from what we're learning, the fault does seem to lie with the authorities who bring about the prosecution. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Spider Posted August 16, 2023 Author Site Supporter Share Posted August 16, 2023 I’m still flabbergasted that he has to pay for his stay in prison. Itd be hilarious if it wasn’t a reality. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted August 16, 2023 Site Supporter Share Posted August 16, 2023 41 minutes ago, Spider said: I’m still flabbergasted that he has to pay for his stay in prison. Itd be hilarious if it wasn’t a reality. He doesn't. Emergency legislation being brought in to quash it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ani Posted August 16, 2023 Share Posted August 16, 2023 41 minutes ago, Spider said: I’m still flabbergasted that he has to pay for his stay in prison. Itd be hilarious if it wasn’t a reality. Changed that rule. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leigh white Posted August 16, 2023 Share Posted August 16, 2023 40 minutes ago, Spider said: I’m still flabbergasted that he has to pay for his stay in prison. Itd be hilarious if it wasn’t a reality. 17 years for paying for this tackle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Supporter Tonge moor green jacket Posted August 16, 2023 Site Supporter Share Posted August 16, 2023 Just now, Ani said: Changed that rule. Aye. Fucking no brainer! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickbrown Posted August 16, 2023 Share Posted August 16, 2023 I see he’s fucked off to Holland and is trying to get Dutch citizenship. Can’t say I blame him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.